Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Use of Drone Technology for Methane Emissions Quantification - Level 4 and Level 5 Reconciliation as Per OGMP
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Methane emissions are the most potent Green House Gases from the Oil & Gas Industry. ADNOC Onshore is developing across its assets several technologies to monitor and quantify these emissions as per Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 (reference #1: United Nations Environment Programme). This paper is developing a case with the use of Drone technology -first application within ADNOC- and how it has been used to make the reconciliation between level 4 and level 5 monitoring. ADNOC Onshore pioneered in 2023 across all ADNOC Group Companies the use of Drone to monitor and quantify methane emissions from a Central Degassing Station (CDS). All the methane emissions sources were monitored by the Drone: Fugitives, Flares, Gas Fired Heaters, Oil storage and Produced Water tanks allowing to have a quantification and mapping of the methane emissions. The use of others ground technologies, High Flow Sampler (HFS) and Optical Gas Imaging Camera (OGI), in comparison with Drone's sensors has allowed us to identify some gaps between technologies and consider these gaps in our global methane quantification. A reconciliation between level 4 and level 5 measurement has been conducted as per Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 (OGMP 2.0) requirements. OGMP 2.0 is the new reporting framework aiming to improve reporting accuracy and transparency of CH4 emissions in the Oil&Gas sector. This reconciliation has been an opportunity to improve site measurement / calculations for emissions and increase the awareness to the operational teams. Reconciliation is the process of comparing source-level (Level 4) inventories with independent site-level measurements to produce Level 5 asset emissions estimates. Site-level measurements complement - rather than replace - source-level estimates, and the process of reconciliation helps improve accuracy, thoroughness and confidence in reported emissions. Reconciliation is an iterative process of investigation, year over year, and should not be thought of as a one-off comparison of two independent values. The process, like knowledge, will evolve over the years – the focus is on making credible progress year over year (reference #1: United Nations Environment Programme).
This paper is sharing the operational feedback on the use of Drone for methane measurement and as well the lessons learned following the reconciliation process with concrete recommendations. Some insights on observations made with the use of different technologies to quantify the methane emissions are developed.
Title: Use of Drone Technology for Methane Emissions Quantification - Level 4 and Level 5 Reconciliation as Per OGMP
Description:
Abstract
Methane emissions are the most potent Green House Gases from the Oil & Gas Industry.
ADNOC Onshore is developing across its assets several technologies to monitor and quantify these emissions as per Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.
0 (reference #1: United Nations Environment Programme).
This paper is developing a case with the use of Drone technology -first application within ADNOC- and how it has been used to make the reconciliation between level 4 and level 5 monitoring.
ADNOC Onshore pioneered in 2023 across all ADNOC Group Companies the use of Drone to monitor and quantify methane emissions from a Central Degassing Station (CDS).
All the methane emissions sources were monitored by the Drone: Fugitives, Flares, Gas Fired Heaters, Oil storage and Produced Water tanks allowing to have a quantification and mapping of the methane emissions.
The use of others ground technologies, High Flow Sampler (HFS) and Optical Gas Imaging Camera (OGI), in comparison with Drone's sensors has allowed us to identify some gaps between technologies and consider these gaps in our global methane quantification.
A reconciliation between level 4 and level 5 measurement has been conducted as per Oil & Gas Methane Partnership 2.
0 (OGMP 2.
0) requirements.
OGMP 2.
0 is the new reporting framework aiming to improve reporting accuracy and transparency of CH4 emissions in the Oil&Gas sector.
This reconciliation has been an opportunity to improve site measurement / calculations for emissions and increase the awareness to the operational teams.
Reconciliation is the process of comparing source-level (Level 4) inventories with independent site-level measurements to produce Level 5 asset emissions estimates.
Site-level measurements complement - rather than replace - source-level estimates, and the process of reconciliation helps improve accuracy, thoroughness and confidence in reported emissions.
Reconciliation is an iterative process of investigation, year over year, and should not be thought of as a one-off comparison of two independent values.
The process, like knowledge, will evolve over the years – the focus is on making credible progress year over year (reference #1: United Nations Environment Programme).
This paper is sharing the operational feedback on the use of Drone for methane measurement and as well the lessons learned following the reconciliation process with concrete recommendations.
Some insights on observations made with the use of different technologies to quantify the methane emissions are developed.
Related Results
Study on Characteristics and Model Prediction of Methane Emissions in Coal Mines: A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China
Study on Characteristics and Model Prediction of Methane Emissions in Coal Mines: A Case Study of Shanxi Province, China
The venting of methane from coal mining is China’s main source of methane emissions. Accurate and up-to-date methane emission factors for coal mines are significant for reporting a...
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Methane hazard often occurs in hard coal mines and causes very serious accidents and can be the reason of methane or methane and coal dust explosions. History of coal mining shows ...
Urban Methane Emissions in Auckland, New Zealand
Urban Methane Emissions in Auckland, New Zealand
<p><b>Using a mobile survey sampling technique, my research investigates the spatial distribution of urban methane emissions in Auckland, New Zealand. The mobile survey...
Addressing Misunderstandings and Supporting Sonsistency in the Methane Discourse
Addressing Misunderstandings and Supporting Sonsistency in the Methane Discourse
Abstract
Policymakers and stakeholders target methane as a significant contributor of global warming and so expectations to better understand and reduce methane emis...
PEMANFAATAN DRONE UNTUK MONITORING AKURASI PERENCANAAN TAMBANG BATUBARA TERBUKA
PEMANFAATAN DRONE UNTUK MONITORING AKURASI PERENCANAAN TAMBANG BATUBARA TERBUKA
ABSTRAK Pertambangan batubara di Indonesia telah mengalami pasang surut harga yang sangat fluktuatif sejak 2012. Hal tersebut berdampak langsung kepada para pelaku usaha pertambang...
ROMEO - ROmanian Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas
ROMEO - ROmanian Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas
<p>According to UNFCCC statistics, in 2015 Romania was the country in the European Union that reported the highest emissions of CH<sub>4</sub&...
An Energy-Efficient Logistic Drone Routing Method considering Dynamic Drone Speed and Payload
An Energy-Efficient Logistic Drone Routing Method considering Dynamic Drone Speed and Payload
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), or drone is recognized for its potential to improve efficiency and address last-mile delivery issues. As a result, there has been a lot of activity i...
Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams
Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams
Underground coal mining of gas-bearing coal seams is accompanied by the emission of large amounts of methane, which increases with depth. Coal seam methane is not only a major caus...

