Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does the Proximity Effect occur through Non-Consious Processes? A Study Protocol
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Consumption of snacks and food can be reduced by placing them further away from an individual, known as the Proximity Effect. This effect is generally thought to be robust, and observable between when snacks are presented at 20cm and 70cm. It is assumed that this effect occurs without conscious awareness or processing, but no study has experimentally tested whether the effect occurs via non-conscious processing. Method: A sample of 84 individuals is targeted, with each individual being assigned to one of four conditions via computerised random number sequence. A 2(Distance; 20cm, 70cm) x 2(Attention State; Distraction/Video, Control/No Video) between subjects design is implemented, with all individuals being presented with a bowl containing 250g of M&M’s. Individuals will either be asked to watch a 5-minute video clip, or sit quietly for 5 minutes. Snack consumption is measured at two levels: likelihood of consumption (any snack consumed vs none consumed), and actual consumption (continuous, measured in grams). Snacks will be removed after the 5 minute period, with individuals then being asked to complete a short questionnaire. Analysis: A binary logistic regression will be conducted to test for differences in likelihood of consumption. Actual consumption will be analysed through a 2x2 ANCOVA. Covariates of Perceived Effort and Visual Salience will be included in models for both analyses to assess the influence of these factors. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted for when outliers, those who were aware of the study intent, and those influenced by their environment are removed from analysis. All outcomes will be reported.Discussion: The proposed study will assess whether individuals consume more snacks when presented closer (proximity effect), as well as if consumption is higher when watching a short video clip, and the interaction between the two factors. Outcomes of the study will allow researchers to determine whether the proximity effect is likely to occur via non-conscious processing and without conscious awareness, or whether the effect occurs while individuals are aware of their behaviour. The results may influence future research and choice architects to ensure less-healthy snacks are placed further away if individuals are distracted with another stimulus to prevent mindless eating.
Title: Does the Proximity Effect occur through Non-Consious Processes? A Study Protocol
Description:
Introduction: Consumption of snacks and food can be reduced by placing them further away from an individual, known as the Proximity Effect.
This effect is generally thought to be robust, and observable between when snacks are presented at 20cm and 70cm.
It is assumed that this effect occurs without conscious awareness or processing, but no study has experimentally tested whether the effect occurs via non-conscious processing.
Method: A sample of 84 individuals is targeted, with each individual being assigned to one of four conditions via computerised random number sequence.
A 2(Distance; 20cm, 70cm) x 2(Attention State; Distraction/Video, Control/No Video) between subjects design is implemented, with all individuals being presented with a bowl containing 250g of M&M’s.
Individuals will either be asked to watch a 5-minute video clip, or sit quietly for 5 minutes.
Snack consumption is measured at two levels: likelihood of consumption (any snack consumed vs none consumed), and actual consumption (continuous, measured in grams).
Snacks will be removed after the 5 minute period, with individuals then being asked to complete a short questionnaire.
Analysis: A binary logistic regression will be conducted to test for differences in likelihood of consumption.
Actual consumption will be analysed through a 2x2 ANCOVA.
Covariates of Perceived Effort and Visual Salience will be included in models for both analyses to assess the influence of these factors.
Sensitivity analysis will be conducted for when outliers, those who were aware of the study intent, and those influenced by their environment are removed from analysis.
All outcomes will be reported.
Discussion: The proposed study will assess whether individuals consume more snacks when presented closer (proximity effect), as well as if consumption is higher when watching a short video clip, and the interaction between the two factors.
Outcomes of the study will allow researchers to determine whether the proximity effect is likely to occur via non-conscious processing and without conscious awareness, or whether the effect occurs while individuals are aware of their behaviour.
The results may influence future research and choice architects to ensure less-healthy snacks are placed further away if individuals are distracted with another stimulus to prevent mindless eating.
Related Results
Investigating the Proximity Effect in a Competitive Food Environment: A study protocol
Investigating the Proximity Effect in a Competitive Food Environment: A study protocol
Obesity and overweight levels are rising nationally, despite recent governmental advertising campaigns being implemented to tackle the prevalence rise at a population level. Theref...
Exploring the role of Effort within the Proximity Effect: A Study Protocol
Exploring the role of Effort within the Proximity Effect: A Study Protocol
Obesity prevalence is increasing around the globe, with interventions manipulating the decision environment thought to have a large potential to change behaviour. One such simple y...
Exploring the role of Visual Salience within the Proximity Effect
Exploring the role of Visual Salience within the Proximity Effect
Research into why the proximity effect occurs and understanding of the underpinning mechanisms is relatively scarce. Attempts have been made to explore whether cognitive load and p...
Storm Warnings: Time Sensitive Proximity
Storm Warnings: Time Sensitive Proximity
Weather-predictive tasks during high risk severe weather events are carried out for the common good of the community by virtual teams of weather professionals. Severe weather predi...
Is your memory better than mine? Investigating the mechanisms and determinants of the memory conformity effect using a modified MORI technique
Is your memory better than mine? Investigating the mechanisms and determinants of the memory conformity effect using a modified MORI technique
SummaryThe paper presents the memory conformity effect phenomenon, which assumes that information about the same event that a witness acquires from another witness (misinformation)...
Treatment of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Children Post-Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center’s Experience
Treatment of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Children Post-Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center’s Experience
Introduction Acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR) can negatively impact renal allografts outcomes. To date, there has not been a consistent therapeutic approach to manage aAMR....
Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019
Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019
Background:Reproducibility is a central tenant of research. We aimed to synthesize the literature on reproducibility and describe its epidemiological characteristics, including how...
Bayesian hypothesis testing and estimation under the marginalized random-effects meta-analysis model
Bayesian hypothesis testing and estimation under the marginalized random-effects meta-analysis model
AbstractMeta-analysis methods are used to synthesize results of multiple studies on the same topic. The most frequently used statistical model in meta-analysis is the random-effect...