Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL STAGING IN EARLY-STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
View through CrossRef
Background: Early-stage ovarian cancer is a critical area of study, where accurate staging plays a vital role in determining prognosis and treatment strategies. Surgical staging is considered the gold standard in managing early-stage ovarian cancer, yet the comparative impact on quality of life (QOL) between surgical and clinical staging remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of surgical staging procedures on the quality of life in patients with presumed early-stage ovarian cancer.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over one year at Lahore General Hospital, involving 56 participants. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group (clinical staging) and the experimental group (surgical staging). Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older with early-stage ovarian or uterine abdominal masses, elevated tumor markers (β-HCG, α-FP, CA 125), and the ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria included metastasis, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, pregnancy, or uncontrolled medical conditions. The quality of life was measured using the FACT-O scale, assessing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as concerns related to ovarian cancer.
Results: Data from 50 participants were analyzed. The average age of patients was 45.64 ± 14.95 years. Most participants were diagnosed with Stage 1 ovarian cancer (62%). The surgical staging group reported significantly higher quality of life scores across all domains—Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Additional Concerns (ACO)—with p-values of 0.000 for all comparisons.
Conclusion: Surgical staging significantly improves the quality of life in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, particularly in physical, emotional, and social well-being, when compared to clinical staging. This highlights the superior impact of surgical staging on patient outcomes and quality of life.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARISON OF OPEN VS. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL STAGING IN EARLY-STAGE OVARIAN CANCER
Description:
Background: Early-stage ovarian cancer is a critical area of study, where accurate staging plays a vital role in determining prognosis and treatment strategies.
Surgical staging is considered the gold standard in managing early-stage ovarian cancer, yet the comparative impact on quality of life (QOL) between surgical and clinical staging remains underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of surgical staging procedures on the quality of life in patients with presumed early-stage ovarian cancer.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted over one year at Lahore General Hospital, involving 56 participants.
Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group (clinical staging) and the experimental group (surgical staging).
Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older with early-stage ovarian or uterine abdominal masses, elevated tumor markers (β-HCG, α-FP, CA 125), and the ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria included metastasis, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, pregnancy, or uncontrolled medical conditions.
The quality of life was measured using the FACT-O scale, assessing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as concerns related to ovarian cancer.
Results: Data from 50 participants were analyzed.
The average age of patients was 45.
64 ± 14.
95 years.
Most participants were diagnosed with Stage 1 ovarian cancer (62%).
The surgical staging group reported significantly higher quality of life scores across all domains—Physical Well-Being (PWB), Social Well-Being (SWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and Additional Concerns (ACO)—with p-values of 0.
000 for all comparisons.
Conclusion: Surgical staging significantly improves the quality of life in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, particularly in physical, emotional, and social well-being, when compared to clinical staging.
This highlights the superior impact of surgical staging on patient outcomes and quality of life.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for 5% of all cancer deaths and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. While the...
Abstract B8: Molecular subtyping of epithelial ovarian cancer reveals connections to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes
Abstract B8: Molecular subtyping of epithelial ovarian cancer reveals connections to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes
Abstract
Aim: Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal female cancers. It is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms and the different histologic subtypes are ...
Abstract DP-007: POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME AND OVARIAN CANCER RISK: A MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS
Abstract DP-007: POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME AND OVARIAN CANCER RISK: A MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a complex endocrine disorder that has an estimated prevalence of 4-21% in reproductive aged women, is characte...
Abstract 875: PAX8 protein detection in serum of patients with serous ovarian cancer
Abstract 875: PAX8 protein detection in serum of patients with serous ovarian cancer
Abstract
Introduction: The paired-box (PAX) genes encode a family of transcription factors (TFs) with critical roles in the formation of tissues and organs during em...
Abstract A65: Snail, a potent inducer of global DNA methylation in ovarian cancer
Abstract A65: Snail, a potent inducer of global DNA methylation in ovarian cancer
Abstract
Snail plays a critical role in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). To investigate the role of Snail in this event, we established inducible Snai...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...


