Ventricular tachycardia ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation outcomes for drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia (VT) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are suboptimal when compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy. We aimed to analyse the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous catheter ablation in this subset of patients. Methods Single-center observational retrospective registry including consecutive NICM patients who underwent catheter ablation for drug-resistant VT during a 10-year period. The efficacy endpoint was defined as VT-free survival after catheter ablation, while safety outcomes were defined by 30-days mortality and procedure-related complications. Independent predictors of VT recurrence were assessed by Cox regression. Results In a population of 68 patients, most were male (85%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 34±12%, and mean age was 58±15 years. All patients had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Twenty-six (38%) patients underwent epicardial ablation (table 1). Over a median follow-up of 3 years (IQR 1–8), 41% (n=31) patients had VT recurrence and 28% died (n=19). Multivariate survival analysis identified LVEF (HR= 0.98; 95% CI 0.92–0.99, p=0.046) and VT storm at presentation (HR=2.38; 95% CI 1.04–5.46, p=0.041) as independent predictors of VT recurrence. The yearly rates of VT recurrence and overall mortality were 21%/year and 10%/year, respectively. No patients died at 30-days post-procedure, and mean hospital length of stay was 5±6 days. The complication rate was 7% (n=5, table 1), mostly in patients undergoing epicardial ablation (4 vs 1 in endocardial ablation, P=0.046). Conclusion LVEF and VT storm at presentation were independent predictors of VT recurrence in NICM patients after catheter ablation. While clinical outcomes can be improved with further technical and scientific development, a tailored endocardial/epicardial approach was safe, with low overall number of complications and no 30-days mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.