Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The impact of general anesthesia versus neuraxial anesthesia on obstetric outcomes of elective cesarean sections

View through CrossRef
Objective. To determine which type of anesthesia, general or spinal, causes less amount of blood loss in elective cesarean section. Patients and methods. An observational randomized controlled study including 300 women was conducted at the Al-Zahraa University Maternity Hospital. Two patient groups were identified: group G (general anesthesia) (n = 150) and group S (spinal anesthesia) (n = 150). All patients underwent elective cesarean section with identical operative steps by the same surgeon. Anesthesia, general or spinal, was standard. Data were collected, including age, parity, pre- and postoperative heart rate and blood pressure, pre- and postoperative complete blood count (on day 3), type of anesthesia, duration of surgery, complications (atonic postpartum hemorrhage, uterine extension), postoperative urinary output, need for blood transfusion, fainting and headache attacks, time to breastfeeding, ambulation, and passing flatus. Data on postoperative analgesia were also obtained, including time to first analgesic request and number of doses taken. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was estimated using the acute normovolemic hemodilution technique. Results. When using changes in hemoglobin levels to estimate blood loss, group S showed statistically significantly less blood loss than group G, with a mean difference of 103.7 mL (p < 0.05). When using hematocrit levels, group S showed statistically significantly less blood loss than group G, with a mean difference of 114 mL (p < 0.05). Headache attacks were more frequent in group S (78) than in group G (19) (p < 0.05). Group S started breastfeeding 5 hours earlier than group G (p < 0.05). Group S started postoperative ambulation 4 hours earlier than group G (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding time to first analgesic request, heart rate, blood pressure, urinary output, and fainting attacks in the postoperative period. Conclusion. Spinal anesthesia has certain advantages over general anesthesia: higher postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, less need for analgesia, earlier ambulation, and earlier initiation of breastfeeding. Key words: spinal anesthesia, general anesthesia, cesarean section
Title: The impact of general anesthesia versus neuraxial anesthesia on obstetric outcomes of elective cesarean sections
Description:
Objective.
To determine which type of anesthesia, general or spinal, causes less amount of blood loss in elective cesarean section.
Patients and methods.
An observational randomized controlled study including 300 women was conducted at the Al-Zahraa University Maternity Hospital.
Two patient groups were identified: group G (general anesthesia) (n = 150) and group S (spinal anesthesia) (n = 150).
All patients underwent elective cesarean section with identical operative steps by the same surgeon.
Anesthesia, general or spinal, was standard.
Data were collected, including age, parity, pre- and postoperative heart rate and blood pressure, pre- and postoperative complete blood count (on day 3), type of anesthesia, duration of surgery, complications (atonic postpartum hemorrhage, uterine extension), postoperative urinary output, need for blood transfusion, fainting and headache attacks, time to breastfeeding, ambulation, and passing flatus.
Data on postoperative analgesia were also obtained, including time to first analgesic request and number of doses taken.
The amount of intraoperative blood loss was estimated using the acute normovolemic hemodilution technique.
Results.
When using changes in hemoglobin levels to estimate blood loss, group S showed statistically significantly less blood loss than group G, with a mean difference of 103.
7 mL (p < 0.
05).
When using hematocrit levels, group S showed statistically significantly less blood loss than group G, with a mean difference of 114 mL (p < 0.
05).
Headache attacks were more frequent in group S (78) than in group G (19) (p < 0.
05).
Group S started breastfeeding 5 hours earlier than group G (p < 0.
05).
Group S started postoperative ambulation 4 hours earlier than group G (p < 0.
05).
There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding time to first analgesic request, heart rate, blood pressure, urinary output, and fainting attacks in the postoperative period.
Conclusion.
Spinal anesthesia has certain advantages over general anesthesia: higher postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, less need for analgesia, earlier ambulation, and earlier initiation of breastfeeding.
Key words: spinal anesthesia, general anesthesia, cesarean section.

Related Results

Impact of General Anesthesia and Regional Anesthesia on Patient Satisfaction and Pain Management in Cesarian Deliveries
Impact of General Anesthesia and Regional Anesthesia on Patient Satisfaction and Pain Management in Cesarian Deliveries
Background: Cesarean section rates are rising globally, underscoring the importance of optimizing anesthetic techniques for maternal safety and satisfaction. Despite widespread use...
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The succes...
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Hindfoot, Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The occurrence of venous thromboembolisms (VTE) in the management of foo...
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Obstetric admission and maternal mortality in the intensive care unit in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background Obstetric complications are a major contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low-resource settings such as many countries in Africa. Inte...
The Influence of Timing of Elective Cesarean Section on Neonatal Resuscitation Risk
The Influence of Timing of Elective Cesarean Section on Neonatal Resuscitation Risk
The number of cesarean sections (CS) performed worldwide has increased. Between 2000 and 2015, the percentage of babies born via cesarean section nearly doubled, rising from 12% in...
Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review
Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review
SummaryWe conducted a narrative review in six areas of obstetric emergencies: category‐1 caesarean section; difficult and failed airway; massive obstetric haemorrhage; hypertensive...

Back to Top