Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Clinical Comparison between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia

View through CrossRef
Background: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is commonly performed by double space technique (DST) and single space segment technique (SST) or needle-through-needle technique (NNT). Aims and Objectives: We designed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on time required by the procedure, the number of attempts, and a level of sensory, side effects and cost-effectiveness. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 30) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 30). In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1–2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3–4 interspace. Results: The single space (needle-through-needle) technique for CSE takes less time, less number of spinal punctures. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. Sensory level at T10 on 5 min in group I was 90% and group II was 100% whereas at T8 it was 10% in group I; sensory level at T10, T8 and T6 on 10 min. in group I were 53.3%, 43.3% and 3.3% respectively whereas in group II were 80%, 16.7% and 3.3% respectively; sensory level at T10, T8, T6 and T4 on 15 min. in group I were 6.7%, 43.3%, 50% and 0% respectively whereas in group II were 23.3%, 50%, 23.3% and 3.3% respectively; and sensory level at T4, T6 and T8 on 20 min. in group I were 0%, 73.3% and 26.7% respectively whereas in group II were 16.7%, 33.3% and 50% respectively. Conclusions: Single-space (needle-through-needle) CSEA takes less time, less number of spinal punctures and results in improved patient satisfaction. There were no differences in intraoperative variables between the DST and SST for CSEA.
Title: A Clinical Comparison between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia
Description:
Background: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is commonly performed by double space technique (DST) and single space segment technique (SST) or needle-through-needle technique (NNT).
Aims and Objectives: We designed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on time required by the procedure, the number of attempts, and a level of sensory, side effects and cost-effectiveness.
Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 30) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 30).
In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique.
In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1–2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3–4 interspace.
Results: The single space (needle-through-needle) technique for CSE takes less time, less number of spinal punctures.
There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects.
Sensory level at T10 on 5 min in group I was 90% and group II was 100% whereas at T8 it was 10% in group I; sensory level at T10, T8 and T6 on 10 min.
in group I were 53.
3%, 43.
3% and 3.
3% respectively whereas in group II were 80%, 16.
7% and 3.
3% respectively; sensory level at T10, T8, T6 and T4 on 15 min.
in group I were 6.
7%, 43.
3%, 50% and 0% respectively whereas in group II were 23.
3%, 50%, 23.
3% and 3.
3% respectively; and sensory level at T4, T6 and T8 on 20 min.
in group I were 0%, 73.
3% and 26.
7% respectively whereas in group II were 16.
7%, 33.
3% and 50% respectively.
Conclusions: Single-space (needle-through-needle) CSEA takes less time, less number of spinal punctures and results in improved patient satisfaction.
There were no differences in intraoperative variables between the DST and SST for CSEA.

Related Results

Spinal Epidural Abscess in COVID-19 patients
Spinal Epidural Abscess in COVID-19 patients
Abstract Objective: To report the peculiarities of spinal epidural abscess in COVID-19 patients, because we observed an unusually high number of these patients following th...
Spinal Anesthesia Speeds Active Postoperative Rewarming 
Spinal Anesthesia Speeds Active Postoperative Rewarming 
Background Redistribution of body heat decreases core temperature more during general than regional anesthesia. However, the combination of anesthetic- and sedative-ind...
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of single-dose spinal versus epidural analgesia for labor pain to verify if applying a single dose spinal analgesia is ...
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope
In order to solve the nursing problems of local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy, a nursing method and experience based on local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy was prop...
THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA/ GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPROSCOPY SURGERY
THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA/ GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPROSCOPY SURGERY
Background:Laparoscopic surgeries are usually done under general anesthesia, but many patients with major medical problems sometimes cannot tolerate such anesthesia, and thoracic s...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...

Back to Top