Javascript must be enabled to continue!
5. Rebirth: Eugenics and Marxism
View through CrossRef
The fifth chapter documents the active growth during the first two decades of the twentieth century of a British ‘national’ eugenics initiated by Francis Galton and the formation of a transnational eugenics movement that spread rapidly around the world, including to Russia. The infiltration of eugenics (in its Anglo-American ‘eugenics,’ French ‘eugénnétique,’ and German ‘Rassenhygiene’ versions) into Russian professional and popular discourse on human reproduction, heredity, development, and evolution became the major stimulus for the ‘resurrection’ of Florinskii’s long-forgotten work in the new, Soviet Russia that emerged out of the firestorms of World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, and the ensuing Civil War, which engulfed the former empire from 1914 through 1921. Mikhail Volotskoi, an anthropologist and a founding member of the Russian Eugenics Society established in Moscow in 1920, discovered, actively popularized, and in 1926 issued a new edition of Florinskii’s treatise. For Volotskoi, this tract was more than a historical curiosity. He found in Florinskii’s book a model and justification for what, in contrast to Galton’s ‘bourgeois’ eugenics, he saw as a ‘proletarian’ eugenics. Building on Florinskii’s ideas, he advanced a pointed ‘Marxist’ critique of Galtonian eugenics and its numerous followers in Russia and elsewhere. Volotskoi elaborated a concept of ‘bio-social’ eugenics and launched several research projects inspired by Florinskii’s notion of ‘conditions conducive’ to either perfection or degeneration, investigating the ‘eugenic’ effects of various factors, ranging from occupational hazards to women’s fashion. In contrast to the first publication of Florinskii’s book, the new edition did not go unnoticed.
Title: 5. Rebirth: Eugenics and Marxism
Description:
The fifth chapter documents the active growth during the first two decades of the twentieth century of a British ‘national’ eugenics initiated by Francis Galton and the formation of a transnational eugenics movement that spread rapidly around the world, including to Russia.
The infiltration of eugenics (in its Anglo-American ‘eugenics,’ French ‘eugénnétique,’ and German ‘Rassenhygiene’ versions) into Russian professional and popular discourse on human reproduction, heredity, development, and evolution became the major stimulus for the ‘resurrection’ of Florinskii’s long-forgotten work in the new, Soviet Russia that emerged out of the firestorms of World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution, and the ensuing Civil War, which engulfed the former empire from 1914 through 1921.
Mikhail Volotskoi, an anthropologist and a founding member of the Russian Eugenics Society established in Moscow in 1920, discovered, actively popularized, and in 1926 issued a new edition of Florinskii’s treatise.
For Volotskoi, this tract was more than a historical curiosity.
He found in Florinskii’s book a model and justification for what, in contrast to Galton’s ‘bourgeois’ eugenics, he saw as a ‘proletarian’ eugenics.
Building on Florinskii’s ideas, he advanced a pointed ‘Marxist’ critique of Galtonian eugenics and its numerous followers in Russia and elsewhere.
Volotskoi elaborated a concept of ‘bio-social’ eugenics and launched several research projects inspired by Florinskii’s notion of ‘conditions conducive’ to either perfection or degeneration, investigating the ‘eugenic’ effects of various factors, ranging from occupational hazards to women’s fashion.
In contrast to the first publication of Florinskii’s book, the new edition did not go unnoticed.
Related Results
8. Science of the Future: With and Without Galton
8. Science of the Future: With and Without Galton
The concluding chapter examines the implications of the peculiar history of eugenics in Russia, as seen through the biography of Florinskii’s treatise, for the understanding of the...
Eugenika – aspekty historyczne, biologiczne i edukacyjne
Eugenika – aspekty historyczne, biologiczne i edukacyjne
Eugenics is the selection of desired heritable characteristics in order to improve future generations, typically in reference to humans. The article is about eugenics in historical...
Internationalism, Cosmopolitanism, and Eugenics
Internationalism, Cosmopolitanism, and Eugenics
Abstract
The strong connection between eugenics and nationalism is now a clear interpretive strand in the historiography. This article discusses various studies of e...
Eugenics in Japan: Sanguinous Repair
Eugenics in Japan: Sanguinous Repair
Abstract
The article aims to discuss the relationships between eugenics, nationalism, and colonialism in Japan, and to highlight the ways in which eugenics was popul...
Eugenics and the Jews
Eugenics and the Jews
Abstract
This article discusses the role that eugenics plays in Jewish life, especially in shaping how Jews confronted the world, and engages Jewish and non-Jewish r...
Eugenics in Colonial Kenya
Eugenics in Colonial Kenya
Abstract
The application of eugenics to a new environment raises questions about the individuals who served as conduits for these ideas. This article discusses eugen...
The Reception and Criticism of Marxism in Russian Religious Philosophy (Late 19th – First Half of the 20th Century)
The Reception and Criticism of Marxism in Russian Religious Philosophy (Late 19th – First Half of the 20th Century)
At the end of the 19th century, Marxism was widely spread in Russia. Many Russian philosophers, including religious ones, among whom were N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, P. Struve, S. Fr...

