Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ancient Greek Tragedy Speaks to Democracy Theory
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This essay initially distinguishes Athenian democracy from what I call ‘hyphenated-democracies’, each of which adds a conceptual framework developed in early modern Europe to the language of democracy: representative-democracy, liberal-democracy, constitutional-democracy, republican-democracy. These hyphenated-democracies emphasize the restraints placed on the power of political authorities. In contrast, Athenian democracy with the people ruling over themselves rested on the fundamental principle of equality rather than the limitations placed on that rule. However, equality as the defining normative principle of democracy raises its own problems, namely: How do we – of limited vision – identify who is equal, and what injustices attend the criteria used to establish who is equal? Consideration of several ancient tragedies illustrates how the Athenian playwrights explored these questions and how they identified the challenges faced by those who understand democracy as grounded on egalitarian principles.
Title: Ancient Greek Tragedy Speaks to Democracy Theory
Description:
Abstract
This essay initially distinguishes Athenian democracy from what I call ‘hyphenated-democracies’, each of which adds a conceptual framework developed in early modern Europe to the language of democracy: representative-democracy, liberal-democracy, constitutional-democracy, republican-democracy.
These hyphenated-democracies emphasize the restraints placed on the power of political authorities.
In contrast, Athenian democracy with the people ruling over themselves rested on the fundamental principle of equality rather than the limitations placed on that rule.
However, equality as the defining normative principle of democracy raises its own problems, namely: How do we – of limited vision – identify who is equal, and what injustices attend the criteria used to establish who is equal? Consideration of several ancient tragedies illustrates how the Athenian playwrights explored these questions and how they identified the challenges faced by those who understand democracy as grounded on egalitarian principles.
Related Results
David Hart, The Beauty of the Infinite: A Response
David Hart, The Beauty of the Infinite: A Response
I dissent from Hart's project of a theological aesthetics by a hair's breadth: but that hair's breadth is tragedy. The Beauty of the Infinite is an excellent book, but it would be ...
Greek Tragedy and Modernist Performance
Greek Tragedy and Modernist Performance
This book explores how encounters between modernist theatre makers and Greek tragedy were constitutive in modernist experiments in performance. It analyses the experiments of Isado...
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Democracy as a system has become an alternative in various social and state activities in several countries. The reason for making democracy a social and state system is because al...
Convergence of Islam and Democracy
Convergence of Islam and Democracy
This studyattempts to analysethe relationship between Islam and democracy objectively with logical rational arguments. It aims to clarify the differences between Islam and democrac...
Self-Limitation and Democracy Lefort’s Model of Council Democracy
Self-Limitation and Democracy Lefort’s Model of Council Democracy
This chapter explores the theory of council democracy developed by the French political thinker Claude Lefort. Like his onetime compatriot in Socialisme ou Barberie, Cornelius Cast...
Pandangan M. Natsir Tentang Demokrasi: Kajian Pemikiran Politik Islam
Pandangan M. Natsir Tentang Demokrasi: Kajian Pemikiran Politik Islam
This article discusses M. Natsir view on the concept of democracy in Islam. In the map of Islamic political thought, there are differing views on the concept of democracy from the ...
The Idea of Democracy in the Modern Era
The Idea of Democracy in the Modern Era
Although the last half of the twentieth century has been called the Age of Democracy, the twenty-first has already demonstrated the fragility of its apparent triumph as the dominan...
Internal Democracy in Pakistani Religious Parties: A Comparative Analysis of Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami
Internal Democracy in Pakistani Religious Parties: A Comparative Analysis of Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami
Democratization is an important phenomenon in the contemporary world. An important feature of modern representative democracy is the emergence of political parties, as these are re...


