Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundAdvancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and policy development have enabled more people to have biologically related children in Canada. However, as ART continues to focus on infertility and low fertility of heterosexual couples, ART access and research has been uneven towards meeting the reproductive needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirit, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQ2SIA +) people. Furthermore, experiences of reproduction are impacted by intersectional lived realities of race, gender, sexuality, and class. This commentary utilizes a reproductive justice (RJ) framework to consider reproductive access for LGBTQ2SIA + Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC), while simultaneously engaging through a critical lens RJ has on ART. An RJ framework considers the constitutive elements of reproductive capacity and decision making that are not often at the forefront of reproductive health discussions. Additionally, this commentary discusses reproductive rights violations and reproductive violence such as coerced and forced sterilizations that have and are currently occurring in Canada. This article considers systems of access and structures of regulation that seek to control the reproductive capacities of marginalized communities, while empowering accessibility and upholding white supremacy and heteronormativity. In thinking through research and access in ART, who are ART users and whose reproduction is centered in research and access in Canada?ConclusionA reproductive justice framework is urgently needed to address inequities of sexual and reproductive health access in Canada.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies
Description:
AbstractBackgroundAdvancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and policy development have enabled more people to have biologically related children in Canada.
However, as ART continues to focus on infertility and low fertility of heterosexual couples, ART access and research has been uneven towards meeting the reproductive needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirit, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQ2SIA +) people.
Furthermore, experiences of reproduction are impacted by intersectional lived realities of race, gender, sexuality, and class.
This commentary utilizes a reproductive justice (RJ) framework to consider reproductive access for LGBTQ2SIA + Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC), while simultaneously engaging through a critical lens RJ has on ART.
An RJ framework considers the constitutive elements of reproductive capacity and decision making that are not often at the forefront of reproductive health discussions.
Additionally, this commentary discusses reproductive rights violations and reproductive violence such as coerced and forced sterilizations that have and are currently occurring in Canada.
This article considers systems of access and structures of regulation that seek to control the reproductive capacities of marginalized communities, while empowering accessibility and upholding white supremacy and heteronormativity.
In thinking through research and access in ART, who are ART users and whose reproduction is centered in research and access in Canada?ConclusionA reproductive justice framework is urgently needed to address inequities of sexual and reproductive health access in Canada.

Related Results

Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
Lists, Spatial Practice and Assistive Technologies for the Blind
Lists, Spatial Practice and Assistive Technologies for the Blind
IntroductionSupermarkets are functionally challenging environments for people with vision impairments. A supermarket is likely to house an average of 45,000 products in a median fl...
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Ethics of climate change : a normative account
Consider, for instance, you and your family have lived around a place where you enjoyed the flora and fauna of the land as well as the natural environment. Fishing and farming were...
Cooperating as Peers : Labor Justice between Distributive and Relational Equality
Cooperating as Peers : Labor Justice between Distributive and Relational Equality
Coopérer en tant que pairs : justice du travail entre égalité distributive et relationnelle Le travail est sous-représenté dans les débats sur la justice sociale. L...
Justice paysanne
Justice paysanne
En anthropologie juridique, le terme « justice paysanne » renvoie à l’une des expressions du pluralisme juridique, entendu comme l’existence d’une pluralité d’ordres normatifs, de ...
Restorative Justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice
Restorative Justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice
Restorative justice is an innovative justice response to crime and offending that takes many forms such as victim-offender meetings, family group conferencing and youth justice con...
Queering the Courts
Queering the Courts
<p><strong>Takatāpui/LGBTQ+/queer people can face increased victimisation (Ministry of Justice, 2022b) and criminalisation (Mogul, Ritchie, & Whitlock, 2011), altho...

Back to Top