Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Climate Implications of Ending Global Poverty

View through CrossRef
Abstract Previous studies have explored potential conflicts between ending poverty and limiting global warming by focusing on the carbon emissions linked to the consumption of the world’s poorest. Here we instead focus on economic growth as the main driver of poverty alleviation and estimate the emissions associated with the economic growth needed to eradicate poverty. With this framing, eradicating poverty requires not only to increase the consumption of poor people but also the consumption of non-poor people in poor countries. Even in this more pessimistic framing and with historical energy- and carbon-intensity patterns, the global emissions increase associated with eradicating extreme poverty is small, at 2.37 GtCO2e per year or 4.9% of 2019 global emissions, relative to a scenario without poverty alleviation. These additional emissions would not affect materially the climate change challenge for the rest of the world: global energy emissions would need to be reduced by 2.08 GtCO2e per year, instead of 2.0 GtCO2e per year needed in the absence of any progress towards extreme poverty eradication. Lower inequality, higher energy efficiency, and decarbonization of energy can significantly ease this trade-off: assuming the best historical performance in all countries, in part a conservative scenario considering recent progress in green technologies, the additional emissions for poverty eradication in 2050 are reduced by 90%. At the global level, therefore, the need to eradicate extreme poverty cannot be used as a justification for reducing the world’s climate ambitions. When trade-offs exist for specific policies or investments, the eradication of extreme poverty can be prioritized with negligible emissions implications. More ambitious poverty targets require more economic growth in more countries which creates more acute trade-offs. The estimated emissions increase in 2050 of eradicating poverty is 7.4 GtCO2e (or 15.3% of 2019 emissions) with the lower-middle-income poverty line at $3.65 per day and 22.1 GtCO2e (or 45.7% of 2019 emissions) with the $6.85 upper-middle-income poverty line. The challenge to align the world’s development and climate objectives is not in reconciling extreme poverty alleviation with climate objectives but in providing middle-income standards of living in a sustainable manner.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: The Climate Implications of Ending Global Poverty
Description:
Abstract Previous studies have explored potential conflicts between ending poverty and limiting global warming by focusing on the carbon emissions linked to the consumption of the world’s poorest.
Here we instead focus on economic growth as the main driver of poverty alleviation and estimate the emissions associated with the economic growth needed to eradicate poverty.
With this framing, eradicating poverty requires not only to increase the consumption of poor people but also the consumption of non-poor people in poor countries.
Even in this more pessimistic framing and with historical energy- and carbon-intensity patterns, the global emissions increase associated with eradicating extreme poverty is small, at 2.
37 GtCO2e per year or 4.
9% of 2019 global emissions, relative to a scenario without poverty alleviation.
These additional emissions would not affect materially the climate change challenge for the rest of the world: global energy emissions would need to be reduced by 2.
08 GtCO2e per year, instead of 2.
0 GtCO2e per year needed in the absence of any progress towards extreme poverty eradication.
Lower inequality, higher energy efficiency, and decarbonization of energy can significantly ease this trade-off: assuming the best historical performance in all countries, in part a conservative scenario considering recent progress in green technologies, the additional emissions for poverty eradication in 2050 are reduced by 90%.
At the global level, therefore, the need to eradicate extreme poverty cannot be used as a justification for reducing the world’s climate ambitions.
When trade-offs exist for specific policies or investments, the eradication of extreme poverty can be prioritized with negligible emissions implications.
More ambitious poverty targets require more economic growth in more countries which creates more acute trade-offs.
The estimated emissions increase in 2050 of eradicating poverty is 7.
4 GtCO2e (or 15.
3% of 2019 emissions) with the lower-middle-income poverty line at $3.
65 per day and 22.
1 GtCO2e (or 45.
7% of 2019 emissions) with the $6.
85 upper-middle-income poverty line.
The challenge to align the world’s development and climate objectives is not in reconciling extreme poverty alleviation with climate objectives but in providing middle-income standards of living in a sustainable manner.

Related Results

“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Consider, for instance, you and your family have lived around a place where you enjoyed the flora and fauna of the land as well as the natural environment. Fishing and farming were...
Climate and Culture
Climate and Culture
Climate is, presently, a heatedly discussed topic. Concerns about the environmental, economic, political and social consequences of climate change are of central interest in academ...
On poverty and the persistence of poverty in Benin
On poverty and the persistence of poverty in Benin
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the determinants of poverty and the persistence of poverty in Benin using a longitudinal data for the years 2006-2011. The paper also...
A Synergistic Imperative: An Integrated Policy and Education Framework for Navigating the Climate Nexus
A Synergistic Imperative: An Integrated Policy and Education Framework for Navigating the Climate Nexus
Climate change acts as a systemic multiplier of threats, exacerbating interconnected global crises that jeopardize food security, biodiversity, and environmental health. These chal...
Urban Poverty
Urban Poverty
Eradicating poverty in all its forms remains one of the greatest challenges facing humanity. For this reason, it was the primary sustainable development goal set for the United Nat...
Climate-linked bonds
Climate-linked bonds
Climate-linked bonds are an innovative financial tool designed to address the growing challenges of climate change. These bonds, ideally issued by governments and supranational org...

Back to Top