Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Daniel

View through CrossRef
The book of Daniel contains a collection of short narratives about Daniel and his three friends at the courts of pagan kings (chapters 1–6), followed by a series of apocalyptic visions received by Daniel (chapters 7–12). In Christian canons the book is placed with the prophetic works, following Ezekiel, whereas in the Jewish canon Daniel is grouped with the writings, following the Megillot and preceding Ezra. The book of Daniel played a major role in the development of modern historical criticism, since historical critical methods cast doubt on the book’s claims that Daniel was a historical figure from the time of the Babylonian exile who saw visions of a distant future. Modern scholarship now judges that the book had a long process of development. Although oral traditions concerning Daniel may indeed go back to the end of the Neo-Babylonian Empire (mid-6th century bce), the story collection appears to have taken shape during the Persian period and to have reached its final form in the early Hellenistic era (3rd century bce). The apocalypses, however, can be closely dated to the time of the Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV Epiphanes (168–164 bce). Additional literature about Daniel was also produced. Some of these compositions (Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, and Additions to Daniel 3) are considered canonical by the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions. Other noncanonical Danielic compositions have been discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The book was widely influential both in early Judaism and in Christianity.
Oxford University Press
Title: Daniel
Description:
The book of Daniel contains a collection of short narratives about Daniel and his three friends at the courts of pagan kings (chapters 1–6), followed by a series of apocalyptic visions received by Daniel (chapters 7–12).
In Christian canons the book is placed with the prophetic works, following Ezekiel, whereas in the Jewish canon Daniel is grouped with the writings, following the Megillot and preceding Ezra.
The book of Daniel played a major role in the development of modern historical criticism, since historical critical methods cast doubt on the book’s claims that Daniel was a historical figure from the time of the Babylonian exile who saw visions of a distant future.
Modern scholarship now judges that the book had a long process of development.
Although oral traditions concerning Daniel may indeed go back to the end of the Neo-Babylonian Empire (mid-6th century bce), the story collection appears to have taken shape during the Persian period and to have reached its final form in the early Hellenistic era (3rd century bce).
The apocalypses, however, can be closely dated to the time of the Maccabean revolt against Antiochus IV Epiphanes (168–164 bce).
Additional literature about Daniel was also produced.
Some of these compositions (Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, and Additions to Daniel 3) are considered canonical by the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions.
Other noncanonical Danielic compositions have been discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The book was widely influential both in early Judaism and in Christianity.

Related Results

Humanities
Humanities
James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar, Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education, reviewed by glen a. jones Daniel Coleman and S...
Maps of a Nation? The Digitized Ordnance Survey for New Historical Research
Maps of a Nation? The Digitized Ordnance Survey for New Historical Research
Abstract Although the Ordnance Survey has itself been the subject of historical research, scholars have not systematically used its maps as primary sources of inform...
Commentaries and Rejoinder on
Commentaries and Rejoinder on
While direct replications such as the “Many Labs” project are extremely valuable in testing the reliability of published findings across laboratories, they reflect the common relia...
Writing/performing myself on-screen: Daniel Monks’ memory work on film
Writing/performing myself on-screen: Daniel Monks’ memory work on film
Performing memories is a way of working through and reconstructing the self. Films that draw on autobiographical experiences are a way of working through and constructing narrative...
Bach eXperience: una aproximación creativa a la simetría cuatro π a través de Bach y la alfabetidad visual
Bach eXperience: una aproximación creativa a la simetría cuatro π a través de Bach y la alfabetidad visual
Este artículo presenta una experiencia educativa de docencia universitaria a través de la cultura visual, la música, la ciencia, la tecnología y las matemáticas en el plan de forma...
Dyadic Analysis of Fragile Middle Eastern States and Humanitarian Implications of Restrictive covid-19 Policies
Dyadic Analysis of Fragile Middle Eastern States and Humanitarian Implications of Restrictive covid-19 Policies
Abstract The covid-19 pandemic has pressured governments to respond with restrictive and health resource-oriented policies to contain the spread of the virus. The aim of this paper...
Conclusion
Conclusion
“Sanctuary is not the building. Sanctuary is the people of the church. The brothers and sisters,” cried out Daniel Oliver-Perez during a vigil for his father, Samuel, who was detai...
TUGAS FILSAFAT PANCASILA DANIEL
TUGAS FILSAFAT PANCASILA DANIEL
Indonesia merupakan negara multikultural karena negara ini memiliki keragaman suku bangsa dan agama. Keragaman suku bangsa merupakan sekumpulan manusia yang memiliki suatu kesatuan...

Back to Top