Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The asynergies of disaster risk reduction measures in Afghanistan

View through CrossRef
<p>Many countries face the risk of multiple hazards. The UNDRR’s Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction have called upon the science community for an increased understanding of the complexities of multi-hazard risk (UNDRR 2019). Nonetheless, in the currently prevailing risk assessment paradigm, risk is often represented as static and fragmented in terms of hazard types. While positively influencing the risk of one hazard, DRR measures can have adverse effects on the risk of another hazard type thereby increasing the vulnerability of the built environment, exacerbating impacts and potentially causing compound or cascading disasters. For example, wood-frame buildings tend to perform well under ground shaking but are likely to sustain higher damages due to an inundation than concrete buildings. We refer to these negative impacts between hazards as the asynergy of a DRR measure. Due to the predominantly single-hazard approach, the potential asynergies of DRR measures remain poorly understood.</p><p>In a case study of Afghanistan, we calculate the asynergies of building level DRR measures for floods and earthquakes. To this extent, we develop two increased-resilience scenarios where a decrease in flood and earthquake vulnerability are mimicked. These scenarios are used to assess the asynergies and to illustrate to what degree a risk reduction of one risk may actually be offset by an increase of the other risk. This can then be used to show which type of measure is worthwhile in which area.</p><p>An improved capability of understanding risk more holistically would strongly benefit first responders, aid organizations, urban planners and decision makers in designing sustainable DRR measures. We discuss several key potential asynergies of building level DRR measures for floods and earthquakes tailored to decrease the risk of one hazard on the risk of the other hazard. Finally, we outline a roadmap highlighting key future research and policy directions, and possible ways to strengthen coherent policies for DRR.</p>
Title: The asynergies of disaster risk reduction measures in Afghanistan
Description:
<p>Many countries face the risk of multiple hazards.
The UNDRR’s Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction have called upon the science community for an increased understanding of the complexities of multi-hazard risk (UNDRR 2019).
Nonetheless, in the currently prevailing risk assessment paradigm, risk is often represented as static and fragmented in terms of hazard types.
While positively influencing the risk of one hazard, DRR measures can have adverse effects on the risk of another hazard type thereby increasing the vulnerability of the built environment, exacerbating impacts and potentially causing compound or cascading disasters.
For example, wood-frame buildings tend to perform well under ground shaking but are likely to sustain higher damages due to an inundation than concrete buildings.
We refer to these negative impacts between hazards as the asynergy of a DRR measure.
Due to the predominantly single-hazard approach, the potential asynergies of DRR measures remain poorly understood.
</p><p>In a case study of Afghanistan, we calculate the asynergies of building level DRR measures for floods and earthquakes.
To this extent, we develop two increased-resilience scenarios where a decrease in flood and earthquake vulnerability are mimicked.
These scenarios are used to assess the asynergies and to illustrate to what degree a risk reduction of one risk may actually be offset by an increase of the other risk.
This can then be used to show which type of measure is worthwhile in which area.
</p><p>An improved capability of understanding risk more holistically would strongly benefit first responders, aid organizations, urban planners and decision makers in designing sustainable DRR measures.
We discuss several key potential asynergies of building level DRR measures for floods and earthquakes tailored to decrease the risk of one hazard on the risk of the other hazard.
Finally, we outline a roadmap highlighting key future research and policy directions, and possible ways to strengthen coherent policies for DRR.
</p>.

Related Results

Development of a support system for creating disaster prevention maps focusing on road networks and hazardous elements
Development of a support system for creating disaster prevention maps focusing on road networks and hazardous elements
AbstractAs a disaster prevention measure based on self-assistance and mutual assistance, disaster prevention maps are being created with citizen participation throughout Japan. The...
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model
Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) research involves the infection of otherwise healthy participants with disease often for the sake of vaccine development. The COVID-19 pande...
Review of Risk Assessment Instruments for Juvenile Sex Offenders
Review of Risk Assessment Instruments for Juvenile Sex Offenders
Risk assessment is considered to be a key element in the prevention of recidivism among juvenile sex offenders (JSOs), often by imposing long-term consequences based on that assess...
The imagination of eco-disaster: Post-disaster rebuilding in Asian cinema
The imagination of eco-disaster: Post-disaster rebuilding in Asian cinema
Commercial films today often reduce representations of natural catastrophes to commodified spectacles that de-contextualize the subject matter. To contemporary film viewers, the ‘p...
Sustainability and bank risk
Sustainability and bank risk
Abstract Banks play a key role in society and are crucial for economic development. The existing literature finds a positive association between bank performance and ...
The Experience of Poverty Reduction in Rural China
The Experience of Poverty Reduction in Rural China
Since 1978, China has greatly reduced the rural poverty rate. This article provides an overview of the experience of China’s poverty reduction. Using panel data from 1996 to 2013 t...
Comparison of modelled seismic loss against historical damage information
Comparison of modelled seismic loss against historical damage information
<p>The increasing loss of human life and property due to earthquakes in past years have increased the demand for seismic risk analysis for people to be better prepare...
Multi-criteria Decision Making based on EDAS Approach for Business Risk Assessment in Electricity Retail Companies
Multi-criteria Decision Making based on EDAS Approach for Business Risk Assessment in Electricity Retail Companies
This paper introduce a multi- criteria decision making (MCDM) perfect to assess business risk in electricity retail company to decrease risk loss and mange risks of business. The e...

Back to Top