Javascript must be enabled to continue!
'And Abraham believed'. Paul, James, and the Gentiles
View through CrossRef
The New Testament is basically a collection of Jewish texts written during a period when the Jesus movement was still part of the diverse Judaism of the first century. Therefore we should expect to find examples of rabbinic biblical interpretation in the New Testament. This article suggests that the apostle Paul used midrash to create an interpretation of Gen 15:6 that allowed Gentiles to be included into the covenant without prior conversion to Judaism (Romans 4:1-12). It is argued that James, the brother of Jesus, in his interpretation of the same verse (James 2:14-24) also used midrash in order to create an interpretation that contradicted that of Paul. It is likely that this reflects an intra-Jewish debate concerning the salvation of the Gentiles. While the majority of Jews within the Jesus movement neither seem to have agreed that Gentiles were not to become Jews, nor were they obliged to observe the Torah, Paul’s solution of including the Gentiles into the covenant may have been perceived as a threat to Jewish ethnic and religious identity.
Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies
Title: 'And Abraham believed'. Paul, James, and the Gentiles
Description:
The New Testament is basically a collection of Jewish texts written during a period when the Jesus movement was still part of the diverse Judaism of the first century.
Therefore we should expect to find examples of rabbinic biblical interpretation in the New Testament.
This article suggests that the apostle Paul used midrash to create an interpretation of Gen 15:6 that allowed Gentiles to be included into the covenant without prior conversion to Judaism (Romans 4:1-12).
It is argued that James, the brother of Jesus, in his interpretation of the same verse (James 2:14-24) also used midrash in order to create an interpretation that contradicted that of Paul.
It is likely that this reflects an intra-Jewish debate concerning the salvation of the Gentiles.
While the majority of Jews within the Jesus movement neither seem to have agreed that Gentiles were not to become Jews, nor were they obliged to observe the Torah, Paul’s solution of including the Gentiles into the covenant may have been perceived as a threat to Jewish ethnic and religious identity.
Related Results
Rebekah Hyneman’s “The Lost Diamond“ – Towards Jews’ and Gentiles’ Mutual Exchange
Rebekah Hyneman’s “The Lost Diamond“ – Towards Jews’ and Gentiles’ Mutual Exchange
Abstract
In addition to presenting personal contemplations on various topics, Rebekah Hyneman’s prose and poetry has broader political and social agendas, namely bri...
What about Abraham? Abraham as Ingroup Exemplar and “Children of Abraham” as Superordinate Identity in Romans 4
What about Abraham? Abraham as Ingroup Exemplar and “Children of Abraham” as Superordinate Identity in Romans 4
In Paul’s eschatologically informed reading of Scripture, the Torah was never intended by God to be itself sufficient to secure membership in Abraham’s family. Because membership h...
Paul's Opponents
Paul's Opponents
Beginning with some of the earliest, interpreters have sought to identify the teaching of those Paul opposed in his letters. At first, this investigation was done so that the inter...
Genesis xv
Genesis xv
AbstractThe story of Abraham in Gen. xi 27-xxv 10 (11) is structured by two different literary layers in Gen. xv. The basic layer, consisting of V. 7-11, 17, 18, was originally con...
Genomic reconstruction of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England
Genomic reconstruction of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England
Abstract
The evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus leads to new variants that warrant timely epidemiological charact...
Paul's Reversal of Jews Calling Gentiles 'Dogs' (Philippians 3:2): 1600 Years of an Ideological Tale Wagging an Exegetical Dog?
Paul's Reversal of Jews Calling Gentiles 'Dogs' (Philippians 3:2): 1600 Years of an Ideological Tale Wagging an Exegetical Dog?
AbstractThe commentary tradition on Philippians 3:2 (and on Matt. 15 and Mark 7 too) has been claiming at least since Chrysostom that Jews commonly called Gentiles dogs, thereby le...
Emotional Memory Forever: The Cinematography of Paul Ewing
Emotional Memory Forever: The Cinematography of Paul Ewing
Over a period of ten years Paul Ewing documented the life of his family on film – initially using Super 8 film and then converting to VHS with the advent of the new technology. Thr...
Abraham in Islamic and Jewish Exegesis
Abraham in Islamic and Jewish Exegesis
AbstractJewish and Muslim exegetical narratives on the shared forefathers (known as midrash aggadah and al‐anbiyā ’/isrā’iliyyāt) have long been recognized as a meeting point of J...

