Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Economics of Tort Law
View through CrossRef
Chapter 3 discusses economic analysis of optimal tort liability, focusing on the use of liability where private parties cannot provide optimal incentives through private ordering, and information is costly. It shows that the central motivations for tort liability—imperfect contracting and costly information—alter its optimal structure and incentive effects, both as applied to individual injurers and risk-imposers operating within organizations. Section 2 examines optimal tort liability in the context where liability is needed: where injurers and victims are “strangers” who cannot bargain over optimal risk prevention or responsibility for losses. Section 3 examines tort liability when injurers and victims are in a market relationship, as with products liability and medical malpractice. Section 4 extends the analysis of optimal tort liability to the situation where risk-imposers respond to information costs by conducting their activities through organizations, as is generally the case most important torts other than automobile accidents.
Title: Economics of Tort Law
Description:
Chapter 3 discusses economic analysis of optimal tort liability, focusing on the use of liability where private parties cannot provide optimal incentives through private ordering, and information is costly.
It shows that the central motivations for tort liability—imperfect contracting and costly information—alter its optimal structure and incentive effects, both as applied to individual injurers and risk-imposers operating within organizations.
Section 2 examines optimal tort liability in the context where liability is needed: where injurers and victims are “strangers” who cannot bargain over optimal risk prevention or responsibility for losses.
Section 3 examines tort liability when injurers and victims are in a market relationship, as with products liability and medical malpractice.
Section 4 extends the analysis of optimal tort liability to the situation where risk-imposers respond to information costs by conducting their activities through organizations, as is generally the case most important torts other than automobile accidents.
Related Results
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
The article examines the history of administrative tort law and administrative tort process as subsectors of administrative law and administrative process, their controversial and ...
How is Tort Law Political?
How is Tort Law Political?
Abstract
Chapter 16 addresses Gardner’s take on the particular relationship between tort and the political. Flagging of a link between tort and the political is most...
European Tort Law
European Tort Law
Abstract
This is the first introductory text book to European tort law. It brings together national tort law, comparative law, European Union (EU) law, and human rig...
Unifying Principles within Pluralist Tort Adjudication
Unifying Principles within Pluralist Tort Adjudication
Abstract
A healthy political society values diverse viewpoints and their associated moral theories. Recognizing as much, Jane Stapleton and numerous other tort schol...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Behavioral Economics and Tort Law
Behavioral Economics and Tort Law
The chapter discusses the contributions of cognitive psychology and behavioral studies to the research of tort law. These contributions, we show, relate to a wide range of issues i...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...

