Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate with Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate in Children with Acute Asthma

View through CrossRef
Background: Acute asthma is a frequent cause of pediatric emergency admissions, requiring prompt management to relieve airway obstruction and prevent respiratory failure. Magnesium sulphate, administered either intravenously or via nebulization, has been used as an adjunct to standard bronchodilator therapy due to its bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulphate with intravenous magnesium sulphate in children presenting with acute moderate-to-severe asthma. Methodology: A total of 148 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthma were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group received intravenous (IV) magnesium sulphate and the other nebulized magnesium sulphate, in addition to standard asthma therapy. The Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS) was recorded at baseline, and at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes. The duration of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay, total hospital stay, treatment efficacy, and adverse effects were compared between groups. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Both treatments significantly improved PAS over time, with a faster initial reduction at 30 minutes in the nebulized group (9.53 ± 2.44 vs. 10.32 ± 2.13; p = 0.036). The mean PICU stay was shorter in the nebulized group (3.32 ± 4.23 vs. 5.94 ± 9.78 hours; p = 0.036), as was total hospital stay (28.76 ± 19.21 vs. 47.08 ± 42.71 hours; p = 0.001). Treatment efficacy was similar between groups (p = 0.069). Adverse effects occurred in 29.7% of IV-treated patients but in none of the nebulized group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Nebulized magnesium sulphate provides comparable therapeutic efficacy to intravenous administration while offering faster initial improvement, shorter recovery, and a superior safety profile. It represents a safe, effective, and practical alternative for managing acute asthma in children.
Title: Comparison of Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate with Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate in Children with Acute Asthma
Description:
Background: Acute asthma is a frequent cause of pediatric emergency admissions, requiring prompt management to relieve airway obstruction and prevent respiratory failure.
Magnesium sulphate, administered either intravenously or via nebulization, has been used as an adjunct to standard bronchodilator therapy due to its bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulphate with intravenous magnesium sulphate in children presenting with acute moderate-to-severe asthma.
Methodology: A total of 148 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthma were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups.
One group received intravenous (IV) magnesium sulphate and the other nebulized magnesium sulphate, in addition to standard asthma therapy.
The Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS) was recorded at baseline, and at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes.
The duration of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay, total hospital stay, treatment efficacy, and adverse effects were compared between groups.
Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.
05).
Both treatments significantly improved PAS over time, with a faster initial reduction at 30 minutes in the nebulized group (9.
53 ± 2.
44 vs.
10.
32 ± 2.
13; p = 0.
036).
The mean PICU stay was shorter in the nebulized group (3.
32 ± 4.
23 vs.
5.
94 ± 9.
78 hours; p = 0.
036), as was total hospital stay (28.
76 ± 19.
21 vs.
47.
08 ± 42.
71 hours; p = 0.
001).
Treatment efficacy was similar between groups (p = 0.
069).
Adverse effects occurred in 29.
7% of IV-treated patients but in none of the nebulized group (p < 0.
001).
Conclusion: Nebulized magnesium sulphate provides comparable therapeutic efficacy to intravenous administration while offering faster initial improvement, shorter recovery, and a superior safety profile.
It represents a safe, effective, and practical alternative for managing acute asthma in children.

Related Results

The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Asthma Severity in US Adults
The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Asthma Severity in US Adults
Background/objectives: The association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and asthma severity among United States (US) adults with asthma has not been well documented. In...
Prevalence of Comorbidities among United States Adults with asthma and Their Association with Asthma Severity
Prevalence of Comorbidities among United States Adults with asthma and Their Association with Asthma Severity
AbstractIntroductionThe burden of comorbidities in asthma patients significantly affects management strategies and outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and trends o...
ASTHMA AND RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS RELATED TO THE ENVIRONMENT
ASTHMA AND RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS RELATED TO THE ENVIRONMENT
Asthma, a ubiquitous chronic respiratory ailment, stands as a formidable global health concern, affecting millions of individuals across the world. This widespread condition, marke...
Quality of life and its relation to pediatric asthma severity
Quality of life and its relation to pediatric asthma severity
Abstract Background Bronchial asthma is a global health problem that negatively affects the quality of life (QOL) of both children and their caregiv...
Increased expression of serum periostin and YKL40 in children with severe asthma and asthma exacerbation
Increased expression of serum periostin and YKL40 in children with severe asthma and asthma exacerbation
Children with severe asthma or acute asthma exacerbation may encounter difficulties in performing pulmonary function tests. In this situation, serum biomarkers can play a great rol...

Back to Top