Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Interdisciplinarity in the Making

View through CrossRef
A cognitive ethnography of how bioengineering scientists create innovative modeling methods. In this first full-scale, long-term cognitive ethnography by a philosopher of science, Nancy J. Nersessian offers an account of how scientists at the interdisciplinary frontiers of bioengineering create novel problem-solving methods. Bioengineering scientists model complex dynamical biological systems using concepts, methods, materials, and other resources drawn primarily from engineering. They aim to understand these systems sufficiently to control or intervene in them. What Nersessian examines here is how cutting-edge bioengineering scientists integrate the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of practice. Her findings and conclusions have broad implications for researchers in philosophy, science studies, cognitive science, and interdisciplinary studies, as well as scientists, educators, policy makers, and funding agencies. In studying the epistemic practices of scientists, Nersessian pushes the boundaries of the philosophy of science and cognitive science into areas not ventured before. She recounts a decades-long, wide-ranging, and richly detailed investigation of the innovative interdisciplinary modeling practices of bioengineering researchers in four university laboratories. She argues and demonstrates that the methods of cognitive ethnography and qualitative data analysis, placed in the framework of distributed cognition, provide the tools for a philosophical analysis of how scientific discoveries arise from complex systems in which the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of problem-solving are integrated into the epistemic practices of scientists. Specifically, she looks at how interdisciplinary environments shape problem-solving. Although Nersessian's case material is drawn from the bioengineering sciences, her analytic framework and methodological approach are directly applicable to scientific research in a broader, more general sense, as well.
The MIT Press
Title: Interdisciplinarity in the Making
Description:
A cognitive ethnography of how bioengineering scientists create innovative modeling methods.
In this first full-scale, long-term cognitive ethnography by a philosopher of science, Nancy J.
Nersessian offers an account of how scientists at the interdisciplinary frontiers of bioengineering create novel problem-solving methods.
Bioengineering scientists model complex dynamical biological systems using concepts, methods, materials, and other resources drawn primarily from engineering.
They aim to understand these systems sufficiently to control or intervene in them.
What Nersessian examines here is how cutting-edge bioengineering scientists integrate the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of practice.
Her findings and conclusions have broad implications for researchers in philosophy, science studies, cognitive science, and interdisciplinary studies, as well as scientists, educators, policy makers, and funding agencies.
In studying the epistemic practices of scientists, Nersessian pushes the boundaries of the philosophy of science and cognitive science into areas not ventured before.
She recounts a decades-long, wide-ranging, and richly detailed investigation of the innovative interdisciplinary modeling practices of bioengineering researchers in four university laboratories.
She argues and demonstrates that the methods of cognitive ethnography and qualitative data analysis, placed in the framework of distributed cognition, provide the tools for a philosophical analysis of how scientific discoveries arise from complex systems in which the cognitive, social, material, and cultural dimensions of problem-solving are integrated into the epistemic practices of scientists.
Specifically, she looks at how interdisciplinary environments shape problem-solving.
Although Nersessian's case material is drawn from the bioengineering sciences, her analytic framework and methodological approach are directly applicable to scientific research in a broader, more general sense, as well.

Related Results

Current Interdisciplinarity Measures Fail to Reflect Authors' Perspectives
Current Interdisciplinarity Measures Fail to Reflect Authors' Perspectives
The objective of this paper is to compare bibliometrically constructed indexes of interdisciplinarity with authors’ self-assessments of the interdisciplinarity of their own papers,...
Managing Interdisciplinarity in Urban Planning Research
Managing Interdisciplinarity in Urban Planning Research
In contemporary research, interdisciplinarity is a common condition. This is especially true for urban planning where the need to leverage fast-evolving technology, emerging trends...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Disciplined Interdisciplinarity
Disciplined Interdisciplinarity
Interdisciplinarity is a word often used in contemporary universities, but little understood or practiced. “Professionalism” tends to keep academics within the narrow boundaries of...
Interdisciplinary Computing: An Epistemological Examination and Proposed PLOs
Interdisciplinary Computing: An Epistemological Examination and Proposed PLOs
Abstract The increase in the number of institutions offering degrees in interdis ciplinary computing raises a set of questions at the epistemological level. A set of...
Translation Typology and the Interdisciplinarity of Translatology
Translation Typology and the Interdisciplinarity of Translatology
In this paper the issue of interdisciplinarity in translatology is discussed in relation to the problem of translation typology, and it is suggested that typology is not only a cor...
Women Doctoral Students and Value Creation through Interdisciplinarity: A Focus on The Mechanisms
Women Doctoral Students and Value Creation through Interdisciplinarity: A Focus on The Mechanisms
Abstract Interdisciplinarity is essential in a world that requires innovative, collaborative, and holistic approaches to address complex social problems. This paper prese...
Publication: 'Review of Joe Moran, Interdisciplinarity 2nd edition', Rupkatha, 3, 1 (April 2011)
Publication: 'Review of Joe Moran, Interdisciplinarity 2nd edition', Rupkatha, 3, 1 (April 2011)
I have just had a review published in the Open Access journal Rupkatha. Rupkatha is an internationally recognised e-journal with a special focus on interdisciplinarity. My review, ...

Back to Top