Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An Anthropologist Joins the Long-Term Ecological Research Network

View through CrossRef
Environmental science has no room for theoretical or methodological hegemony, and questions cannot be asked in the absence of purposeful design. Education must simultaneously engage students in thinking and doing, ideally in collaboration. Communication is a two-way process in which scientists are challenged to be credible and legitimate in conveying salient results to diverse audiences. Collaboration is about leveraging individual skills toward a common purpose, which can only succeed when trust exists between investigators. I was trained as an ecological anthropologist with an emphasis on behavioral and ecosystem ecology at the University of Montana and the Pennsylvania State University. I have conducted archaeological, behavioral, cultural, and historical research throughout the western and the southeastern United States, as well as in several countries in lowland South America, the Dominican Republic, and southern France. Currently, I am professor and head of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Georgia. In 1997, I was invited to join the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program at the Coweeta site (CWT). CWT is based in the eastern deciduous forest of the southern Appalachian Mountains, and I was brought in to collaborate on regionalization of what had been exclusively a site-based project. Just prior to joining CWT, I had been involved for several years in regional conservation activities in Paraguay and Bolivia. Since 2002, I have served as principal investigator of CWT, leading the successful grant renewal efforts in 2002 and 2008. I recently completed the 2014 renewal effort, which was successful. There has been a dramatic shift over the period of my involvement in the LTER program in attitudes within the network to regionalization and participation by scientists from disciplines other than ecology (Gragson and Grove 2006; Robertson et al. 2012). Several colleagues and I have helped to foster this shift through our involvement on the LTER Social Science Standing Committee (1998–present), leadership in the LTER planning activities (2004–2007), and service on the LTER Executive Board (2008–2011). My experiences in the LTER program have influenced my ideas about the nature and conduct of environmental research.
Title: An Anthropologist Joins the Long-Term Ecological Research Network
Description:
Environmental science has no room for theoretical or methodological hegemony, and questions cannot be asked in the absence of purposeful design.
Education must simultaneously engage students in thinking and doing, ideally in collaboration.
Communication is a two-way process in which scientists are challenged to be credible and legitimate in conveying salient results to diverse audiences.
Collaboration is about leveraging individual skills toward a common purpose, which can only succeed when trust exists between investigators.
I was trained as an ecological anthropologist with an emphasis on behavioral and ecosystem ecology at the University of Montana and the Pennsylvania State University.
I have conducted archaeological, behavioral, cultural, and historical research throughout the western and the southeastern United States, as well as in several countries in lowland South America, the Dominican Republic, and southern France.
Currently, I am professor and head of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Georgia.
In 1997, I was invited to join the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program at the Coweeta site (CWT).
CWT is based in the eastern deciduous forest of the southern Appalachian Mountains, and I was brought in to collaborate on regionalization of what had been exclusively a site-based project.
Just prior to joining CWT, I had been involved for several years in regional conservation activities in Paraguay and Bolivia.
Since 2002, I have served as principal investigator of CWT, leading the successful grant renewal efforts in 2002 and 2008.
I recently completed the 2014 renewal effort, which was successful.
There has been a dramatic shift over the period of my involvement in the LTER program in attitudes within the network to regionalization and participation by scientists from disciplines other than ecology (Gragson and Grove 2006; Robertson et al.
2012).
Several colleagues and I have helped to foster this shift through our involvement on the LTER Social Science Standing Committee (1998–present), leadership in the LTER planning activities (2004–2007), and service on the LTER Executive Board (2008–2011).
My experiences in the LTER program have influenced my ideas about the nature and conduct of environmental research.

Related Results

From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Abstract Under the influence of natural factors and human activities, the ecological environment functions in the source region of the Yellow River in China have been degra...
Constructing and optimizing ecological network at county and town scale: The case of Shilin County, China
Constructing and optimizing ecological network at county and town scale: The case of Shilin County, China
Abstract High-intensive land development had led to increasingly fragmented urban habitat patches, and the contradiction between regional development and ecological protect...
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Based on the vegetation ecological quality index retrieved by satellite remote sensing in the karst areas of Guangxi in 2000–2019, the status of the ecological restoration of the v...
Integrating Ecological Importance and Risk for Restoration Zoning and Ecological Water Demand in the Shiyang River Basin
Integrating Ecological Importance and Risk for Restoration Zoning and Ecological Water Demand in the Shiyang River Basin
Abstract Effective ecological protection and restoration in arid inland river basins requires a holistic perspective of territorial spatial planning that balances conservat...

Back to Top