Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Reserves Estimation for a Coalbed Well

View through CrossRef
Abstract A linear material-balance plot constructed based on "P/Z versus cumulative production" is frequently used to define the Original-Gas-In-Place (OGIP). The defined OGIP is then used to estimate the reserves. However, a linear P/Z plot can only be obtained if the well is producing free gas from a conventional gas reservoir with no water influx. For a coalbed well, the tightness and the reactive gas-rock nature deprive the gas of the needed pore spaces and the time for the material-balance to take place. Consequently, a P/Z plot constructed based on the observed apparent pressure-production-time data bends to the right, similar to a P/Z plot of a conventional gas well subject to water influx. Therefore, several authors have proposed to construct P/Z plot using "Z*" instead of the original Z values. The values of Z* are calculated using Z* function. Z* function allows for calculating Z* values that are much smaller than the original Z values. Z* function also allows for calculating Z* values that are decreasing with decreasing pressure. These characteristics allow the otherwise bending curve to converge into a straight line, with the x-axis intercept as the OGIP. This paper presents the results of conducting a material-balance evaluation using a commonly used material-balance equation and the original Z values for a coalbed well. Intuition would lead us to believe that such an evaluation would not lead to any useful conclusion. However, as presented in this paper, we found that such an evaluation not only revealed the production characteristics of a coalbed well but also provided us with a method for forecasting future production rates. Subsequently, they can be used to estimate the gas reserves. Introduction Material-Balance evaluations have been commonly applied to estimate the original-hydrocarbon-in-place for conventional reservoirs. Should the evaluation is conducted for a gas reservoir with no aquifer influx the material-balance equation can be simplified to the following linear equation. Equation (1) (Available in full paper) Consequently, a common approach for determining the OGIP for a volumetric gas reservoir is to plot the historical P/Z vs. cumulative production, Gp, based on Equation (1). A linear line is expected from such a plot with the intercept along the x-axis (cumulative production) as the OGIP or the ultimate gas recovery, and the recovery as the cumulative production to any P/Z value at the abandonment pressure. However, should Equation (1) is applied to a coalbed well the plot bends to the right (upward), similar to that of a gas well experiencing influx, indicative of continue additional pressure support. The simplicity of the P/Z plots has led to many efforts to extend this approach to coalbed wells. Of which, Z* function approach of King1 is the most familiar one. In the Z* function approach the original historical Z required in Equation (1) is replaced with Z* calculated based on the following equation. Equation (2) (Available in full paper) King defines Ck as a function of cumulative pressure drop and other parameters.
Title: Reserves Estimation for a Coalbed Well
Description:
Abstract A linear material-balance plot constructed based on "P/Z versus cumulative production" is frequently used to define the Original-Gas-In-Place (OGIP).
The defined OGIP is then used to estimate the reserves.
However, a linear P/Z plot can only be obtained if the well is producing free gas from a conventional gas reservoir with no water influx.
For a coalbed well, the tightness and the reactive gas-rock nature deprive the gas of the needed pore spaces and the time for the material-balance to take place.
Consequently, a P/Z plot constructed based on the observed apparent pressure-production-time data bends to the right, similar to a P/Z plot of a conventional gas well subject to water influx.
Therefore, several authors have proposed to construct P/Z plot using "Z*" instead of the original Z values.
The values of Z* are calculated using Z* function.
Z* function allows for calculating Z* values that are much smaller than the original Z values.
Z* function also allows for calculating Z* values that are decreasing with decreasing pressure.
These characteristics allow the otherwise bending curve to converge into a straight line, with the x-axis intercept as the OGIP.
This paper presents the results of conducting a material-balance evaluation using a commonly used material-balance equation and the original Z values for a coalbed well.
Intuition would lead us to believe that such an evaluation would not lead to any useful conclusion.
However, as presented in this paper, we found that such an evaluation not only revealed the production characteristics of a coalbed well but also provided us with a method for forecasting future production rates.
Subsequently, they can be used to estimate the gas reserves.
Introduction Material-Balance evaluations have been commonly applied to estimate the original-hydrocarbon-in-place for conventional reservoirs.
Should the evaluation is conducted for a gas reservoir with no aquifer influx the material-balance equation can be simplified to the following linear equation.
Equation (1) (Available in full paper) Consequently, a common approach for determining the OGIP for a volumetric gas reservoir is to plot the historical P/Z vs.
cumulative production, Gp, based on Equation (1).
A linear line is expected from such a plot with the intercept along the x-axis (cumulative production) as the OGIP or the ultimate gas recovery, and the recovery as the cumulative production to any P/Z value at the abandonment pressure.
However, should Equation (1) is applied to a coalbed well the plot bends to the right (upward), similar to that of a gas well experiencing influx, indicative of continue additional pressure support.
The simplicity of the P/Z plots has led to many efforts to extend this approach to coalbed wells.
Of which, Z* function approach of King1 is the most familiar one.
In the Z* function approach the original historical Z required in Equation (1) is replaced with Z* calculated based on the following equation.
Equation (2) (Available in full paper) King defines Ck as a function of cumulative pressure drop and other parameters.

Related Results

The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
Abstract  Coalbed methane has been explored in many basins worldwide for 30 years, and has been developed commercially in some of the basins. Many researchers have described the ch...
A Method to Improve Computational Efficiency of Productivity Evaluation with Rectangular Coalbed Methane Reservoir
A Method to Improve Computational Efficiency of Productivity Evaluation with Rectangular Coalbed Methane Reservoir
Computational efficiency is the key factor to be considered in the productivity evaluation of rectangular coalbed methane reservoir. There are three main factors affecting the calc...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Probabilistic Reserves Estimation of Mara West Field, Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela: Case Study
Probabilistic Reserves Estimation of Mara West Field, Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela: Case Study
Abstract Mara west field located onshore Lake Maracaibo in Western Venezuela, was discovered in 1951 by well DM-115. Other wells drilled afterwards showed rather ...
Can Reasonable Certainty be Assessed from Disclosed Proved Reserves Revisions?
Can Reasonable Certainty be Assessed from Disclosed Proved Reserves Revisions?
Abstract If properly estimated, technical revisions to disclosed proved reserves can be used to establish the reasonable certainty of both proved developed and undev...
Oil Reserves In Alberta
Oil Reserves In Alberta
Abstract Introduction IT IS OF CONSIDERABLE INTEREST TO KNOW the total amount of conventional crude oil which can be re...
Determining Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
Determining Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
ABSTRACT The major objective of this paper is to identify the most generally applicable method to analyze pressure transient tests in coalbed methane reservoirs. The...
Pool‐Forming Stages and Enrichment Models of Medium‐ to High‐Rank Coalbed Methane
Pool‐Forming Stages and Enrichment Models of Medium‐ to High‐Rank Coalbed Methane
Abstract:The pool‐forming mechanism of coalbed methane has its own characteristics. In this paper, based on studies on the typical coal‐bearing basins in China, it is pointed out t...

Back to Top