Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Culture Proven Enteric Fever Treatment with Meropenem Alone Vs Combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin

View through CrossRef
Background: Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi, remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water and sanitation. The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has prompted the exploration of effective antibiotic regimens. While Meropenem has become a critical treatment option, the potential benefit of combining it with Azithromycin is not well established. Objective: The study aimed to compare the efficacy of Meropenem alone versus a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin in the treatment of culture-proven enteric fever, focusing on fever resolution time and hospital stay duration. Methods: Conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, this study involved 81 patients diagnosed with enteric fever. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=40) received Meropenem alone, and Group 2 (n=41) received a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin. Key parameters evaluated included gender distribution, age, duration of defervescence, and length of hospital stay. Statistical significance was assessed using appropriate tests. Results: The study found no significant difference in the duration of fever resolution (P=0.571) and hospital stay (P=0.466) between the two groups. The mean defervescence time was 5.325 days for Group 1 and 5.4878 days for Group 2. The average hospital stay was 6.4 days for Group 1 and 6.6098 days for Group 2. Gender distribution and age profile were comparable across both groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of treating enteric fever with Meropenem alone compared to a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin. This finding supports the use of Meropenem monotherapy as a suitable treatment for enteric fever, potentially reducing treatment protocols and addressing concerns about antibiotic overuse.
Title: Comparison of Culture Proven Enteric Fever Treatment with Meropenem Alone Vs Combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin
Description:
Background: Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi, remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water and sanitation.
The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has prompted the exploration of effective antibiotic regimens.
While Meropenem has become a critical treatment option, the potential benefit of combining it with Azithromycin is not well established.
Objective: The study aimed to compare the efficacy of Meropenem alone versus a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin in the treatment of culture-proven enteric fever, focusing on fever resolution time and hospital stay duration.
Methods: Conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, this study involved 81 patients diagnosed with enteric fever.
They were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=40) received Meropenem alone, and Group 2 (n=41) received a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin.
Key parameters evaluated included gender distribution, age, duration of defervescence, and length of hospital stay.
Statistical significance was assessed using appropriate tests.
Results: The study found no significant difference in the duration of fever resolution (P=0.
571) and hospital stay (P=0.
466) between the two groups.
The mean defervescence time was 5.
325 days for Group 1 and 5.
4878 days for Group 2.
The average hospital stay was 6.
4 days for Group 1 and 6.
6098 days for Group 2.
Gender distribution and age profile were comparable across both groups.
Conclusion: The study concludes that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of treating enteric fever with Meropenem alone compared to a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin.
This finding supports the use of Meropenem monotherapy as a suitable treatment for enteric fever, potentially reducing treatment protocols and addressing concerns about antibiotic overuse.

Related Results

Comparison of efficacy of intravenous ceftraixone versus oral azithromycin in uncomplicated enteric fever.
Comparison of efficacy of intravenous ceftraixone versus oral azithromycin in uncomplicated enteric fever.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravenous ceftriaxone vs oral azithromycin in uncomplicated enteric fever. Study Design: Prospective Cohort study. Setting: Department of Pe...
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding as a complication of enteric fever: A case report
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding as a complication of enteric fever: A case report
Enteric fever is a systemic bacterial infection caused by enteroinvasive, gram-negative bacilli, named Salmonella enterica serovar typhi and Salmonella enterica serovar paratyphi. ...
Analisa Pemberian Azitromicin Sebagai Obat COVID-19 pada Pasien Terkonformasi Positif di Indonesia
Analisa Pemberian Azitromicin Sebagai Obat COVID-19 pada Pasien Terkonformasi Positif di Indonesia
Antibiotics are given to corona patients if the doctor feels it is necessary because the patient is infected by certain bacteria. For example, a coronavirus patient is exposed to b...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Enteric glia
Enteric glia
AbstractThe structure of the enteric nervous system (ENS) is different from that of extraenteric peripheral nerve. Collagen is excluded from the enteric plexuses and support for ne...
Role of Azithromycin in Enteric Fever
Role of Azithromycin in Enteric Fever
Background: In low- and middle-income nations, particularly in South Asia, where growing resistance to first-line and fluoroquinolone antibiotics has made treatment more difficult,...
Comparison of Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Ceftriaxone in Treatment of Enteric Fever
Comparison of Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Ceftriaxone in Treatment of Enteric Fever
Objective: Research was conducted at the Hayatabad Medical Complex in Peshawar to evaluate the relative effectiveness of azithromycin and ceftriaxone in the treatment of enteric fe...

Back to Top