Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sondheim’s Genius
View through CrossRef
This chapter explores the balance and contradictions between Stephen Sondheim’s auteur status and the collaborative world of popular musical theater within which he has worked. Focusing onSweeney Todd, it argues that his liberal arts education has facilitated both intertextual collaboration with past authors and literary traditions (Dickens’s London, the filmHangover Square, and previousSweeney Toddauthors, including George Dibdin Pitt and possibly Austin Rosser) and the exercise of artistic control that is potentially demonic, like Todd’s monstrosity, but held in check by a “vaudeville” aesthetic. The number “God, that’s good!” is analyzed in detail to demonstrate the point.
Title: Sondheim’s Genius
Description:
This chapter explores the balance and contradictions between Stephen Sondheim’s auteur status and the collaborative world of popular musical theater within which he has worked.
Focusing onSweeney Todd, it argues that his liberal arts education has facilitated both intertextual collaboration with past authors and literary traditions (Dickens’s London, the filmHangover Square, and previousSweeney Toddauthors, including George Dibdin Pitt and possibly Austin Rosser) and the exercise of artistic control that is potentially demonic, like Todd’s monstrosity, but held in check by a “vaudeville” aesthetic.
The number “God, that’s good!” is analyzed in detail to demonstrate the point.
Related Results
Restoration of the Genius of Connecticut
Restoration of the Genius of Connecticut
Casimer Michalczyk, Conservation and restoration, 1973, C.S.C.P.R.C....