Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Formation and Development of the National Temples in the Capital of Baekje

View through CrossRef
The concept of ‘National Temples’ refers to significant temples that serve a political and social role within a specific nation, functioning as symbolic entities of the nation and utilizing Buddhism as a tool of governance. In Chapter 2, the concepts of national temples in China and Japan were discussed. In China, notable examples include the Yongning Temple in Luoyang, the Zhao Pengcheng Temple site in Yepsung during the Northern Wei and Northern Qi periods, and the Daxingshan Temple in Chang'an during the Sui Dynasty. These temples were distinguished from regular temples by their large Buddhist stupas, halls, and various Buddhist rituals, and were supported by the nation, with their costs borne by the government. Similarly, Japan operated a system of “Daiji” (Great Temples), such as Baekje Daiji (Daegwan Daiji) and Yakushiji, where the national managed and financially supported the temples. While the national temples in China and Japan shared Buddhist governance and ceremonial symbolism, they developed differently according to each nation's political context and city structures. Chapter 3 focuses on the establishment and development of national temples in Baekje. Baekje adopted Buddhism in 384 CE and constructed its first Buddhist temple in Hansan in 385 CE, marking an important symbolic architectural establishment for the capital. King Seong established the Dae Tongsa Temple in the capital of Ungjin in 527 CE, marking the beginning of national temples with political significance. The Dae Tongsa Temple was located at a key transportation hub near the Jeomincheon River, though early architectural remains are scarce, artifacts and roof tiles from the period were discovered. In 538 CE, King Seong moved the capital to Sabi, where the city’s defenses and structure were planned, and many temples were built, including important national temples such as the Jeongnimsa and Gunsuri temple site. Jeongnimsa was located in the heart of the Sabi capital and appears to have been constructed at a national level, while Gunsuri temple site had nation support but was of lower status compared to Jeongnimsa. Mireuksaji, established in the mid-7th century by King Mu’s queen, was the largest temple with notable architectural features like the nine-story wooden pagoda and stone pagoda. However, Mireuksaji was located in Iksan, not the capital of Sabi, and its construction may have continued after King Mu's death, making it difficult to classify as a national temple. Additionally, the Dae Gwan Temple found at the Wanggungni site appears to have been established by Silla for managing Baekje’s territory, thus unrelated to Baekje's national temples.
Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University
Title: Formation and Development of the National Temples in the Capital of Baekje
Description:
The concept of ‘National Temples’ refers to significant temples that serve a political and social role within a specific nation, functioning as symbolic entities of the nation and utilizing Buddhism as a tool of governance.
In Chapter 2, the concepts of national temples in China and Japan were discussed.
In China, notable examples include the Yongning Temple in Luoyang, the Zhao Pengcheng Temple site in Yepsung during the Northern Wei and Northern Qi periods, and the Daxingshan Temple in Chang'an during the Sui Dynasty.
These temples were distinguished from regular temples by their large Buddhist stupas, halls, and various Buddhist rituals, and were supported by the nation, with their costs borne by the government.
Similarly, Japan operated a system of “Daiji” (Great Temples), such as Baekje Daiji (Daegwan Daiji) and Yakushiji, where the national managed and financially supported the temples.
While the national temples in China and Japan shared Buddhist governance and ceremonial symbolism, they developed differently according to each nation's political context and city structures.
Chapter 3 focuses on the establishment and development of national temples in Baekje.
Baekje adopted Buddhism in 384 CE and constructed its first Buddhist temple in Hansan in 385 CE, marking an important symbolic architectural establishment for the capital.
King Seong established the Dae Tongsa Temple in the capital of Ungjin in 527 CE, marking the beginning of national temples with political significance.
The Dae Tongsa Temple was located at a key transportation hub near the Jeomincheon River, though early architectural remains are scarce, artifacts and roof tiles from the period were discovered.
In 538 CE, King Seong moved the capital to Sabi, where the city’s defenses and structure were planned, and many temples were built, including important national temples such as the Jeongnimsa and Gunsuri temple site.
Jeongnimsa was located in the heart of the Sabi capital and appears to have been constructed at a national level, while Gunsuri temple site had nation support but was of lower status compared to Jeongnimsa.
Mireuksaji, established in the mid-7th century by King Mu’s queen, was the largest temple with notable architectural features like the nine-story wooden pagoda and stone pagoda.
However, Mireuksaji was located in Iksan, not the capital of Sabi, and its construction may have continued after King Mu's death, making it difficult to classify as a national temple.
Additionally, the Dae Gwan Temple found at the Wanggungni site appears to have been established by Silla for managing Baekje’s territory, thus unrelated to Baekje's national temples.

Related Results

The Transformation of the Border Between Baekje and Silla in the Early~Middle 7th Century
The Transformation of the Border Between Baekje and Silla in the Early~Middle 7th Century
In this paper, the struggle of Baekje and Silla from the first half of the seventh century to the middle, and the corresponding trend of border transiton were reviewed. First, I ex...
A practical approach to King Mu and Princess Seonhwa of the Baekje kingdom
A practical approach to King Mu and Princess Seonhwa of the Baekje kingdom
In the Iksan area, archaeological ruins such as the royal palace, Mireuksa Temple, Jeseoksa Temple, Ssangneung Royal Tombs, and fortress walls, which are components of the ancient ...
Emerging and Evolution of Mahan Culture in the Iksan Regio
Emerging and Evolution of Mahan Culture in the Iksan Regio
It is generally believed that Mahan was founded before the 2nd century BC. According to historical records, Mahan began with King Jun's migration and settlement in the Iksan area. ...
Baekje's Expansion to Mahan(馬韓) and the Forces Around Woongcheon(熊川) in the Late 3rd and the Early 4th Century
Baekje's Expansion to Mahan(馬韓) and the Forces Around Woongcheon(熊川) in the Late 3rd and the Early 4th Century
According to 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』, Baekje(百濟) was expanded to the Woongcheon area in the 13th year of King Onjo, and installed the Woongcheon-Chaek(柵) in the 24th year of his reign. ...
Characteristics of Mahan Society in Iksan Viewed from Dwelling Site Data
Characteristics of Mahan Society in Iksan Viewed from Dwelling Site Data
The distribution of Mahan dwelling sites in the Iksan area is divided into the Geum River watershed area (Nonsancheon Stream and lower stream of Geum River) and the Mangyeong River...
The Development of Mahan Tombs in the Mangyeong River Basin
The Development of Mahan Tombs in the Mangyeong River Basin
Changes in the culture of Mahan tombs in the Mangyeonggang River basin can be divided into the period of prosperity of Jeokseok Wooden Tomb and the Tomb of the Tokwang (Mokgwan) To...
A on the Iconography of Standing Study Trikaya statue(Maaesamjonbul) in Taean Dongmun-ri
A on the Iconography of Standing Study Trikaya statue(Maaesamjonbul) in Taean Dongmun-ri
The relief of standing Trikaya statue(Maaesamjonbul) in Taean Dongmun-ri, located on 817-2 Dongmun-ri, Taean-eup, Taean-gun in Chungcheongnam-do, belongs to the early Baekje style ...

Back to Top