Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Constraining Leviathan

View through CrossRef
In this chapter the place of Hobbes in relation to the twentieth-century crisis of civilization is explored through the writings of Schmitt and Oakeshott. The nature of the crisis is explored, and it becomes evident that the pernicious elements that one perceives as the contributory factors in the decline are what the other claims are the strengths which are being undermined by the crisis. Both Oakeshott and Schmitt are critics of liberalism, but whereas Schmitt sees parliamentary democracy as a weakness emanating from liberalism, Oakeshott believes that parliamentary democracy predates modern liberalism, and is one of the strengths of contemporary politics with the potential to resist the decline. Individuality, pluralism, the secret ballot, and the rule of law are for Schmitt unnecessary constraints contributory to the depoliticization of the political, undermining the capacity of the sovereign to determine, or decide who are friends and enemies.
Title: Constraining Leviathan
Description:
In this chapter the place of Hobbes in relation to the twentieth-century crisis of civilization is explored through the writings of Schmitt and Oakeshott.
The nature of the crisis is explored, and it becomes evident that the pernicious elements that one perceives as the contributory factors in the decline are what the other claims are the strengths which are being undermined by the crisis.
Both Oakeshott and Schmitt are critics of liberalism, but whereas Schmitt sees parliamentary democracy as a weakness emanating from liberalism, Oakeshott believes that parliamentary democracy predates modern liberalism, and is one of the strengths of contemporary politics with the potential to resist the decline.
Individuality, pluralism, the secret ballot, and the rule of law are for Schmitt unnecessary constraints contributory to the depoliticization of the political, undermining the capacity of the sovereign to determine, or decide who are friends and enemies.

Related Results

The Theocratic Leviathan
The Theocratic Leviathan
Hobbes’s views on church–state relations go well beyond Erastianism. Rather than claiming that the state holds supremacy over the church, Hobbes argued that church and state are id...
Léviathan Thot
Léviathan Thot
Ernesto Neto, Exhibitions, 2006, Regard...
Leviathan
Leviathan
Christian Zucconi, Exhibitions, 2014, Vanilla...
Im Schatten des Leviathan
Im Schatten des Leviathan
Gustav René Hocke, Biography, 2004, Deutscher Kunstverlag...
Monster Leviathan
Monster Leviathan
Aaron Betsky, Architecture, 2024, MIT Press...
Leviathan
Leviathan
Anish Kapoor, Notebooks, sketchbooks, 2011, Réunion des musées nationaux...
Mosaic Leviathan
Mosaic Leviathan
This chapter defends three connected claims. First, we can account for Hobbes’s turn towards the Hebrew Bible by understanding the place of biblical Israel in the political and rel...
A Limited Leviathan
A Limited Leviathan
The state social contract relationship between rulers and the ruled in civil society is fruitfully understood as a governing convention. This relationship is modeled with an indefi...

Back to Top