Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cicero and the Law

View through CrossRef
Abstract As an advocate, Cicero had intellectual preoccupations which he shared with his being a philosopher. In his theorising on advocacy, Cicero drew on his practical experience in the courts. Conversely, in his handling of law in all its forms before his public audiences, This chapter argues that Cicero's use of law as an advocate is best explained in terms of three factors: first, the nature of public pleading; second, the many uncertainties and obscurities inherent in the multifarious nature of Roman law in the first century BC, which allowed space for genuine dispute; and third, Cicero's contention, expressed most fully in the De Oratore of 55 BC, that knowledge of law per se was less important than eloquence in the winning of cases. Analysis of Cicero's speech on the disputed citizenship of L. Cornelius Balbus in 56 BC shows how his eloquent exploitation of legal obscurity before a patriotic audience worked in practice.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Cicero and the Law
Description:
Abstract As an advocate, Cicero had intellectual preoccupations which he shared with his being a philosopher.
In his theorising on advocacy, Cicero drew on his practical experience in the courts.
Conversely, in his handling of law in all its forms before his public audiences, This chapter argues that Cicero's use of law as an advocate is best explained in terms of three factors: first, the nature of public pleading; second, the many uncertainties and obscurities inherent in the multifarious nature of Roman law in the first century BC, which allowed space for genuine dispute; and third, Cicero's contention, expressed most fully in the De Oratore of 55 BC, that knowledge of law per se was less important than eloquence in the winning of cases.
Analysis of Cicero's speech on the disputed citizenship of L.
Cornelius Balbus in 56 BC shows how his eloquent exploitation of legal obscurity before a patriotic audience worked in practice.

Related Results

The “Cicero”/“Cicero” Puzzling Case
The “Cicero”/“Cicero” Puzzling Case
AbstractThis paper aims to solve the following twofold problem. Suppose that a rational speaker, Ralph, mistakenly takes (for some reason) the Roman orator Cicero and the World War...
Cicero'nun Mektuplarında Kızı Tullia
Cicero'nun Mektuplarında Kızı Tullia
Bu makale, Romalı devlet adamı, hatip ve filozof Marcus Tullius Cicero’nun mektuplarında kızı Tullia’nın hayatı ve ölümü üzerine verdiği bilgileri ve bu kaybın Cicero’nun düşünse...
Cicero’s Philosophical Works
Cicero’s Philosophical Works
Cicero (106–43 bce) was a Roman statesman, orator, and philosopher. As well as speeches, letters, and rhetorical treatises, Cicero wrote numerous philosophical works. These can be ...
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
If one puts forward a question what medical law is all about, the common answer will be medical mishaps as result of clinical negligence leading to lawsuit and/or inquires of disci...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...

Back to Top