Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Dilemma of Decentralization in Public Policy Implementation in Indonesia
View through CrossRef
Decentralization has been a central agenda in Indonesia's governmental reform since the end of the New Order regime, marked by the enactment of Law No. 22 of 1999, which was later revised through Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. The primary goals of decentralization are to strengthen local democracy, enhance the effectiveness of public service delivery, and accelerate development based on local needs. However, its implementation has led to a range of complex dilemmas. This article aims to critically examine the dynamics and challenges of decentralization in the context of public policy implementation in Indonesia, with a particular focus on structural issues such as disparities in regional capacity, overlapping authorities between central and local governments, weak intergovernmental coordination, and the growing potential for misuse of autonomy by local actors. This study employs a qualitative approach using literature review and thematic analysis of regulations, academic literature, and relevant empirical studies. The main findings indicate that decentralization, when not supported by institutional readiness and adequate oversight, tends to produce policy fragmentation, widen interregional disparities, and create opportunities for corrupt practices at the local level. Therefore, a reformulation of decentralized approaches is urgently needed through the strengthening of asymmetric decentralization models, improvement of intergovernmental governance mechanisms, and the development of effective and adaptive accountability systems. Without a fundamental correction to the design and practice of decentralization, public policy in Indonesia will continue to face structural obstacles that undermine the quality of local governance and threaten national integration.
Indonesian Journal Publisher
Title: The Dilemma of Decentralization in Public Policy Implementation in Indonesia
Description:
Decentralization has been a central agenda in Indonesia's governmental reform since the end of the New Order regime, marked by the enactment of Law No.
22 of 1999, which was later revised through Law No.
23 of 2014 on Regional Government.
The primary goals of decentralization are to strengthen local democracy, enhance the effectiveness of public service delivery, and accelerate development based on local needs.
However, its implementation has led to a range of complex dilemmas.
This article aims to critically examine the dynamics and challenges of decentralization in the context of public policy implementation in Indonesia, with a particular focus on structural issues such as disparities in regional capacity, overlapping authorities between central and local governments, weak intergovernmental coordination, and the growing potential for misuse of autonomy by local actors.
This study employs a qualitative approach using literature review and thematic analysis of regulations, academic literature, and relevant empirical studies.
The main findings indicate that decentralization, when not supported by institutional readiness and adequate oversight, tends to produce policy fragmentation, widen interregional disparities, and create opportunities for corrupt practices at the local level.
Therefore, a reformulation of decentralized approaches is urgently needed through the strengthening of asymmetric decentralization models, improvement of intergovernmental governance mechanisms, and the development of effective and adaptive accountability systems.
Without a fundamental correction to the design and practice of decentralization, public policy in Indonesia will continue to face structural obstacles that undermine the quality of local governance and threaten national integration.
Related Results
Tax decentralization in Ukraine: problems and prospects
Tax decentralization in Ukraine: problems and prospects
The paper examines the essence of the concept of “tax (fiscal) decentralization” according to different views of domestic and foreign scholars. The theoretical concept of tax (fisc...
Fiscal Decentralization, Public Health Expenditure and Public Health–Evidence From China
Fiscal Decentralization, Public Health Expenditure and Public Health–Evidence From China
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak and the launch of the “Healthy China 2030” strategy in 2019, public health has become a relevant topic of discussion both within and ou...
ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DECENTRALIZATION OF ECONOMIC POWER INSTITUTIONS
ECONOMIC AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DECENTRALIZATION OF ECONOMIC POWER INSTITUTIONS
The article examines the impact of the decentralization of economic power institutions on the financial stability of territorial communities and the macroeconomic dynamics of Ukrai...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Asymmetric decentralisation arrangements in the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia
Asymmetric decentralisation arrangements in the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia
This research aims: 1) to find, review, and analyze the importance of asymmetrical decentralization in the implementation of regional autonomy; 2) to find, review, and analyze the ...
Fiscal powers of municipalities in Russia’s resource-rich regions and fixed capital investment
Fiscal powers of municipalities in Russia’s resource-rich regions and fixed capital investment
The article considers the nature and limits of the impact local fiscal decentralization exerts on private fixed capital investments in resource-rich Russia’s regions. The relevance...
Financial Decentralization, Government Attention to STI and SME Growth
Financial Decentralization, Government Attention to STI and SME Growth
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as the driving force of job creation and scientific and technological innovation in the new era, play a pivotal role in the growth and de...
TRAJECTORY OF INTERRELATION BETWEEN SPATIAL PLANNING AND DECENTRALIZATION IN SERBIA
TRAJECTORY OF INTERRELATION BETWEEN SPATIAL PLANNING AND DECENTRALIZATION IN SERBIA
The important academic issue could be recognized in investigating relations between decentralization, through the sub-municipal government, and the hierarchical structure of the se...

