Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Culture Proven Enteric Fever Treatment with Meropenem Alone Vs Combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin

View through CrossRef
Background: Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi, remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water and sanitation. The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has prompted the exploration of effective antibiotic regimens. While Meropenem has become a critical treatment option, the potential benefit of combining it with Azithromycin is not well established. Objective: The study aimed to compare the efficacy of Meropenem alone versus a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin in the treatment of culture-proven enteric fever, focusing on fever resolution time and hospital stay duration. Methods: Conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, this study involved 81 patients diagnosed with enteric fever. They were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=40) received Meropenem alone, and Group 2 (n=41) received a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin. Key parameters evaluated included gender distribution, age, duration of defervescence, and length of hospital stay. Statistical significance was assessed using appropriate tests. Results: The study found no significant difference in the duration of fever resolution (P=0.571) and hospital stay (P=0.466) between the two groups. The mean defervescence time was 5.325 days for Group 1 and 5.4878 days for Group 2. The average hospital stay was 6.4 days for Group 1 and 6.6098 days for Group 2. Gender distribution and age profile were comparable across both groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of treating enteric fever with Meropenem alone compared to a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin. This finding supports the use of Meropenem monotherapy as a suitable treatment for enteric fever, potentially reducing treatment protocols and addressing concerns about antibiotic overuse.
Title: Comparison of Culture Proven Enteric Fever Treatment with Meropenem Alone Vs Combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin
Description:
Background: Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi, remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in regions with limited access to clean water and sanitation.
The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has prompted the exploration of effective antibiotic regimens.
While Meropenem has become a critical treatment option, the potential benefit of combining it with Azithromycin is not well established.
Objective: The study aimed to compare the efficacy of Meropenem alone versus a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin in the treatment of culture-proven enteric fever, focusing on fever resolution time and hospital stay duration.
Methods: Conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar, this study involved 81 patients diagnosed with enteric fever.
They were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=40) received Meropenem alone, and Group 2 (n=41) received a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin.
Key parameters evaluated included gender distribution, age, duration of defervescence, and length of hospital stay.
Statistical significance was assessed using appropriate tests.
Results: The study found no significant difference in the duration of fever resolution (P=0.
571) and hospital stay (P=0.
466) between the two groups.
The mean defervescence time was 5.
325 days for Group 1 and 5.
4878 days for Group 2.
The average hospital stay was 6.
4 days for Group 1 and 6.
6098 days for Group 2.
Gender distribution and age profile were comparable across both groups.
Conclusion: The study concludes that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of treating enteric fever with Meropenem alone compared to a combination of Meropenem and Azithromycin.
This finding supports the use of Meropenem monotherapy as a suitable treatment for enteric fever, potentially reducing treatment protocols and addressing concerns about antibiotic overuse.

Related Results

Frequency of leukocytosis in culture proven enteric fever in children.
Frequency of leukocytosis in culture proven enteric fever in children.
Objective: To determine the frequency of leukocytosis in patients of culture proven enteric fever in children over one year period. Study Design: Retrospective Cross-sectional stud...
Comparison of Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Ceftriaxone in Treatment of Enteric Fever
Comparison of Efficacy of Azithromycin Versus Ceftriaxone in Treatment of Enteric Fever
Objective: Research was conducted at the Hayatabad Medical Complex in Peshawar to evaluate the relative effectiveness of azithromycin and ceftriaxone in the treatment of enteric fe...
Azithromycin vs. chloramphenicol for uncomplicated typhoid fever in children
Azithromycin vs. chloramphenicol for uncomplicated typhoid fever in children
Background The emergence of multiple-drug-resistantSalmonella typhi strains has made it necessary to evaluate newagents for the treatment of typhoid fever. Azithromycin has in vitr...
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) expression in the enteric nervous system and contributions of glial STING in disease
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) expression in the enteric nervous system and contributions of glial STING in disease
AbstractBackgroundAppropriate host–microbe interactions are essential for enteric glial development and subsequent gastrointestinal function, but the potential mechanisms of microb...
Therapeutic efficacy of macrolides in management of patients with mild COVID-19
Therapeutic efficacy of macrolides in management of patients with mild COVID-19
Abstract Evidence on the efficacy of adding macrolides (azithromycin or clarithromycin) to the treatment regimen for COVID-19 is limited. We testify whether adding azithrom...
Azithromycin for COVID-19: Pharmacological Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects
Azithromycin for COVID-19: Pharmacological Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects
The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic led to a new challenge in the field of effective treatment methods for this disease. Antiviral and immunomodulatory agents were suggeste...
Carbapenem resistance gene crisis in A. baumannii: A computational analysis
Carbapenem resistance gene crisis in A. baumannii: A computational analysis
AbstractAcinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii)is one of the members ofESKAPEbacteria which is considered multidrug resistant globally. The objective of this study is to determine t...
Blood Culture Isolates and Antibiogram for Salmonella at Tertiary Care Hospital
Blood Culture Isolates and Antibiogram for Salmonella at Tertiary Care Hospital
Objective: To determine the pattern of blood culture isolates and antibiogram for salmonella at tertiary care hospital and identify frequency of multi-drug resistance and XDR. Meth...

Back to Top