Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial

View through CrossRef
Background— This study reports the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on hospitalizations in patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or ICD-CRT in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT). Methods and Results— Hospitalization rates and lengths of hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups. At the 18-month follow-up, the numbers of patients hospitalized for any cause were similar in the ICD (n=351, 38.8%) and ICD-CRT (n=331, 30.0%) groups. The number of patients hospitalized for heart failure was significantly lower in the ICD-CRT (n=101, 11.3%) compared with the ICD (n=141, 15.6%; P =0.003) group. The number of patients hospitalized for a device-related indication was similar in the ICD-CRT group (n=147, 16.4%) and ICD group (n=126, 13.9%; P =0.148). The total number of hospitalizations for any cause (n=1448 versus n=1553; P =0.042), any cardiovascular cause (n=667 versus n=790; P =0.017), and any heart failure cause (n=385 versus n=505; P <0.0001) was significantly lower in ICD-CRT group compared with the ICD group, whereas the number of hospitalizations for device-related causes was significantly higher in the ICD-CRT group compared with the ICD group (246 versus 159; P <0.001). Although the reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure in the CRT-ICD group was offset by an increased number of hospitalizations for device-related indications, the length of hospital stay for any cause was significantly shorter in the ICD-CRT group (8.83±13.30 days) compared with the ICD group (9.59±14.40 days; P =0.005). Conclusion— ICD-CRT therapy significantly reduces hospitalizations and total days in hospital in patients with New York Heart Association class II/III heart failure compared with ICD therapy despite increased admissions for device-related indications. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00251251.
Title: Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
Description:
Background— This study reports the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on hospitalizations in patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or ICD-CRT in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT).
Methods and Results— Hospitalization rates and lengths of hospital stay were compared between the 2 groups.
At the 18-month follow-up, the numbers of patients hospitalized for any cause were similar in the ICD (n=351, 38.
8%) and ICD-CRT (n=331, 30.
0%) groups.
The number of patients hospitalized for heart failure was significantly lower in the ICD-CRT (n=101, 11.
3%) compared with the ICD (n=141, 15.
6%; P =0.
003) group.
The number of patients hospitalized for a device-related indication was similar in the ICD-CRT group (n=147, 16.
4%) and ICD group (n=126, 13.
9%; P =0.
148).
The total number of hospitalizations for any cause (n=1448 versus n=1553; P =0.
042), any cardiovascular cause (n=667 versus n=790; P =0.
017), and any heart failure cause (n=385 versus n=505; P <0.
0001) was significantly lower in ICD-CRT group compared with the ICD group, whereas the number of hospitalizations for device-related causes was significantly higher in the ICD-CRT group compared with the ICD group (246 versus 159; P <0.
001).
Although the reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure in the CRT-ICD group was offset by an increased number of hospitalizations for device-related indications, the length of hospital stay for any cause was significantly shorter in the ICD-CRT group (8.
83±13.
30 days) compared with the ICD group (9.
59±14.
40 days; P =0.
005).
Conclusion— ICD-CRT therapy significantly reduces hospitalizations and total days in hospital in patients with New York Heart Association class II/III heart failure compared with ICD therapy despite increased admissions for device-related indications.
Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.
clinicaltrials.
gov .
Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Related Results

Predictive value of left atrial remodeling for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Predictive value of left atrial remodeling for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Aim: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy varies significantly among patients, with one third of them failing to demonstrate left ventricular reverse ...
CONTINUOUS COMPRESSION WITHOUT DEFIBRILLATION FAVOURED NO SHORT-TERM SURVIVAL IN PROLONGED VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION
CONTINUOUS COMPRESSION WITHOUT DEFIBRILLATION FAVOURED NO SHORT-TERM SURVIVAL IN PROLONGED VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION
Objectives Aims: During the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Consensus Conference, compression first versus defibrillation first for sudden cardiac arrest wi...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
ONE-SHOCK VERSUS CONTINUOUS DEFIBRILLATION IN AN 8-MIN VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION CANINE MODEL OF CARDIAC ARREST
ONE-SHOCK VERSUS CONTINUOUS DEFIBRILLATION IN AN 8-MIN VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION CANINE MODEL OF CARDIAC ARREST
Objectives To investigate the resuscitation effect of a one-shock defibrillation protocol versus conventional continuous defibrillation with treatment variation i...
The COVID – 19 pandemic influence on hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive condition
The COVID – 19 pandemic influence on hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive condition
Abstract Aim To explore whether the COVID-19 pandemic influenced hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC...
Abstract 12159: Impact of Ischemic Heart Disease on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Analysis From National Inpatient Sample
Abstract 12159: Impact of Ischemic Heart Disease on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Analysis From National Inpatient Sample
Introduction: Comparative outcomes of hospitalizations for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) implantation procedures with and without coexisting Ischemic Heart Di...

Back to Top