Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL STAGING IN EARLY-STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
View through CrossRef
Background: Early-stage ovarian cancer is a critical area of study, where accurate staging plays a vital role in determining prognosis and treatment strategies. Surgical staging is considered the gold standard in managing early-stage ovarian cancer, yet the comparative impact on quality of life (QOL) between surgical and clinical staging remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of surgical staging procedures on the quality of life in patients with presumed early-stage ovarian cancer.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over one year at Lahore General Hospital, involving 56 participants. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group (clinical staging) and the experimental group (surgical staging). Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older with early-stage ovarian or uterine abdominal masses, elevated tumor markers (β-HCG, α-FP, CA 125), and the ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria included metastasis, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, pregnancy, or uncontrolled medical conditions. The quality of life was measured using the FACT-O scale, assessing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as concerns related to ovarian cancer.
Results: Data from 50 participants were analyzed. The average age of patients was 45.64 ± 14.95 years. Most participants were diagnosed with Stage 1 ovarian cancer (62%). The surgical staging group reported significantly higher quality of life scores across all domains—Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Additional Concerns (ACO)—with p-values of 0.000 for all comparisons.
Conclusion: Surgical staging significantly improves the quality of life in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, particularly in physical, emotional, and social well-being, when compared to clinical staging. This highlights the superior impact of surgical staging on patient outcomes and quality of life.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARISON OF OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL STAGING IN EARLY-STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
Description:
Background: Early-stage ovarian cancer is a critical area of study, where accurate staging plays a vital role in determining prognosis and treatment strategies.
Surgical staging is considered the gold standard in managing early-stage ovarian cancer, yet the comparative impact on quality of life (QOL) between surgical and clinical staging remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of surgical staging procedures on the quality of life in patients with presumed early-stage ovarian cancer.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over one year at Lahore General Hospital, involving 56 participants.
Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group (clinical staging) and the experimental group (surgical staging).
Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older with early-stage ovarian or uterine abdominal masses, elevated tumor markers (β-HCG, α-FP, CA 125), and the ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria included metastasis, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, pregnancy, or uncontrolled medical conditions.
The quality of life was measured using the FACT-O scale, assessing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as concerns related to ovarian cancer.
Results: Data from 50 participants were analyzed.
The average age of patients was 45.
64 ± 14.
95 years.
Most participants were diagnosed with Stage 1 ovarian cancer (62%).
The surgical staging group reported significantly higher quality of life scores across all domains—Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Additional Concerns (ACO)—with p-values of 0.
000 for all comparisons.
Conclusion: Surgical staging significantly improves the quality of life in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, particularly in physical, emotional, and social well-being, when compared to clinical staging.
This highlights the superior impact of surgical staging on patient outcomes and quality of life.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for 5% of all cancer deaths and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. While the...
Abstract 2208: Clinicopathological and genetic study of ovarian cancer in Algerian women: First report
Abstract 2208: Clinicopathological and genetic study of ovarian cancer in Algerian women: First report
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer represents the fourth most common cause of mortality among Algerian women. Of all gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer caus...
Abstract B8: Molecular subtyping of epithelial ovarian cancer reveals connections to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes
Abstract B8: Molecular subtyping of epithelial ovarian cancer reveals connections to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes
Abstract
Aim: Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal female cancers. It is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms and the different histologic subtypes are ...
Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery
In the first part of this dissertation an assessment was made on current available
evidence regarding outcomes in minimally invasive gastrectomy in comparison to open
gastrectomy. ...
P–688 Assessment of ovarian vascularity by three-dimensional vaginal power Doppler on day two of menstrual cycle to predict the number of mature eggs collected
P–688 Assessment of ovarian vascularity by three-dimensional vaginal power Doppler on day two of menstrual cycle to predict the number of mature eggs collected
Abstract
Study question
Could ovarian vascularity indices, measured by 3-dimensional (3D) vaginal power Doppler, predict the num...
Abstract DP-007: POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME AND OVARIAN CANCER RISK: A MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS
Abstract DP-007: POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME AND OVARIAN CANCER RISK: A MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a complex endocrine disorder that has an estimated prevalence of 4-21% in reproductive aged women, is characte...

