Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

International Harmonisation: A Key Challenge for Mechanical Components Codes and Standards

View through CrossRef
Many Code Comparisons have been done by different organizations. The differences are better and better known by Code Development Organizations like ASME, AFCEN, JSME, KEPIC, CSA and NIKIET. This paper uses the last MDEP (Multinational Design Evaluation Program) comparison for class 1 components to classify differences in different aspects: - National regulatory requirements - Technical differences - Scope differences. Few examples are selected to confirm needs of harmonization in different areas like: documentation, design rules, materials, product specifications, welding and non destructive examination personal qualifications. The paper concludes on selected topics proposed for harmonization by AFCEN. The objectives of this paper is to discuss technical harmonization of Nuclear Codes and Standards, based on French long experience in Codes and Standards used for design-fabrication and operation of nuclear components (mainly pressure retaining components). After a long period of use of ASME Section III code, during the Westinghouse licensing process, AFCEN (AREVA, EDF and the major manufacturers) decided to develop their own AFCEN French Codes. The 1st version has been issued in 1980 and the last one in 2007, completed by annual addendum. During more than 20 years the 2 Codes, RCC-M and ASME Section III, have leave separately, with different constraints like industrial history, localisation of fabrication, more new plants in France than in USA, different R&D programs to support Code improvement… Recently a detailed review of differences for class 1 vessel has showed under a “general global quality equivalence”, a lot of differences in the Code development process, in the Code organization, in the scopes, in the State of the Art fulfillment, in ageing consideration at the design stage, in relation with national or international regulations, in term of standards used or complementary specification needs… The harmonization of Codes and Standards is possible under an important effort to move toward new ideas, more international rules and with a strong support of national safety authorities.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Title: International Harmonisation: A Key Challenge for Mechanical Components Codes and Standards
Description:
Many Code Comparisons have been done by different organizations.
The differences are better and better known by Code Development Organizations like ASME, AFCEN, JSME, KEPIC, CSA and NIKIET.
This paper uses the last MDEP (Multinational Design Evaluation Program) comparison for class 1 components to classify differences in different aspects: - National regulatory requirements - Technical differences - Scope differences.
Few examples are selected to confirm needs of harmonization in different areas like: documentation, design rules, materials, product specifications, welding and non destructive examination personal qualifications.
The paper concludes on selected topics proposed for harmonization by AFCEN.
The objectives of this paper is to discuss technical harmonization of Nuclear Codes and Standards, based on French long experience in Codes and Standards used for design-fabrication and operation of nuclear components (mainly pressure retaining components).
After a long period of use of ASME Section III code, during the Westinghouse licensing process, AFCEN (AREVA, EDF and the major manufacturers) decided to develop their own AFCEN French Codes.
The 1st version has been issued in 1980 and the last one in 2007, completed by annual addendum.
During more than 20 years the 2 Codes, RCC-M and ASME Section III, have leave separately, with different constraints like industrial history, localisation of fabrication, more new plants in France than in USA, different R&D programs to support Code improvement… Recently a detailed review of differences for class 1 vessel has showed under a “general global quality equivalence”, a lot of differences in the Code development process, in the Code organization, in the scopes, in the State of the Art fulfillment, in ageing consideration at the design stage, in relation with national or international regulations, in term of standards used or complementary specification needs… The harmonization of Codes and Standards is possible under an important effort to move toward new ideas, more international rules and with a strong support of national safety authorities.

Related Results

L’harmonisation internationale du droit privé
L’harmonisation internationale du droit privé
L’harmonisation des législations apparaît indispensable au développement de zones économiques d’échange comme le sont la Communauté européenne et le N.A.F.T.A. Elle se situe entre,...
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
Abstract Two instrumental series of events in the past several years have provided the impetus for API Subcommittee 2 (SC 2) to action a new strategy for the API ...
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
Ensuring quality teachers and quality teacher education programmes have been fundamental global concerns over the decades. High quality teachers are critical to the future developm...
Generalised array low‐density parity‐check codes
Generalised array low‐density parity‐check codes
In this study, using Group Permutation Low‐Density Parity‐Check (GP‐LDPC) codes, the authors generalise the concept of array Low‐Density Parity‐Check (LDPC) codes from fields of pr...
International and National Standards for Large Synthetic-Fiber Ropes
International and National Standards for Large Synthetic-Fiber Ropes
ABSTRACT Standards for large synthetic-fiber ropes are published by various national and international organizations. There are significant differences among thes...
Path Forward: Materials Data Modernization for ASME Codes and Standards in the Artificial Intelligence Era
Path Forward: Materials Data Modernization for ASME Codes and Standards in the Artificial Intelligence Era
Abstract Development of the ASME Materials Properties Database was initiated in the early 2010s to support the ASME Codes and Standards. As information technologies ...
Teaching and Engaging International Students
Teaching and Engaging International Students
International student mobility has been increasingly subject to turbulences in politics, culture, economics, natural disasters, and public health. The new decade has witnessed an u...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...

Back to Top