Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

What Remains is Future: Kostas Axelos and Heideggerian-Marxism. An Encounter with Kostas Axelos, "An Introduction to Future Ways of Thought: On Marx and Heidegger"

View through CrossRef
In this book encounter with Kostas Axelos' Introduction to Future Ways of Thought: On Marx and Heidegger, I introduce Axelos as an imaginative reader of Marx and Heidegger. His approach draws on their parallels to imagine what is possible. I argue that Axelos makes three unique contributions to the Heideggerian-Marxist project. First, Axelos’ understanding of the planetary epoch (globalization) relies on a reading of Marx that is heavily influenced by Heidegger’s concept of “world”. Second, he builds on the idea of an “open world” meant to combat the technological over-determination characteristic of the planetary era. Third, Axelos preserves the significance of Heidegger (technology) and Marx (capitalism) to outline the possibilities of a thinking that, as of yet, remain a future undertaking. I conclude with some ideas about how Axelos' thinking may be further developed.
University of Windsor Leddy Library
Title: What Remains is Future: Kostas Axelos and Heideggerian-Marxism. An Encounter with Kostas Axelos, "An Introduction to Future Ways of Thought: On Marx and Heidegger"
Description:
In this book encounter with Kostas Axelos' Introduction to Future Ways of Thought: On Marx and Heidegger, I introduce Axelos as an imaginative reader of Marx and Heidegger.
His approach draws on their parallels to imagine what is possible.
I argue that Axelos makes three unique contributions to the Heideggerian-Marxist project.
First, Axelos’ understanding of the planetary epoch (globalization) relies on a reading of Marx that is heavily influenced by Heidegger’s concept of “world”.
 Second, he builds on the idea of an “open world” meant to combat the technological over-determination characteristic of the planetary era.
Third, Axelos preserves the significance of Heidegger (technology) and Marx (capitalism) to outline the possibilities of a thinking that, as of yet, remain a future undertaking.
I conclude with some ideas about how Axelos' thinking may be further developed.

Related Results

Kostas Axelos - L’exil, l’errance, le passage
Kostas Axelos - L’exil, l’errance, le passage
La vie et l’œuvre de Kostas Axelos peuvent être réunies et saisies selon les figures et les métamorphoses d’un voyage, voyage ininterrompu dont il n’a cessé de déplacer et d’approf...
Dasein and the Question of the Heterogenous Film Viewer: A Commentary on Loht’s Heideggerian Phenomenology of Film
Dasein and the Question of the Heterogenous Film Viewer: A Commentary on Loht’s Heideggerian Phenomenology of Film
In response to Shawn Loht’s 2017 project delineating a Heideggerian phenomenology of film, Phenomenology of Film: A Heideggerian Account of the Film Experience, I examine how produ...
Philosophy in France
Philosophy in France
In fact, only one book on or around Marxism has been received for survey during the year that is past, though there are perhaps few British philosophers who would see anything for ...
Future-making in Burkina Faso: ordering and materializing temporal relations in the Bagré Growth Pole Project
Future-making in Burkina Faso: ordering and materializing temporal relations in the Bagré Growth Pole Project
Abstract. Visions for the future drive current practices and shape daily lives. Recently, the future has also become a ubiquitous theme in the social sciences. Starting from the ob...
The human remains from Tomb MMA 514 in North Asasif
The human remains from Tomb MMA 514 in North Asasif
The tombs of the North Asasif Necropolis have been the subject of archaeological excavations for more than a century. Mainly dating to the Middle Kingdom, the majority of these tom...
Beyond “Separate Spheres”: Feminism and the Cultural Studies/Political Economy Debate
Beyond “Separate Spheres”: Feminism and the Cultural Studies/Political Economy Debate
When scholars debate the theoretical, methodological, and political differences between cultural studies and political economy through allusions to feminist sites of conflict such ...
Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (1977)
Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (1977)
This article focuses on two of the most enduring terms in Raymond Williams’s Marxism and Literature: “dominant, residual, emergent” and “structures of feeling.” Williams’s theory o...
Marx the Fichtean
Marx the Fichtean
We ignore the history of philosophy at our peril. Engels, who typically conflates Marx and Marxism, points to the relation of Marxism to the tradition while also denying it. In his...

Back to Top