Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative morbidity between in situ and extra-abdominal Uterine repair at Cesarean delivery

View through CrossRef
In-situ and extra abdominal repair of uterine wound during cesarean section are two valid approaches. This study was carried out to compare intra operative and post operative morbidity in women undergoing caesarean delivery using these two techniques. This is a prospective interventional randomized controlled study. The study subjects include 170 women undergoing Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at Southern Railway HQ hospital, Chennai. Intra operative and post operative parameters were analysed in all the study subjects. In in-situ group, 12.6 % women experienced intra operative pain and 30.1% women in extra abdominal group. Intra operative nausea and vomiting was seen in 16.1% women in in-situ group and 28.9% women in extra abdominal group. 1.1% women in in-situ had post-operative febrile morbidity and 8.4 % had in extra abdominal group. The median fall in haemoglobin was 1.30 g/dL and 1.40 g/dL in in-situ and extra abdominal group respectively. In-situ repair of the uterine wound at cesarean delivery is associated with lesser incidence of intra operative pain , intra operative nausea or vomiting and post operative febrile morbidity compared to extra abdominal repair technique.
Title: Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative morbidity between in situ and extra-abdominal Uterine repair at Cesarean delivery
Description:
In-situ and extra abdominal repair of uterine wound during cesarean section are two valid approaches.
This study was carried out to compare intra operative and post operative morbidity in women undergoing caesarean delivery using these two techniques.
This is a prospective interventional randomized controlled study.
The study subjects include 170 women undergoing Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at Southern Railway HQ hospital, Chennai.
Intra operative and post operative parameters were analysed in all the study subjects.
In in-situ group, 12.
6 % women experienced intra operative pain and 30.
1% women in extra abdominal group.
Intra operative nausea and vomiting was seen in 16.
1% women in in-situ group and 28.
9% women in extra abdominal group.
1.
1% women in in-situ had post-operative febrile morbidity and 8.
4 % had in extra abdominal group.
The median fall in haemoglobin was 1.
30 g/dL and 1.
40 g/dL in in-situ and extra abdominal group respectively.
In-situ repair of the uterine wound at cesarean delivery is associated with lesser incidence of intra operative pain , intra operative nausea or vomiting and post operative febrile morbidity compared to extra abdominal repair technique.

Related Results

Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The succes...
EFFECT OF UTERINE FIBROID ON MODE OF DELIVERY
EFFECT OF UTERINE FIBROID ON MODE OF DELIVERY
Introduction: Uterine fibroids are the commonest benign tumors occurring in the female reproductive tract. They occur in 30%–70% of women in their Reproductive age. The fibroids in...
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...

Back to Top