Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Fibulae of Ingvald Undset

View through CrossRef
In 1882 Ingvald Undset (1853-1893) acquired a collection of 122 fibulae and fragments in Rome for the University Museum in Christiania. Very likely it was Undset who catalogued the pieces by grouping them according to typological principals. Fibulae were of particular importance for the studies of Undset and his circle of colleagues and friends, since that artefact group was used to develop typological method in archaeology. Fibulae were also considered an excellent tool for chronological deductions. At the same time some important Scandinavian museum exhibitions were rearranged according to new concepts: pieces of the same artefact groups were aligned together in typological sequences. The didactical possibilities provided by such a large collection of fibulae and the possibility to demonstrate typological method are likely to be the motives behind Undset’s purchase. The typology used in the catalogue shows very strong dependence on recent typological studies, particularly on Oscar Montelius article on Bronze Age fibulae. Despite some problems, which can be blamed on the very limited comparative literature of that time, Undset’s typological grouping of some Roman fibulae show his sure instinct for the defi nition of new types. A publication of his results would have made a useful contribution to the knowledge of Roman fibulae of that time.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: The Fibulae of Ingvald Undset
Description:
In 1882 Ingvald Undset (1853-1893) acquired a collection of 122 fibulae and fragments in Rome for the University Museum in Christiania.
Very likely it was Undset who catalogued the pieces by grouping them according to typological principals.
Fibulae were of particular importance for the studies of Undset and his circle of colleagues and friends, since that artefact group was used to develop typological method in archaeology.
Fibulae were also considered an excellent tool for chronological deductions.
At the same time some important Scandinavian museum exhibitions were rearranged according to new concepts: pieces of the same artefact groups were aligned together in typological sequences.
The didactical possibilities provided by such a large collection of fibulae and the possibility to demonstrate typological method are likely to be the motives behind Undset’s purchase.
The typology used in the catalogue shows very strong dependence on recent typological studies, particularly on Oscar Montelius article on Bronze Age fibulae.
Despite some problems, which can be blamed on the very limited comparative literature of that time, Undset’s typological grouping of some Roman fibulae show his sure instinct for the defi nition of new types.
A publication of his results would have made a useful contribution to the knowledge of Roman fibulae of that time.

Related Results

The Fibulae of Ingvald Undset
The Fibulae of Ingvald Undset
In 1882 Ingvald Undset (1853-1893) acquired a collection of 122 fibulae and fragments in Rome for the University Museum in Christiania. Very likely it was Undset who catalogued the...
A Topographical Study of Nutrient Foramen in Human Fibulae
A Topographical Study of Nutrient Foramen in Human Fibulae
Introduction: The fibula is very well known amongst the surgeons for their usage in bone grafting. The vascularised bone graft is necessary for successful procedure. The vasculatur...
Dragonesque Fibulae
Dragonesque Fibulae
Since the publication of Mr. William Bulmer's paper in 1938 (Antiq. Journ. xviii, 146 f.) several dragonesque fibulae have been found and others—mentioned, but not illustrated, in ...
The Pagan Program of the Early Slavic Art: Man and Animals
The Pagan Program of the Early Slavic Art: Man and Animals
On the base of stylistic and iconographic analysis of the early Slavic pagan artwork, it is possible to see that programs for their creation can be some realistic, semantic, semiot...
Crossbow fibulae from Gamzigrad (Romuliana)
Crossbow fibulae from Gamzigrad (Romuliana)
In the site of Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana 31 crossbow fibulae (Zwiebelknopffibeln) were found. Except the finds from large Roman necropolis, the crossbow fibulae from Gamzig...
Bow-tie shaped fibulae from the cemetery of Budapest/Aquincum-Graphisoft Park
Bow-tie shaped fibulae from the cemetery of Budapest/Aquincum-Graphisoft Park
The main aim of this paper is the presentation of two rare fibulae from the Eastern Cemetery of the civil town of Budapest/Aquincum. On the former territory of the Óbuda Gas Factor...
Attraction and Enchantment
Attraction and Enchantment
This chapter is devoted to fibulae, which are clothing pins that operated on the same principle as the modern safety pin. The style of fibulae changed relatively rapidly throughout...
On the finds of provincial Roman fibulae on the territory of Belarus
On the finds of provincial Roman fibulae on the territory of Belarus
Abstract The article presents fibulae of provincial Roman origin from museum collections of the Republic of Belarus. They are relatively few in number and originate ...

Back to Top