Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ecosystem functions of ants and dung beetles in agriculture‐dominated Amazonian riparian forests
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Land‐use changes and habitat fragmentation can alter biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions.
We investigated whether cropland expansion in south‐east Amazonia decreases ecosystem functions performed by ants and dung beetles by altering their communities.
We sampled both groups in two forest types, in south‐eastern Amazonia: undisturbed riparian forests and riparian forests surrounded by croplands. We sampled ants and dung beetles with epigaeic pitfall traps, and experimentally assessed seed removal and predation by ants, and faeces and seed removal by dung beetles.
Although ant and dung beetle abundance and richness did not differ across riparian forests, species composition of both groups did. Ants found seeds faster in undisturbed riparian forests, but the proportion of seed removal did not differ between forests. The abundance of predatory ants and the predation of termites by ants did not differ between forests.
Seed and dung removal by dung beetles did not differ across riparian forests. Despite the observed differences in dung beetle composition, we did not find the effects on ecosystem functions probably due a functional redundancy of species.
The quality of ecosystem functions provided by ants is lower in riparian forests surrounded by croplands, while changes in dung beetle diversity did not impact their ecosystem functions, with potential effects on the natural recovery of these disturbed riparian forests.
Title: Ecosystem functions of ants and dung beetles in agriculture‐dominated Amazonian riparian forests
Description:
Abstract
Land‐use changes and habitat fragmentation can alter biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions.
We investigated whether cropland expansion in south‐east Amazonia decreases ecosystem functions performed by ants and dung beetles by altering their communities.
We sampled both groups in two forest types, in south‐eastern Amazonia: undisturbed riparian forests and riparian forests surrounded by croplands.
We sampled ants and dung beetles with epigaeic pitfall traps, and experimentally assessed seed removal and predation by ants, and faeces and seed removal by dung beetles.
Although ant and dung beetle abundance and richness did not differ across riparian forests, species composition of both groups did.
Ants found seeds faster in undisturbed riparian forests, but the proportion of seed removal did not differ between forests.
The abundance of predatory ants and the predation of termites by ants did not differ between forests.
Seed and dung removal by dung beetles did not differ across riparian forests.
Despite the observed differences in dung beetle composition, we did not find the effects on ecosystem functions probably due a functional redundancy of species.
The quality of ecosystem functions provided by ants is lower in riparian forests surrounded by croplands, while changes in dung beetle diversity did not impact their ecosystem functions, with potential effects on the natural recovery of these disturbed riparian forests.
Related Results
Territorial Defense: Aggressive Behavior in Beetles
Territorial Defense: Aggressive Behavior in Beetles
Territoriality, referring to the defense of a designated area, is one of the common animal behaviors observed in many insect species. In insects, territorial behavior contributes t...
Integration of spatial and temporal patterns for ecological environment management in river-riparian system
Integration of spatial and temporal patterns for ecological environment management in river-riparian system
(English) Rivers are important carriers of water resources and important components of ecosystems. In some areas, rivers have been artificially narrowed, riparian areas have been e...
Can cows and fish co-exist?
Can cows and fish co-exist?
Our paper provides an ecological perspective on the interrelationship between livestock grazing and riparian areas through a review of topical literature. We also describe the Albe...
Dung beetles prefer used land over natural greenspace in urban landscape
Dung beetles prefer used land over natural greenspace in urban landscape
AbstractUrbanization drives land-use and patterns of biodiversity. Yet, very little is known about how biodiversity of structurally different habitats is responded to urbanization....
Dung burial by native and introduced dung beetles (Scarabaeidae)
Dung burial by native and introduced dung beetles (Scarabaeidae)
The quantity of dung buried and shredded by dung beetles at four sites in south-eastern Australia was found to be positively correlated with the dry weight (biomass) of beetles in ...
Avermectin residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) colonization and dung burial
Avermectin residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) colonization and dung burial
AbstractData from dung-baited pitfall traps show that dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) do not discriminate against dung from sheep or cattle treated with avermectin. On the ...
Urban tropical forest islets as hotspots of ants in general and invasive ants in particular
Urban tropical forest islets as hotspots of ants in general and invasive ants in particular
AbstractUrbanization is a crucial driver of environmental and biodiversity change. It is suggested that urbanization favours generalist and invasive species and might harm speciali...
Mixing the Message: Do Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Affect Dung-Generated Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
Mixing the Message: Do Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Affect Dung-Generated Greenhouse Gas Emissions?
AbstractBy mixing and potentially aerating dung, dung beetles may affect the microbes producing the greenhouse gases (GHGs): carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide ...

