Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Discussion of Aristotelianism and Machiavellianism in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as a Children’s Dystopic Novel

View through CrossRef
The present article analyses the representation of the political regimes in William Golding’s children’s dystopic novel, Lord of the Flies. Therefore, it, first of all, underlines the dystopian nature of the novel along with the features of plot, setting, characters and content to facilitate the reader to grasp the warning against totalitarianism throughout the novel. The study finds Aristotelian and Machiavellian philosophies of politics as highly convenient approaches to examine the political endeavours of the boys in the novel. As the key intention is to interrogate to what extent they fail or succeed in following the Aristotelianism and Machiavellianism, the paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of two separate philosophies to reveal their weaknesses and strengths in controlling people. The article then affirms that the order, set up through Aristotelianism, necessitates the repression of the evil, which is considerably tough for a ruler while the evil empowers Machiavellian totalitarians who turn citizens’ lives into a nightmare.
Transnational Press London
Title: A Discussion of Aristotelianism and Machiavellianism in William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” as a Children’s Dystopic Novel
Description:
The present article analyses the representation of the political regimes in William Golding’s children’s dystopic novel, Lord of the Flies.
Therefore, it, first of all, underlines the dystopian nature of the novel along with the features of plot, setting, characters and content to facilitate the reader to grasp the warning against totalitarianism throughout the novel.
The study finds Aristotelian and Machiavellian philosophies of politics as highly convenient approaches to examine the political endeavours of the boys in the novel.
As the key intention is to interrogate to what extent they fail or succeed in following the Aristotelianism and Machiavellianism, the paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of two separate philosophies to reveal their weaknesses and strengths in controlling people.
The article then affirms that the order, set up through Aristotelianism, necessitates the repression of the evil, which is considerably tough for a ruler while the evil empowers Machiavellian totalitarians who turn citizens’ lives into a nightmare.

Related Results

CHEMOTACTOMETER AND GLUE TRAP BIOASSAYS TO EVALUATE PELLET BAITS TO LURE HOUSE FLIES
CHEMOTACTOMETER AND GLUE TRAP BIOASSAYS TO EVALUATE PELLET BAITS TO LURE HOUSE FLIES
Different pellet baits were prepared and evaluated for their efficacy to lure house flies in chemotactometer and glue trap bioassays. Pellets with fish meal alone (FM), fish meal +...
Debunking the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Debunking the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Research on the exploitative and manipulative personality trait Machiavellianism often entertains an empathic deficit hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, aversive tendencies ...
Challenging the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Challenging the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Research on the exploitative and manipulative personality trait Machiavellianism often entertains an empathic deficit hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, aversive tendencies ...
Challenging the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Challenging the “Empathic Deficits Hypothesis” of Machiavellianism: Lack of motivation rather than lack of ability
Research on the exploitative and manipulative personality trait Machiavellianism often entertains an empathic deficit hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, aversive tendencies ...
Self-Efficacy, Need for Achievement and Machiavellianism in Public Sector Employees
Self-Efficacy, Need for Achievement and Machiavellianism in Public Sector Employees
The present study was conducted to examine the relationship between self-efficacy, need for achievement and Machiavellianism in public sector employees. It was hypothesized that th...
Self-Efficacy, Need for Achievement and Machiavellianism in Public Sector Employees
Self-Efficacy, Need for Achievement and Machiavellianism in Public Sector Employees
The present study was conducted to examine the relationship between self-efficacy, need for achievement and Machiavellianism in public sector employees. It was hypothesized that th...
Locus of Control and Machiavellianism: A Study on College Undergraduates
Locus of Control and Machiavellianism: A Study on College Undergraduates
In recent decades, the relationship between Machiavellianism and Locus of Control has received increasing attention in psychological research. Machiavellianism, which is one of the...

Back to Top