Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Understanding Roman London
View through CrossRef
This chapter reviews the theoretical and methodological approaches that have been applied to the archaeological study of Roman London. It explores the role and relevancy of inductive and hypothetico-deductive research methodologies, contrasting the research directions taken by academics and professional fieldworkers. The chapter then describes the evolution of current approaches to stratigraphic excavation, including the pioneering approaches to open-area urban excavation developed by the archaeologists of the Museum of London. Attention is then given to how relative and absolute chronologies are established, giving emphasis to the exceptional importance of both dendrochronology and pottery type-series. A brief review of the research environment concludes by questioning the relevance of ‘Romanization’ as a concept for the study of Roman London. It is explained how the goal of this study is to use the wealth of descriptive documentation now available to understand how and why London changed through time. This justifies the adoption of a more traditional approach to the use of archaeological results to reconstruct historical narrative.
Title: Understanding Roman London
Description:
This chapter reviews the theoretical and methodological approaches that have been applied to the archaeological study of Roman London.
It explores the role and relevancy of inductive and hypothetico-deductive research methodologies, contrasting the research directions taken by academics and professional fieldworkers.
The chapter then describes the evolution of current approaches to stratigraphic excavation, including the pioneering approaches to open-area urban excavation developed by the archaeologists of the Museum of London.
Attention is then given to how relative and absolute chronologies are established, giving emphasis to the exceptional importance of both dendrochronology and pottery type-series.
A brief review of the research environment concludes by questioning the relevance of ‘Romanization’ as a concept for the study of Roman London.
It is explained how the goal of this study is to use the wealth of descriptive documentation now available to understand how and why London changed through time.
This justifies the adoption of a more traditional approach to the use of archaeological results to reconstruct historical narrative.
Related Results
Derrida and Modernism: A Review of Understanding Derrida, Understanding Modernism
Derrida and Modernism: A Review of Understanding Derrida, Understanding Modernism
Abstract: Understanding Derrida, Understanding Modernism constitutes a series of essays that explore Jacques Derrida's relationship to modernism and modernity. Jean-Michel Rabaté's...
Mapping the Roman Inscriptions of London
Mapping the Roman Inscriptions of London
This paper examines the corpus of over 500 Roman inscriptions from London by studying them as a unique category of archaeological find, one with data relating to the object, the in...
Veritism refuted? Understanding, idealization, and the facts
Veritism refuted? Understanding, idealization, and the facts
AbstractElgin offers an influential and far-reaching challenge to veritism. She takes scientific understanding to be non-factive and maintains that there are epistemically useful f...
The Sino-Russian strategic understanding on the Arab uprisings: Motivations and implications
The Sino-Russian strategic understanding on the Arab uprisings: Motivations and implications
This article seeks to analyse the emerging Sino-Russian strategic understanding on the Arab uprisings of late 2010 and beyond by investigating its underlying motivations and its im...
Roman Germania? What Germania?
Roman Germania? What Germania?
This chapter presents some general remarks about Roman Germany. The English term ‘Roman Germany’ refers to both the two Roman provinces of Germania (respectively Inferior and Super...
Thinking about Roman Imperialism: Postcolonialism, Globalisation and Beyond?
Thinking about Roman Imperialism: Postcolonialism, Globalisation and Beyond?
AbstractFor the last twenty years or so, archaeologists of Roman Britain, among other provinces, have been seeking ways of moving beyond the concept of ‘Romanisation’ as a framewor...
Holy Roman Empire 1300–1650
Holy Roman Empire 1300–1650
Between the High Middle Ages and 1806, much of Central Europe was encompassed by an entity called the Holy Roman Empire (Heiliges Römisches Reich in the German spoken by most of it...
Olives from Roman Spain: A Unique Amphora find in British Waters
Olives from Roman Spain: A Unique Amphora find in British Waters
In 1983 a fisherman in the Thames estuary at Pan Sand trawled up a Roman amphora filled with olives which had been preserved indefrutumsyrup. The jar is dated c. AD 70 ± 15. An att...