Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Interdisciplinarity in the Making

View through CrossRef
A cognitive ethnography of how bioengineering scientists create innovative modeling methods. In this first full-scale, long-term cognitive ethnography by a philosopher of science, Nancy J. Nersessian offers an account of how scientists at the interdisciplinary frontiers of bioengineering create novel problem-solving methods. Bioengineering scientists model complex dynamical biological systems using concepts, methods, materials, and other resources drawn primarily from engineering. They aim to understand these systems sufficiently to control or intervene in them. What Nersessian examines here is how cutting-edge bioengineering scientists integrate the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of practice. Her findings and conclusions have broad implications for researchers in philosophy, science studies, cognitive science, and interdisciplinary studies, as well as scientists, educators, policy makers, and funding agencies. In studying the epistemic practices of scientists, Nersessian pushes the boundaries of the philosophy of science and cognitive science into areas not ventured before. She recounts a decades-long, wide-ranging, and richly detailed investigation of the innovative interdisciplinary modeling practices of bioengineering researchers in four university laboratories. She argues and demonstrates that the methods of cognitive ethnography and qualitative data analysis, placed in the framework of distributed cognition, provide the tools for a philosophical analysis of how scientific discoveries arise from complex systems in which the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of problem-solving are integrated into the epistemic practices of scientists. Specifically, she looks at how interdisciplinary environments shape problem-solving. Although Nersessian's case material is drawn from the bioengineering sciences, her analytic framework and methodological approach are directly applicable to scientific research in a broader, more general sense, as well.
The MIT Press
Title: Interdisciplinarity in the Making
Description:
A cognitive ethnography of how bioengineering scientists create innovative modeling methods.
In this first full-scale, long-term cognitive ethnography by a philosopher of science, Nancy J.
Nersessian offers an account of how scientists at the interdisciplinary frontiers of bioengineering create novel problem-solving methods.
Bioengineering scientists model complex dynamical biological systems using concepts, methods, materials, and other resources drawn primarily from engineering.
They aim to understand these systems sufficiently to control or intervene in them.
What Nersessian examines here is how cutting-edge bioengineering scientists integrate the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of practice.
Her findings and conclusions have broad implications for researchers in philosophy, science studies, cognitive science, and interdisciplinary studies, as well as scientists, educators, policy makers, and funding agencies.
In studying the epistemic practices of scientists, Nersessian pushes the boundaries of the philosophy of science and cognitive science into areas not ventured before.
She recounts a decades-long, wide-ranging, and richly detailed investigation of the innovative interdisciplinary modeling practices of bioengineering researchers in four university laboratories.
She argues and demonstrates that the methods of cognitive ethnography and qualitative data analysis, placed in the framework of distributed cognition, provide the tools for a philosophical analysis of how scientific discoveries arise from complex systems in which the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of problem-solving are integrated into the epistemic practices of scientists.
Specifically, she looks at how interdisciplinary environments shape problem-solving.
Although Nersessian's case material is drawn from the bioengineering sciences, her analytic framework and methodological approach are directly applicable to scientific research in a broader, more general sense, as well.

Related Results

INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN THE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEERS
INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN THE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGINEERS
The article reveals the interconnection of economic, scientific and technical factors in engineering training. The article explores that global enhanced interdisciplinarity has bee...
The “Problem” of Interdisciplinarity in Theory, Practice, and History
The “Problem” of Interdisciplinarity in Theory, Practice, and History
Interdisciplinarity is among the most talked about but most misunderstood topics in education on all levels today. Seen as the savior of research and teaching, especially in univer...
Current Interdisciplinarity Measures Fail to Reflect Authors' Perspectives
Current Interdisciplinarity Measures Fail to Reflect Authors' Perspectives
The objective of this paper is to compare bibliometrically constructed indexes of interdisciplinarity with authors’ self-assessments of the interdisciplinarity of their own papers,...
Managing Interdisciplinarity in Urban Planning Research
Managing Interdisciplinarity in Urban Planning Research
In contemporary research, interdisciplinarity is a common condition. This is especially true for urban planning where the need to leverage fast-evolving technology, emerging trends...
Interdisciplinarity in practice: three decades of Earth systems science workshops at the Aspen Global Change Institute
Interdisciplinarity in practice: three decades of Earth systems science workshops at the Aspen Global Change Institute
Interdisciplinarity is widely believed to be necessary to further knowledge about complex systems and inform potential solutions. Yet the practice of fostering it is not well artic...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN HEALTH: THE MEDICAL HUMANITIES
INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN HEALTH: THE MEDICAL HUMANITIES
Studies in the philosophy of science indicate that the major innovations of recent decades are due to interdisciplinarity. This article addresses the growing relevance of interdisc...

Back to Top