Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Four‐dimensional dose evaluation using deformable image registration in radiotherapy for liver cancer

View through CrossRef
Purpose:In order to evaluate the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion on the dose delivered to the target volume and critical organs during free‐breathing radiotherapy, a four‐dimensional dose was evaluated using deformable image registration (DIR).Methods:Four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images were acquired for 11 patients who were treated for liver cancer. Internal target volume‐based treatment planning and dose calculation (3D dose) were performed using the end‐exhalation phase images. The four‐dimensional dose (4D dose) was calculated based on DIR of all phase images from 4DCT to the planned image. Dosimetric parameters from the 4D dose, were calculated and compared with those from the 3D dose.Results:There was no significant change of the dosimetric parameters for gross tumor volume (p > 0.05). The increase Dmean and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for liver were by 3.1% ± 3.3% (p = 0.003) and 2.8% ± 3.3% (p = 0.008), respectively, and for duodenum, they were decreased by 15.7% ± 11.2% (p = 0.003) and 15.1% ± 11.0% (p = 0.003), respectively. The Dmax and gEUD for stomach was decreased by 5.3% ± 5.8% (p = 0.003) and 9.7% ± 8.7% (p = 0.003), respectively. The Dmax and gEUD for right kidney was decreased by 11.2% ± 16.2% (p = 0.003) and 14.9% ± 16.8% (p = 0.005), respectively. For left kidney, Dmax and gEUD were decreased by 11.4% ± 11.0% (p = 0.003) and 12.8% ± 12.1% (p = 0.005), respectively. The NTCP values for duodenum and stomach were decreased by 8.4% ± 5.8% (p = 0.003) and 17.2% ± 13.7% (p = 0.003), respectively.Conclusions:The four‐dimensional dose with a more realistic dose calculation accounting for respiratory motion revealed no significant difference in target coverage and potentially significant change in the physical and biological dosimetric parameters in normal organs during free‐breathing treatment.
Title: Four‐dimensional dose evaluation using deformable image registration in radiotherapy for liver cancer
Description:
Purpose:In order to evaluate the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion on the dose delivered to the target volume and critical organs during free‐breathing radiotherapy, a four‐dimensional dose was evaluated using deformable image registration (DIR).
Methods:Four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images were acquired for 11 patients who were treated for liver cancer.
Internal target volume‐based treatment planning and dose calculation (3D dose) were performed using the end‐exhalation phase images.
The four‐dimensional dose (4D dose) was calculated based on DIR of all phase images from 4DCT to the planned image.
Dosimetric parameters from the 4D dose, were calculated and compared with those from the 3D dose.
Results:There was no significant change of the dosimetric parameters for gross tumor volume (p > 0.
05).
The increase Dmean and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for liver were by 3.
1% ± 3.
3% (p = 0.
003) and 2.
8% ± 3.
3% (p = 0.
008), respectively, and for duodenum, they were decreased by 15.
7% ± 11.
2% (p = 0.
003) and 15.
1% ± 11.
0% (p = 0.
003), respectively.
The Dmax and gEUD for stomach was decreased by 5.
3% ± 5.
8% (p = 0.
003) and 9.
7% ± 8.
7% (p = 0.
003), respectively.
The Dmax and gEUD for right kidney was decreased by 11.
2% ± 16.
2% (p = 0.
003) and 14.
9% ± 16.
8% (p = 0.
005), respectively.
For left kidney, Dmax and gEUD were decreased by 11.
4% ± 11.
0% (p = 0.
003) and 12.
8% ± 12.
1% (p = 0.
005), respectively.
The NTCP values for duodenum and stomach were decreased by 8.
4% ± 5.
8% (p = 0.
003) and 17.
2% ± 13.
7% (p = 0.
003), respectively.
Conclusions:The four‐dimensional dose with a more realistic dose calculation accounting for respiratory motion revealed no significant difference in target coverage and potentially significant change in the physical and biological dosimetric parameters in normal organs during free‐breathing treatment.

Related Results

High-performance image registration algorithms for multi-core processors
High-performance image registration algorithms for multi-core processors
Deformable registration consists of aligning two or more 3D images into a common coordinate frame. Fusing multiple images in this fashion quantifies changes in organ shape, size, a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract 7197: Elacridar sensitizes liver cancer to the PKC-inhibitor ICA-1S
Abstract 7197: Elacridar sensitizes liver cancer to the PKC-inhibitor ICA-1S
Abstract Liver cancer is a disease in which cancer cells form in the tissues of the liver. Globally, liver cancer is one of the most frequent fatal malignancies; in ...
Radiotherapy refusal in breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery
Radiotherapy refusal in breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery
Abstract Background Although radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery has been the standard treatment for breast cancer, some people still refus...
Liver Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning: Enhancing Early Detection and Survival Analysis
Liver Cancer Prediction Using Machine Learning: Enhancing Early Detection and Survival Analysis
Liver cancer is still one of the most lethal cancers in the world, with consistently increasing rates in the United States that are caused by rising rates of obesity, rates of hepa...

Back to Top