Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Archaeology and first-century Nazareth
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Exploring what the evidence considered in this book tells us about first-century Nazareth, this chapter discusses how little we know about Nazareth as a place from written sources. Archaeological research is shown to have produced much more information about the physical form of the first-century settlement at Nazareth, its everyday life, culture, and economy. The possible identification of the Sisters of Nazareth site with Jesus’ childhood home is then considered, including a brief consideration of the historical evidence for Jesus and the possible implications of such an identification. This concludes with the author’s view that it is currently impossible either to prove or refute the interpretation that this was the house where Jesus was brought up. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence and interpretation shed much new light on first-century Nazareth as a whole and in this way give a new understanding of Jesus’ Nazareth.
Title: Archaeology and first-century Nazareth
Description:
Abstract
Exploring what the evidence considered in this book tells us about first-century Nazareth, this chapter discusses how little we know about Nazareth as a place from written sources.
Archaeological research is shown to have produced much more information about the physical form of the first-century settlement at Nazareth, its everyday life, culture, and economy.
The possible identification of the Sisters of Nazareth site with Jesus’ childhood home is then considered, including a brief consideration of the historical evidence for Jesus and the possible implications of such an identification.
This concludes with the author’s view that it is currently impossible either to prove or refute the interpretation that this was the house where Jesus was brought up.
Nevertheless, archaeological evidence and interpretation shed much new light on first-century Nazareth as a whole and in this way give a new understanding of Jesus’ Nazareth.
Related Results
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
The main recommendations of the panel report can be summarised under five key headings: HUMANITY The Panel recommends recognition that research in this field should be geared tow...
Landscape Archaeology
Landscape Archaeology
Landscape archaeology is the study of how people interacted with their surroundings, as evidenced by the archaeological record. This may appear to be an all-encompassing remit, but...
Processual Archaeology
Processual Archaeology
Processual archaeology (also known as new or scientific archaeology) is a theoretical movement rooted in the 1960s–1970s (although some argue both for an earlier start and for its ...
Reflections on the 1943 ‘Conference on the Future of
Archaeology’
Reflections on the 1943 ‘Conference on the Future of
Archaeology’
At the height of the Second World War the Institute of Archaeology hosted a
conference in London to map out the post-war future for archaeology. Over a
...
The publication Starinar as an organ of the SAS Institute of Archaeology
The publication Starinar as an organ of the SAS Institute of Archaeology
The lack of appropriate conditions for the work of the Serbian Archaeological
Society after Liberation led to new chapters in the history of Serbian
archaeology. One of the b...
Introduction: Writing Histories of Archaeology
Introduction: Writing Histories of Archaeology
Any one of several organic analogies, particularly that of the Tree of Knowledge, might usefully serve as the leitmotif of this volume, and to help justify our choice of the plural...
The Legacy of Mesopotamia
The Legacy of Mesopotamia
Abstract
What have the civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia bequeathed to us? What is their legacy to us, the inhabitants of a world they never could have imagined? ...
A History of Archaeology in Brazil (2001).
A History of Archaeology in Brazil (2001).
The history of archaeology in Brazil has been divided into phases following different criteria. Most authors consider that archaeology should have its own disciplinary history, not...

