Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of qt prolongation in patients following conduction system pacing implantation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Conduction system pacing is becoming increasingly popular as a pacing technique; however, its impact on repolarization, particularly on QT interval prolongation, remains unclear.
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of conduction system pacing on the QT interval.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received a left bundle branch lead at two centers between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Patients with left bundle pacing were included if they: identified as having deep septal or left bundle pacing (satisfying 2 of 3 markers—LVAT <80 ms, R’ in V1, PR1R6 >30 ms) and had a prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc >550 ms). Demographic and clinical data were collected through electronic medical records.
Results
From 597 patients who received a 3830 lead, 14 patients with left bundle branch pacing were identified as having QTc >550 ms (mean age 82 ± 6 years, 5 females). Nine patients received their device for complete heart block, 3 for tachy-brady and one after AV [MG1] node ablation. The average ejection fraction was 47 ± 13%. Post-implant ECG analysis showed an average QRS width of 127 ± 14 ms, an average QTc interval of 584 ± 28 ms, and an average heart rate of 74 ± 14 bpm. Notably, one patient experienced Torsades de Pointes three hours post-AV node ablation, with a QT interval of 600 ms that persisted for two weeks post-implant. All patients survived, with a mean follow-up period of 609 ± 470 days.
Conclusion
QT prolongation can occur following the placement of a conduction system pacing lead, which may elevate the risk of Torsades de Pointes post-implantation. In cases of prolonged QT, increasing heart rate may help to reduce the QT interval, though it may not fully normalize it. QT prolongation may persist for more than two weeks post-implant. Clinicians should be mindful of the potential for QT prolongation with conduction system pacing and consider closer follow-up until QT normalizes.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Evaluation of qt prolongation in patients following conduction system pacing implantation
Description:
Abstract
Background
Conduction system pacing is becoming increasingly popular as a pacing technique; however, its impact on repolarization, particularly on QT interval prolongation, remains unclear.
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of conduction system pacing on the QT interval.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received a left bundle branch lead at two centers between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024.
Patients with left bundle pacing were included if they: identified as having deep septal or left bundle pacing (satisfying 2 of 3 markers—LVAT <80 ms, R’ in V1, PR1R6 >30 ms) and had a prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc >550 ms).
Demographic and clinical data were collected through electronic medical records.
Results
From 597 patients who received a 3830 lead, 14 patients with left bundle branch pacing were identified as having QTc >550 ms (mean age 82 ± 6 years, 5 females).
Nine patients received their device for complete heart block, 3 for tachy-brady and one after AV [MG1] node ablation.
The average ejection fraction was 47 ± 13%.
Post-implant ECG analysis showed an average QRS width of 127 ± 14 ms, an average QTc interval of 584 ± 28 ms, and an average heart rate of 74 ± 14 bpm.
Notably, one patient experienced Torsades de Pointes three hours post-AV node ablation, with a QT interval of 600 ms that persisted for two weeks post-implant.
All patients survived, with a mean follow-up period of 609 ± 470 days.
Conclusion
QT prolongation can occur following the placement of a conduction system pacing lead, which may elevate the risk of Torsades de Pointes post-implantation.
In cases of prolonged QT, increasing heart rate may help to reduce the QT interval, though it may not fully normalize it.
QT prolongation may persist for more than two weeks post-implant.
Clinicians should be mindful of the potential for QT prolongation with conduction system pacing and consider closer follow-up until QT normalizes.
Related Results
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing
Existing techniques for pacing the right ventricle and providing cardiac resynchronization therapy through biventricular pacing are not effective in restoring damage to the conduct...
GW24-e1773 Application of a novel pacing guide wire in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
GW24-e1773 Application of a novel pacing guide wire in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
Objectives
The implantation of left ventricular (LV) lead was the most complicated process in the cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), the aim of this study w...
Non Selective his Bundle Pacing: As Physiological as S-HBP but Simpler and Faster
Non Selective his Bundle Pacing: As Physiological as S-HBP but Simpler and Faster
We have read with interest Dr. Burri’s Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow up [1]. A comprehensive guide to understand electrocardiograph...
Hemodynamic Effects of Artificial Pacing in Complete Heart Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hemodynamic Effects of Artificial Pacing in Complete Heart Block Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
The hemodynamic changes associated with complete heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction and the effects of artificial pacing at various rates on these measurements we...
CLINICAL APPLICATION OF EMERGENCY BEDSIDE TEMPORARY CARDIAC PACING WITHOUT X-RAY FLUOROSCOPY
CLINICAL APPLICATION OF EMERGENCY BEDSIDE TEMPORARY CARDIAC PACING WITHOUT X-RAY FLUOROSCOPY
Objectives
To investigate the clinical value and safety of emergency bedside temporary cardiac pacing without X-ray fluoroscopy.
...
Permanent His Bundle Pacing in atrioventricular block patients:A systematic review and meta-analysis
Permanent His Bundle Pacing in atrioventricular block patients:A systematic review and meta-analysis
【Abstract】 Background:Cardiac pacemakers are still an effective
method for the treatment of atrioventricular block diseases(AVB).
Ventricular pacing results in adverse clinical ou...
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Prevalence and Clinical Predictors
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Prevalence and Clinical Predictors
Background:
The incidence of conduction disease requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation following aortic valve replacement (AVR) ranges from 3% to 6%....
Exercise performance in young patients with complete atrioventricular block: the relevance of synchronous atrioventricular pacing
Exercise performance in young patients with complete atrioventricular block: the relevance of synchronous atrioventricular pacing
AbstractAt present, there are many pacing strategies for young patients with complete atrioventricular block. The most frequent policy is to attempt placing a dual-chamber system w...

