Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The precise calculations of the constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and photons of general relativity

View through CrossRef
In general relativity, the values of constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and light have not been seriously discussed. Based on the Schwarzschild metric and the geodesic equations of the Riemann geometry, it is proved in this paper that the constant term in the time-dependent equation of motion of planet in general relativity must be equal to zero. Otherwise, when the correction term of general relativity is ignored, the resulting Newtonian gravity formula would change its basic form. Due to the absence of this constant term, the equation of motion cannot describe the elliptical and the hyperbolic orbital motions of celestial bodies in the solar gravitational field. It can only describe the parabolic orbital motion (with minor corrections). Therefore, it becomes meaningless to use general relativity calculating the precession of Mercury's perihelion. It is also proved that the time-dependent orbital equation of light in general relativity is contradictory to the time-independent equation of light. Using the time-independent orbital equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light in the solar gravitational field is <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . But using the time-dependent equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light is only a small correction of the prediction value <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the Newtonian gravity theory with a magnitude order of <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The reason causing this inconsistency was the Einstein's assumption that the motion of light satisfied the condition <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in gravitational field. It leads to the absence of constant term in the time-independent equation of motion of light and destroys the uniqueness of geodesic in curved space-time. Meanwhile, light is subjected to repulsive forces in the gravitational field, rather than attractive forces. The direction of deflection of light is opposite, inconsistent with the predictions of present general relativity and the Newtonian theory of gravity. Observing on the earth surface, the wavelength of light emitted by the sun is violet shifted. This prediction is obviously not true. Practical observation is red shift. Finally, the practical significance of the calculation of the Mercury perihelion's precession and the existing problems of the light's deflection experiments of general relativity are briefly discussed. The conclusion of this paper is that general relativity cannot have consistence with the Newtonian theory of gravity for the descriptions of motions of planets and light in the solar system. The theory itself is not self-consistent too.
Physics Essays Publication
Title: The precise calculations of the constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and photons of general relativity
Description:
In general relativity, the values of constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and light have not been seriously discussed.
Based on the Schwarzschild metric and the geodesic equations of the Riemann geometry, it is proved in this paper that the constant term in the time-dependent equation of motion of planet in general relativity must be equal to zero.
Otherwise, when the correction term of general relativity is ignored, the resulting Newtonian gravity formula would change its basic form.
Due to the absence of this constant term, the equation of motion cannot describe the elliptical and the hyperbolic orbital motions of celestial bodies in the solar gravitational field.
It can only describe the parabolic orbital motion (with minor corrections).
Therefore, it becomes meaningless to use general relativity calculating the precession of Mercury's perihelion.
It is also proved that the time-dependent orbital equation of light in general relativity is contradictory to the time-independent equation of light.
Using the time-independent orbital equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light in the solar gravitational field is <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.
7</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .
But using the time-dependent equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light is only a small correction of the prediction value <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.
87</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the Newtonian gravity theory with a magnitude order of <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> .
The reason causing this inconsistency was the Einstein's assumption that the motion of light satisfied the condition <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in gravitational field.
It leads to the absence of constant term in the time-independent equation of motion of light and destroys the uniqueness of geodesic in curved space-time.
Meanwhile, light is subjected to repulsive forces in the gravitational field, rather than attractive forces.
The direction of deflection of light is opposite, inconsistent with the predictions of present general relativity and the Newtonian theory of gravity.
Observing on the earth surface, the wavelength of light emitted by the sun is violet shifted.
This prediction is obviously not true.
Practical observation is red shift.
Finally, the practical significance of the calculation of the Mercury perihelion's precession and the existing problems of the light's deflection experiments of general relativity are briefly discussed.
The conclusion of this paper is that general relativity cannot have consistence with the Newtonian theory of gravity for the descriptions of motions of planets and light in the solar system.
The theory itself is not self-consistent too.

Related Results

Interior dynamics of small-core and coreless exoplanets
Interior dynamics of small-core and coreless exoplanets
Since the first exoplanet detection in 1992, the study of exoplanets has received considerable attention. It is becoming apparent that the diversity of the general exoplanet popula...
Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS Special relativity has been successfully used to describe the behaviour of particles (Rossi &amp; Hall, 1941), but there is no observation of special relativity in ...
Dynamics of giant planets in protoplanetary discs
Dynamics of giant planets in protoplanetary discs
New instruments such as the ALMA interferometer and SPHERE on VLT allowed to obtain a large number of high-resolution images of protoplanetary discs. In these images, substructures...
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
Abstract In this paper, the special theory of relativity in different media is established, based on the fundamental invariant of the space-time four-dimensional space x2 +...
Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS This paper is presenting an experiment based on Ehrenfest's paradox where an effect of special relativity was expected but not observed. The validity of special relativi...
Relativity and View Effects
Relativity and View Effects
Abstract This paper describes a new interpretation of relativity. The concept of rest frames of the observer and the object clarifies the initial assumptions used in Genera...
Relativity and View Effects
Relativity and View Effects
Abstract This paper describes a new interpretation of relativity.The concept of rest frames of the observer and the object clarifies the initial assumptions used in General...
Improving tidal modeling for rocky worlds
Improving tidal modeling for rocky worlds
&lt;p&gt;The high number of discovered close-in planets motivates the improvement of tidal modeling.Among the five thousand exoplanets discovered up to now, half of them ha...

Back to Top