Javascript must be enabled to continue!
comparative analysis: Success rates of Endoscopic Endonasal versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon tube.
View through CrossRef
Introduction:
Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a standard surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. it can be performed via external (E-DCR) or internal (EE-DCR) approaches, with each offering distinct advantages. E- DCR is well-established with high success rates but requires a longer recovery time. EE-DCR, being minimal invasive, Offers a faster recovery and better cosmetic outcomes, though requires longer recovery time. This study compares the anatomical and functional outcomes of EE-DCR and E-DCR with silicon tube.
Setting:
This study was conducted at Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, over a period of 5 years, from 1st July 2019 to 30th June 2024. Ethical approval was obtained from institutional review board (Ethical approval code: 9330924AKOPT, dated October 28, 2024.)
Material and Methods:
A total of 140 patients were included, divided into two groups of 70 each, EE-DCR and E-DCR. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 with nasolacrimal duct obstruction and a follow-up of at least one year. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23, with significance level of p < 0.05. Outcomes such as nasolacrimal duct patency and symptom improvement were assessed during follow-up at 1st day, 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1 year.
Results:
The mean age of patients was seen as 42.43 ± 10.9 years in EE-DCR and 49.00 ± 9.01 years in E-DCR group. Anatomical success rates for both groups at 3, 6 and 12 months were comparable, with no statistically significant difference (p-value > 0.05). At 3rf month, 87.14% of the EE-DCR patients and 91.43% of E-DCR patients showed nasolacrimal duct patency. Similarly, functional success rates were assessed showing 84.29% of EE-DCR and 87.14% of E-DCR patients were symptom- free at 3rd month.
Conclusion:
Both EE-DCR and E-DCR are effective treatments for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.EE-DCR offers advantages like faster recovery and fewer complications, while E-DCR remains reliable for complex cases.
Keywords: Dacryocystitis, External Dacryocystorhinostomy, Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy
Independent Medical Trust
Title: comparative analysis: Success rates of Endoscopic Endonasal versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon tube.
Description:
Introduction:
Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a standard surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
it can be performed via external (E-DCR) or internal (EE-DCR) approaches, with each offering distinct advantages.
E- DCR is well-established with high success rates but requires a longer recovery time.
EE-DCR, being minimal invasive, Offers a faster recovery and better cosmetic outcomes, though requires longer recovery time.
This study compares the anatomical and functional outcomes of EE-DCR and E-DCR with silicon tube.
Setting:
This study was conducted at Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, over a period of 5 years, from 1st July 2019 to 30th June 2024.
Ethical approval was obtained from institutional review board (Ethical approval code: 9330924AKOPT, dated October 28, 2024.
)
Material and Methods:
A total of 140 patients were included, divided into two groups of 70 each, EE-DCR and E-DCR.
Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 with nasolacrimal duct obstruction and a follow-up of at least one year.
Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23, with significance level of p < 0.
05.
Outcomes such as nasolacrimal duct patency and symptom improvement were assessed during follow-up at 1st day, 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1 year.
Results:
The mean age of patients was seen as 42.
43 ± 10.
9 years in EE-DCR and 49.
00 ± 9.
01 years in E-DCR group.
Anatomical success rates for both groups at 3, 6 and 12 months were comparable, with no statistically significant difference (p-value > 0.
05).
At 3rf month, 87.
14% of the EE-DCR patients and 91.
43% of E-DCR patients showed nasolacrimal duct patency.
Similarly, functional success rates were assessed showing 84.
29% of EE-DCR and 87.
14% of E-DCR patients were symptom- free at 3rd month.
Conclusion:
Both EE-DCR and E-DCR are effective treatments for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
EE-DCR offers advantages like faster recovery and fewer complications, while E-DCR remains reliable for complex cases.
Keywords: Dacryocystitis, External Dacryocystorhinostomy, Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.
Related Results
Quality of life assessment after non‐laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
Quality of life assessment after non‐laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
Objective: There has been a lack of patient‐centred evidence in the Otolaryngology literature, that non‐laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy improves the quality of life of patie...
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With Ologen Implant
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With Ologen Implant
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with ologen implant versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicon tube implantat...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Triamcinolone in Nasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Triamcinolone in Nasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy
Objective: To assess safety and long-term efficacy of use of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) soaked absorbable gel foam dressing in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in our population....
Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma with and without Sellar Floor Reconstruction
Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma with and without Sellar Floor Reconstruction
Objectives: This study aimed to compare CSF leak in endoscopic endonasal TSS of pituitary adenoma with and without reconstruction of the sellar floor with no intraoperative CSF le...
Results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective cohort study
Results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the success rate of endoscopic endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy
Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Ophthalmology and Otorhinolar...
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
PREVALENCE OF ENDONASAL PATHOLOGY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DACRYOCYSTITIS AND PECULIARITIES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT
PREVALENCE OF ENDONASAL PATHOLOGY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DACRYOCYSTITIS AND PECULIARITIES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT
Purpose – to study the prevalence of endonasal pathology in patients with chronicdacryocystitis (CD) and to justify the expediency of simultaneous operations in suchpatients.Materi...

