Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Less Invasive Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella May Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Fulminant Myocarditis
View through CrossRef
Fulminant myocarditis (FM) requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) has a high mortality rate. Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are sometimes insufficient to induce cardiac recovery. For patients with FM refractory to VA-ECMO with IABP, we have applied a biventricular assist device (BIVAD) or Impella to unload the left ventricle and to fully support the systemic circulation. In the last 10 years, 37 refractory FM patients histologically diagnosed with myocarditis and who did not recover with VA-ECMO were treated with BIVAD (n = 19) or Impella (n = 18). No significant difference was found between the Impella and BIVAD groups in preoperative findings other than serum creatinine level. Seventeen of 18 patients in the Impella group were successfully weaned from t-MCS in 9 (6–12) days. Conversely, the temporary BIVAD was removed in 21 (11–38) days in 10 of 19 patients. Six patients died while on temporary BIVAD because of multiple organ failure and cerebral bleeding, and three patients required conversion to implantable VAD. Compared with BIVAD, left ventricular unloading with Impella could be less invasive and could promote cardiac recovery in refractory FM patients. The Impella has the potential to provide effective temporary MCS for FM patients.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Less Invasive Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella May Improve the Clinical Outcomes of Fulminant Myocarditis
Description:
Fulminant myocarditis (FM) requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) has a high mortality rate.
Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are sometimes insufficient to induce cardiac recovery.
For patients with FM refractory to VA-ECMO with IABP, we have applied a biventricular assist device (BIVAD) or Impella to unload the left ventricle and to fully support the systemic circulation.
In the last 10 years, 37 refractory FM patients histologically diagnosed with myocarditis and who did not recover with VA-ECMO were treated with BIVAD (n = 19) or Impella (n = 18).
No significant difference was found between the Impella and BIVAD groups in preoperative findings other than serum creatinine level.
Seventeen of 18 patients in the Impella group were successfully weaned from t-MCS in 9 (6–12) days.
Conversely, the temporary BIVAD was removed in 21 (11–38) days in 10 of 19 patients.
Six patients died while on temporary BIVAD because of multiple organ failure and cerebral bleeding, and three patients required conversion to implantable VAD.
Compared with BIVAD, left ventricular unloading with Impella could be less invasive and could promote cardiac recovery in refractory FM patients.
The Impella has the potential to provide effective temporary MCS for FM patients.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Background: The Impella® device is a type of antegrade left ventricular assist device that includes a pump catheter designed to reside in the mid-left ventricular cavity. It has re...
Fulminant eosinophilic myocarditis treated with steroids and mechanical unloading: a case report
Fulminant eosinophilic myocarditis treated with steroids and mechanical unloading: a case report
Abstract
Background
Eosinophilic myocarditis is a rare form of myocardial inflammatory disease. Eosinophilic infiltration of the...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of th...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
Abstract
Impella® pumps are increasingly utilized in patients in cardiogenic shock. We report on a case series where Impella support was insufficient, and a switch t...

