Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Diagnostic Performances of GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro in “Diagnosis Please” Cases
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Backgrounds
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing and demonstrating high performance in understanding textual information, suggesting potential applications in interpreting patient histories and documented imaging findings. LLMs are advancing rapidly and an improvement in their diagnostic ability is expected. Furthermore, there has been a lack of comprehensive comparisons between LLMs from various manufacturers.
Purpose
We tested the diagnostic performance of the latest three major LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro) using
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases, a monthly diagnostic quiz series for radiology experts.
Materials and Methods
Clinical history and imaging findings as provided textually by the case submitters were extracted from 324 quiz questions from
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases. The GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro generated the top three differential diagnoses. Diagnostic performance among the three LLMs were compared using Cochrane’s Q and post-hoc McNemar’s tests.
Results
The diagnostic accuracies for the primary diagnosis were 41.0%, 54.0%, and 33.9% for GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, respectively. When considering the accuracy of any of the top three differential diagnoses, the rates improved to 49.4%, 62.0%, and 41.0%, respectively. Significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed among all pairs of the models.
Conclusion
In a comparison of the latest LLMs, Claude 3 Opus outperformed GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro in solving radiology quiz cases. These models appear capable of assisting radiologists when supplied with accurate evaluations and worded descriptions of imaging findings by radiologists.
Summary statement
Claude 3 Opus achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, in a comparison of their performance on 324 text-based
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases..
Key Results
This study compared the diagnostic performances of the latest three major large language models, GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro, using clinical history and textualized imaging findings in
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases.
The top three differential diagnoses generated by GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro achieved diagnostic accuracies of 49.4%, 62.0%, and 41.0%, respectively, with statistically significant differences between each model’s performance.
Title: Diagnostic Performances of GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro in “Diagnosis Please” Cases
Description:
Abstract
Backgrounds
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly advancing and demonstrating high performance in understanding textual information, suggesting potential applications in interpreting patient histories and documented imaging findings.
LLMs are advancing rapidly and an improvement in their diagnostic ability is expected.
Furthermore, there has been a lack of comprehensive comparisons between LLMs from various manufacturers.
Purpose
We tested the diagnostic performance of the latest three major LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.
5 Pro) using
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases, a monthly diagnostic quiz series for radiology experts.
Materials and Methods
Clinical history and imaging findings as provided textually by the case submitters were extracted from 324 quiz questions from
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases.
The GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.
5 Pro generated the top three differential diagnoses.
Diagnostic performance among the three LLMs were compared using Cochrane’s Q and post-hoc McNemar’s tests.
Results
The diagnostic accuracies for the primary diagnosis were 41.
0%, 54.
0%, and 33.
9% for GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.
5 Pro, respectively.
When considering the accuracy of any of the top three differential diagnoses, the rates improved to 49.
4%, 62.
0%, and 41.
0%, respectively.
Significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed among all pairs of the models.
Conclusion
In a comparison of the latest LLMs, Claude 3 Opus outperformed GPT-4o and Gemini 1.
5 Pro in solving radiology quiz cases.
These models appear capable of assisting radiologists when supplied with accurate evaluations and worded descriptions of imaging findings by radiologists.
Summary statement
Claude 3 Opus achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by GPT-4o and Gemini 1.
5 Pro, in a comparison of their performance on 324 text-based
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases.
Key Results
This study compared the diagnostic performances of the latest three major large language models, GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.
5 Pro, using clinical history and textualized imaging findings in
Radiology
Diagnosis Please cases.
The top three differential diagnoses generated by GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.
5 Pro achieved diagnostic accuracies of 49.
4%, 62.
0%, and 41.
0%, respectively, with statistically significant differences between each model’s performance.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
[RETRACTED] Gemini Keto Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Gemini Keto Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]➢Product Name —Gemini Keto Gummies ➢Main Benefits —Improve Health & Weight Loss Supplement ➢Composition —Natural Organic Compound ➢Side-Effects—NA ➢Rating: —⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ➢A...
Diagnostic Accuracy of Vision-Language Models on Japanese Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Interventional Radiology Specialty Board Examinations
Diagnostic Accuracy of Vision-Language Models on Japanese Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Interventional Radiology Specialty Board Examinations
Abstract
Purpose
The performance of vision-language models (VLMs) with image interpretation capabilities, such as GPT-4 omni (G...
Diagnostic accuracy of vision-language models on Japanese diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and interventional radiology specialty board examinations
Diagnostic accuracy of vision-language models on Japanese diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and interventional radiology specialty board examinations
Abstract
Purpose
The performance of vision-language models (VLMs) with image interpretation capabilities, such as GPT-4 o...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Performance of Novel GPT-4 in Otolaryngology Knowledge Assessment
Performance of Novel GPT-4 in Otolaryngology Knowledge Assessment
Abstract
Purpose
GPT-4, recently released by OpenAI, improves upon GPT-3.5 with increased reliability and expanded capabilities, including user-spec...
Reasoning-based LLMs surpass average human performance on medical social skills
Reasoning-based LLMs surpass average human performance on medical social skills
Abstract
A significant portion of medical licensing examinations assesses key social skills such as communication, ethics, and professionalism, which are vital for qualit...
Analisis Penggunaan GPT dalam Pembelajaran Klinik Optik I di ARO Gapopin
Analisis Penggunaan GPT dalam Pembelajaran Klinik Optik I di ARO Gapopin
Perkembangan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI), khususnya model bahasa besar seperti Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), telah membawa transformasi bes...

