Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparative Study upon using Sanitizers and Personal Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic between Saudi and Egyptian Health Care Providers

View through CrossRef
Wearing masks were effective in reducing the probability of infection with COVID-19, but wearing them for long time cause many problems. This paper was aimed to compare between Saudi and Egyptian HCWs upon using sanitizers and personal protective equipment (PPE) during COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected through a well-structured questionnaire, among Saudi HCWs (online) and Egyptian HCWs through paper questionnaire interview. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions about Socio-demographic, types of masks, gloves and sanitizers they used during their works. It includes the adverse skin reactions on hands and face upon using PPE for long periods during COVID 19 pandemic. Our results revealed that most of Saudi & Egyptian HCWs wearing surgical masks (57.8% & 63.6%), > N95 (12.9% &18.2%), using latex surgical gloves (44.9% & 56.8%), > plastic gloves (11.1% &18.2%) respectively. The most affected area from wearing PPE are hands (49.8% & 54.5%) followed by Auricular area (44% & 40.9%), nasal bridge (28.9% & 22.7%), check (16.9% & 13.6%), whole face (15.6% & 25%) among Saudi & Egyptian HCWs respectively. About 70% of Egyptian HCWs from our participants used alcohol 70% in form of gel as sanitizer which was significantly higher than Saudi HCWs (59.1%). While no significant differences were found from using other sanitizers such as liquid alcohol 70% or Dettol. The most adverse reaction due to using sanitizers was skin dryness (55.1% & 63.6%) among Saudi & Egyptian HCWs respectively. We can conclude that significant increase was found among HCWs in Egypt either in wearing surgical and N95 masks or in wearing surgical and plastic gloves when compared to Saudi HCWs. According to the side effects on hands and face due to wearing PPE among HCWs either from KSA or Egypt, there were some variations by increase or decrease in the percentages. The most adverse reaction due to using sanitizers (specially alcohol 70% in form of gel) was skin dryness.
Title: Comparative Study upon using Sanitizers and Personal Protective Equipment during COVID-19 Pandemic between Saudi and Egyptian Health Care Providers
Description:
Wearing masks were effective in reducing the probability of infection with COVID-19, but wearing them for long time cause many problems.
This paper was aimed to compare between Saudi and Egyptian HCWs upon using sanitizers and personal protective equipment (PPE) during COVID-19 pandemic.
Data was collected through a well-structured questionnaire, among Saudi HCWs (online) and Egyptian HCWs through paper questionnaire interview.
The questionnaire consists of 23 questions about Socio-demographic, types of masks, gloves and sanitizers they used during their works.
It includes the adverse skin reactions on hands and face upon using PPE for long periods during COVID 19 pandemic.
Our results revealed that most of Saudi & Egyptian HCWs wearing surgical masks (57.
8% & 63.
6%), > N95 (12.
9% &18.
2%), using latex surgical gloves (44.
9% & 56.
8%), > plastic gloves (11.
1% &18.
2%) respectively.
The most affected area from wearing PPE are hands (49.
8% & 54.
5%) followed by Auricular area (44% & 40.
9%), nasal bridge (28.
9% & 22.
7%), check (16.
9% & 13.
6%), whole face (15.
6% & 25%) among Saudi & Egyptian HCWs respectively.
About 70% of Egyptian HCWs from our participants used alcohol 70% in form of gel as sanitizer which was significantly higher than Saudi HCWs (59.
1%).
While no significant differences were found from using other sanitizers such as liquid alcohol 70% or Dettol.
The most adverse reaction due to using sanitizers was skin dryness (55.
1% & 63.
6%) among Saudi & Egyptian HCWs respectively.
We can conclude that significant increase was found among HCWs in Egypt either in wearing surgical and N95 masks or in wearing surgical and plastic gloves when compared to Saudi HCWs.
According to the side effects on hands and face due to wearing PPE among HCWs either from KSA or Egypt, there were some variations by increase or decrease in the percentages.
The most adverse reaction due to using sanitizers (specially alcohol 70% in form of gel) was skin dryness.

Related Results

Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth, also known as E-health, is a relatively new area of health communication inquiry that examines the development, implementation, and application of a broad range of evolvin...
The Experiences of Primary Healthcare Nurses During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Australia
The Experiences of Primary Healthcare Nurses During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Australia
AbstractPurposeThe COVID‐19 pandemic has presented an international health crisis of a scope not seen in our lifetime. While much attention has been paid to health workers in criti...
The socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on the petroleum sector in Egypt: a descriptive analysis
The socio-economic impact of COVID-19 on the petroleum sector in Egypt: a descriptive analysis
PurposeThis study explored the impact of COVID-19 on the petroleum sector in Egypt, both economically and socially. Of all sectors of the economy, the oil industry has been one of ...

Back to Top