Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Copper-Nickel Sulfide Ore-Bearing Formations

View through CrossRef
Abstract The sulfide copper-nickel deposits of the Noril’sk region (Noril’sk I, Talnakh, Octyabrskaya) were formed during the late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic episode of basaltic extrusion. Spatially and genetically they are related to a group of ultramafic/mafic layered intrusions, and they consist of different types of ores that were formed at different stages. The history of the study of the Noril ‘sk deposits can be considered as a half-century succession of discussions devoted to the source of the ore materials and to the conditions of formation of the mineralization. The most reliable genetic hypothesis is that of the primary magmatic nature of the ore formation as originally proposed by V.K. Kotulsky and M.N. Godlevsky. The copper-nickel deposits of the Noril’sk region are attributed to the development of a volcanic-intrusive ore-magmatic association. On the basis of their overall geologic-petrologic characteristics and structural-tectonic setting [28], these deposits can be regarded as an independent event. The major distinguishing characteristic of these deposits is the interconnected development of the ultramafic/mafic and similar (with respect to composition) komatiitic volcanic rocks and layered intrusive complexes which contain disseminated and massive copper-nickel mineralization. The deposits were formed at particular stages in the development of cratons and ancient platforms, and they occur in regions of intercontinental rifting. The major ore-bearing locations in the greenstone belts of Archean cratons (such as Wiluna-Norseman in Australia, the Rhodesian craton in Zimbabwe etc.), the deposits of the Pechenga ore-bearing region in the Pechenga-Imandra-Varzuga belt of the Baltic shield; and the Noril’sk ore-bearing
Title: Copper-Nickel Sulfide Ore-Bearing Formations
Description:
Abstract The sulfide copper-nickel deposits of the Noril’sk region (Noril’sk I, Talnakh, Octyabrskaya) were formed during the late Paleozoic to early Mesozoic episode of basaltic extrusion.
Spatially and genetically they are related to a group of ultramafic/mafic layered intrusions, and they consist of different types of ores that were formed at different stages.
The history of the study of the Noril ‘sk deposits can be considered as a half-century succession of discussions devoted to the source of the ore materials and to the conditions of formation of the mineralization.
The most reliable genetic hypothesis is that of the primary magmatic nature of the ore formation as originally proposed by V.
K.
Kotulsky and M.
N.
Godlevsky.
The copper-nickel deposits of the Noril’sk region are attributed to the development of a volcanic-intrusive ore-magmatic association.
On the basis of their overall geologic-petrologic characteristics and structural-tectonic setting [28], these deposits can be regarded as an independent event.
The major distinguishing characteristic of these deposits is the interconnected development of the ultramafic/mafic and similar (with respect to composition) komatiitic volcanic rocks and layered intrusive complexes which contain disseminated and massive copper-nickel mineralization.
The deposits were formed at particular stages in the development of cratons and ancient platforms, and they occur in regions of intercontinental rifting.
The major ore-bearing locations in the greenstone belts of Archean cratons (such as Wiluna-Norseman in Australia, the Rhodesian craton in Zimbabwe etc.
), the deposits of the Pechenga ore-bearing region in the Pechenga-Imandra-Varzuga belt of the Baltic shield; and the Noril’sk ore-bearing.

Related Results

Ore‐Bearing Formations of the Precambrian in South China and Their Prospects
Ore‐Bearing Formations of the Precambrian in South China and Their Prospects
Abstract  In the Precambrian System of the Yangtze and Cathaysian plates six ore‐bearing formations can be identified: the Cu‐Pb‐Zn‐bearing formations in volcanic rocks of marine f...
Authigenesis at the Urals Massive Sulfide Deposits: Insight from Pyrite Nodules Hosted in Ore Diagenites
Authigenesis at the Urals Massive Sulfide Deposits: Insight from Pyrite Nodules Hosted in Ore Diagenites
The pyrite nodules from ore diagenites of the Urals massive sulfide deposits associated with various background sedimentary rocks are studied using optical and electron microscopy ...
Study of High-sulfur Natural Gas Field Water Treatment
Study of High-sulfur Natural Gas Field Water Treatment
Abstract High-sulfide gas field water with more than 100mg/L hydrogen sulfide account for 54.5% of gas wells in the Southern and Eastern gas fields of Sichuan, Ch...
Sulfate/sulfide removal from wastewater by lab-scale microbial fuel cell
Sulfate/sulfide removal from wastewater by lab-scale microbial fuel cell
Sulfate/sulfide-containing wastewater is a widespread environmental contaminant resulting from human activities. These pollutants have negative impact on natural ecosystems and hum...
Tectonic Controls on the Formation of the Liwu Cu‐rich Sulfide Deposit in the Jianglang Dome, S W China
Tectonic Controls on the Formation of the Liwu Cu‐rich Sulfide Deposit in the Jianglang Dome, S W China
Abstract. The Liwu Cu‐rich sulfide deposit occurs within the Jianglang dome in the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau. The dome consists of a core, a middle slab and a cover se...
Main Mineralization Mechanism of Magmatic Sulphide Deposits in China
Main Mineralization Mechanism of Magmatic Sulphide Deposits in China
AbstractBefore intruding, primary magmas have undergone liquation and partial crystallization at depth; as a result the magmas are partitioned into barren magma, ore–bearing magma,...

Back to Top