Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

3D Printed Food Design and Fabrication Approach for Manufacturability, Rheology, and Nutrition Trade-Offs

View through CrossRef
Abstract 3D printing enables the production of personalized designs that are desirable in the medical industry for applications including orthopedics, tissue engineering, and personalized nutrition. Currently, the design process relies on trial-and-error approaches, especially for biomaterial development, and there is a need for methodologies to streamline the design process to facilitate automation. Here, we investigate a design methodology for printing foods by mixing novel biomaterial combinations informed by rheological measurements that indicate printability. The process consists of first printing basic designs with chocolate, marzipan, and potato biomaterials known to print consistently. Rheological measurements are collected for these materials and compared to a novel pumpkin biomaterial. The pumpkin had a higher complex modulus and lower mechanical loss tangent than all other biomaterials, therefore motivating the addition of rheological agents to reach more favorable properties. Varied concentrations of corn starch and guar gum were added to the pumpkin to improve printability while altering the nutrient distribution. A 4% inclusion of guar gum provided the most consistent pumpkin prints. A complex 3D object was fabricated with the 4% guar gum pumpkin material, therefore demonstrating the merits in using rheological properties to inform printability for use in design automation routines. The design approach enabled comparisons of relative nutrition and printability trade-offs to demonstrate a proof-of-concept user interface for design automation to facilitate customized food production. Further research to develop a complete design methodology for linking rheological properties to printability would promote consistent prediction of print quality for novel formulations to support design automation, with potential generalizability for diverse biomaterials.
Title: 3D Printed Food Design and Fabrication Approach for Manufacturability, Rheology, and Nutrition Trade-Offs
Description:
Abstract 3D printing enables the production of personalized designs that are desirable in the medical industry for applications including orthopedics, tissue engineering, and personalized nutrition.
Currently, the design process relies on trial-and-error approaches, especially for biomaterial development, and there is a need for methodologies to streamline the design process to facilitate automation.
Here, we investigate a design methodology for printing foods by mixing novel biomaterial combinations informed by rheological measurements that indicate printability.
The process consists of first printing basic designs with chocolate, marzipan, and potato biomaterials known to print consistently.
Rheological measurements are collected for these materials and compared to a novel pumpkin biomaterial.
The pumpkin had a higher complex modulus and lower mechanical loss tangent than all other biomaterials, therefore motivating the addition of rheological agents to reach more favorable properties.
Varied concentrations of corn starch and guar gum were added to the pumpkin to improve printability while altering the nutrient distribution.
A 4% inclusion of guar gum provided the most consistent pumpkin prints.
A complex 3D object was fabricated with the 4% guar gum pumpkin material, therefore demonstrating the merits in using rheological properties to inform printability for use in design automation routines.
The design approach enabled comparisons of relative nutrition and printability trade-offs to demonstrate a proof-of-concept user interface for design automation to facilitate customized food production.
Further research to develop a complete design methodology for linking rheological properties to printability would promote consistent prediction of print quality for novel formulations to support design automation, with potential generalizability for diverse biomaterials.

Related Results

Relationships Between Polymer Rheology and Polymer Processing
Relationships Between Polymer Rheology and Polymer Processing
Abstract Polymer products have long been used for a variety of applications in our daily lives, as well as for some more exotic applications, such as biomedical devi...
Hydraulic Modeling Helps Designing Ultralow ECD Nonaqueous Fluids to Meet Narrow ECD Windows
Hydraulic Modeling Helps Designing Ultralow ECD Nonaqueous Fluids to Meet Narrow ECD Windows
Abstract Hydraulic modeling was used to simulate the effect of fluid rheology (both high- and low-shear-rate rheology) on the equivalent circulating density (ECD) at...
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Purpose. As a European granary, Ukraine has rich agricultural resources. China is a country with a large population and has a large demand for food. However, the agricultural trade...
British Food Journal Volume 53 Issue 9 1951
British Food Journal Volume 53 Issue 9 1951
In a recent edition of the Ministry's Bulletin, Mr. F. T. Willey, M.P., Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food, urged that the utmost effort should be made by local author...
Identification of flux trade-offs in metabolic networks
Identification of flux trade-offs in metabolic networks
AbstractTrade-offs are inherent to biochemical networks governing diverse cellular functions, from gene expression to metabolism. Yet, trade-offs between fluxes of biochemical reac...
E-Press and Oppress
E-Press and Oppress
From elephants to ABBA fans, silicon to hormone, the following discussion uses a new research method to look at printed text, motion pictures and a te...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...

Back to Top