Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
In response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing asynchronous, secure and timely communication between general practitioner (GP) and specialist. This study aims to track adoption of a Queensland eConsultant service in two Australian Primary Health Networks (Western Queensland and Brisbane South) to understand key barriers and enablers to adoption and inform modification of the implementation strategy.
Methods
Our theory-informed mixed-methods evaluation assessed implementation between July 2020 and March 2022. Adoption and implementation activities were prospectively recorded in bespoke tracking spreadsheets with implementation activities coded against the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. Semi-structured interviews with GPs and stakeholders informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted to understand determinants of implementation.
Results
Of the 40 practices invited to take part in the eConsultant service, 20 (50%) enrolled. Of the 97 GPs who consented, 38 sent at least one Request for Advice (RFA) to the eConsultant with a total of 112 RFA sent. Implementation was predominantly guided by eight strategies. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 GPs and 4 stakeholders (12 from rural/remote regions, 11 females and two sole practitioners). Interviewees felt the eConsultant service supported outpatient appointment avoidance and provided efficient, timely access to specialist support for GPs and their patients. Barriers identified to using eConsultant related to digital infrastructure, competing priorities, and keeping the service ‘front of mind’. Key enablers identified were the relative advantage of eConsultant over other options, patient benefits and COVD-19 facilitating the use of digital technology.
Conclusions
This evaluation highlighted service enablers as well as user priorities for broader implementation. A focus on a well-integrated digital system and availability of a variety of eConsultant specialties are seen as key strategies to embedding the eConsultant option in GP advice processes in Australia.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
Description:
Abstract
Background
In response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing asynchronous, secure and timely communication between general practitioner (GP) and specialist.
This study aims to track adoption of a Queensland eConsultant service in two Australian Primary Health Networks (Western Queensland and Brisbane South) to understand key barriers and enablers to adoption and inform modification of the implementation strategy.
Methods
Our theory-informed mixed-methods evaluation assessed implementation between July 2020 and March 2022.
Adoption and implementation activities were prospectively recorded in bespoke tracking spreadsheets with implementation activities coded against the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies.
Semi-structured interviews with GPs and stakeholders informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted to understand determinants of implementation.
Results
Of the 40 practices invited to take part in the eConsultant service, 20 (50%) enrolled.
Of the 97 GPs who consented, 38 sent at least one Request for Advice (RFA) to the eConsultant with a total of 112 RFA sent.
Implementation was predominantly guided by eight strategies.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 GPs and 4 stakeholders (12 from rural/remote regions, 11 females and two sole practitioners).
Interviewees felt the eConsultant service supported outpatient appointment avoidance and provided efficient, timely access to specialist support for GPs and their patients.
Barriers identified to using eConsultant related to digital infrastructure, competing priorities, and keeping the service ‘front of mind’.
Key enablers identified were the relative advantage of eConsultant over other options, patient benefits and COVD-19 facilitating the use of digital technology.
Conclusions
This evaluation highlighted service enablers as well as user priorities for broader implementation.
A focus on a well-integrated digital system and availability of a variety of eConsultant specialties are seen as key strategies to embedding the eConsultant option in GP advice processes in Australia.
Related Results
Implementing a General Practitioner-to-General Physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
Implementing a General Practitioner-to-General Physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia
Abstract
BackgroundIn response to lengthy wait times for specialist outpatient appointments, electronic consultation (eConsult) services have developed globally, providing ...
An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis
An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis
AbstractBackgroundThe eConsultant model of care is an outpatient substitution approach which has been evaluated and implemented extensively internationally. It provides an asynchro...
An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis
An eConsultant versus a hospital-based outpatient consultation for general (internal) medicine: a costing analysis
Abstract
Background
The eConsultant model of care is an outpatient substitution approach which has been evaluated and implemented extensively internationally. It provides ...
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
155-LB: Econsults—An Innovative Model for Diabetes Specialty Care Delivery
155-LB: Econsults—An Innovative Model for Diabetes Specialty Care Delivery
Background: More than 10% of the US population has diabetes. However, a national shortage of endocrinologists limits access to diabetes specialty care, creating a delay of several ...
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
It was always based on a teenage love story between the two kids. One is a sniffer and one is not. It was designed for Central Australia because we do write these kids off there. N...
Filth, Incontinence and Border Protection
Filth, Incontinence and Border Protection
This paper investigates linkages between two apparently disparate government initiatives. Together they function symbolically to maintain Australia’s...
Patient Satisfaction with Nurse Practitioner Caring at Nurse-Managed Centers
Patient Satisfaction with Nurse Practitioner Caring at Nurse-Managed Centers
The purpose of this investigation was to examine patient satisfaction with nurse practitioner care and caring at two selected rural nurse-managed healthcare centers in a mid-west c...

