Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Nigerian Refugees in Cameroon: Understanding the Politics of Voluntary Refugee Repatriation
View through CrossRef
The paper observes that the inability of the Nigerian government to defeat Boko Haram has created a stream of problems for Cameroon as the paper identifies some Boko Haram activities in Cameroon is prompting a premature repatriation of Nigerian refugees by the Cameroonian government. According to the National Emergency Agency reports in 2015 the Cameroonian government forcefully repatriated 3.500 Nigerian refugees, the report added that the refugees were not informed of their return and were transported like animals, and dropped at home in cruel conditions. The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (2004) explains that the premature repatriation of Nigerian refugee is a violation of the principle of non-refoulement as the condition in the North East is not conducive for the repatriation of Nigerian refugees. Thus, a tripartite agreement was reached between Nigeria, Cameroon, and UNHCR to ensure the safety and legality of the return of Nigerian refugees. The paper investigates the efforts of the Nigerian government towards the proper repatriation and reintegration of the refugees in safety and dignity. Using secondary data, the paper concluded that repatriation of the Nigerian refugees intended to address the humanitarian needs of the refugees is rather serving the political interest of various actor. The paper recommends a sustainable reintegration framework be established for the returnees.
Macrothink Institute, Inc.
Title: Nigerian Refugees in Cameroon: Understanding the Politics of Voluntary Refugee Repatriation
Description:
The paper observes that the inability of the Nigerian government to defeat Boko Haram has created a stream of problems for Cameroon as the paper identifies some Boko Haram activities in Cameroon is prompting a premature repatriation of Nigerian refugees by the Cameroonian government.
According to the National Emergency Agency reports in 2015 the Cameroonian government forcefully repatriated 3.
500 Nigerian refugees, the report added that the refugees were not informed of their return and were transported like animals, and dropped at home in cruel conditions.
The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (2004) explains that the premature repatriation of Nigerian refugee is a violation of the principle of non-refoulement as the condition in the North East is not conducive for the repatriation of Nigerian refugees.
Thus, a tripartite agreement was reached between Nigeria, Cameroon, and UNHCR to ensure the safety and legality of the return of Nigerian refugees.
The paper investigates the efforts of the Nigerian government towards the proper repatriation and reintegration of the refugees in safety and dignity.
Using secondary data, the paper concluded that repatriation of the Nigerian refugees intended to address the humanitarian needs of the refugees is rather serving the political interest of various actor.
The paper recommends a sustainable reintegration framework be established for the returnees.
.
Related Results
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Repatriation of South Sudanese refugees from the West Nile districts, Uganda. What do we learn from the process?
Repatriation of South Sudanese refugees from the West Nile districts, Uganda. What do we learn from the process?
Introduction: Repatriation is a fundamental and often preferred solution to the refugee crisis around the world. This study explored the process of repatriation of the South Sudane...
ESCAPIST TOKEN REPATRIATION APPROACH IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE PROTECTION AND THE WAY AHEAD
ESCAPIST TOKEN REPATRIATION APPROACH IN INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE PROTECTION AND THE WAY AHEAD
Repatriation is one of the permanent solutions under the UN Refugee Convention 1951. This is also considered as the most desirable solution, as the refugees return to their country...
Legally literate but disempowered: urban refugees and national screening mechanism in Thailand
Legally literate but disempowered: urban refugees and national screening mechanism in Thailand
This dissertation examines the relationship between legal literacy, empowerment, and protection outcomes among urban refugees and asylum seekers in Thailand, focusing on the 2019 N...
Refugees and National Security in Kenya: A Case Study of Eastleigh, Kamukunji Constituency, Nairobi County
Refugees and National Security in Kenya: A Case Study of Eastleigh, Kamukunji Constituency, Nairobi County
Purpose: This study is about refugees and national security in Kenya: Case Study of Eastleigh, Kamukunji Constituency, Nairobi County. The research examined whether refugees are a ...
The Myth of the Borderless World: Refugees and Repatriation Policy
The Myth of the Borderless World: Refugees and Repatriation Policy
This essay explores the impact of the end of the Cold War on the counter-refugee-crisis policies of the United Nations and its strongest member states. I argue that during the Cold...
The “pressure” of being an adolescent in the West Bank, Palestine: prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension
The “pressure” of being an adolescent in the West Bank, Palestine: prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension
IntroductionOver 27% of adults in Palestine are reported to have hypertension, and there is limited knowledge about hypertension rates among Palestinian adolescents residing in the...

