Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect

View through CrossRef
This book aims to answer the following questions: what is the difference between a cause and a background condition? What is it to manifest a disposition? Can dispositions be extrinsic? What is the most basic kind of causation? And, what might a structural explanation be? Each chapter takes up a subset of these questions; the chapters are written to be readable independently. The answers defended rely on three ideas. Two of those ideas use a distinction from the study of lexical aspect, namely the distinction between stative verbs and non-stative verbs. The first idea is that events go with non-stative verbs, in the sense that “If S, then an event occurred in virtue of the fact that S” is true when the main verb in the clause going in for “S” is non-stative. The second is that acting, doing something, goes with non-stative verbs, in the sense that “In Ving X did something” is true iff V is a non-stative verb. The third idea is about levels of explanation: “(A because B) because C” does not entail “A because C.”
Oxford University Press
Title: Causation, Explanation, and the Metaphysics of Aspect
Description:
This book aims to answer the following questions: what is the difference between a cause and a background condition? What is it to manifest a disposition? Can dispositions be extrinsic? What is the most basic kind of causation? And, what might a structural explanation be? Each chapter takes up a subset of these questions; the chapters are written to be readable independently.
The answers defended rely on three ideas.
Two of those ideas use a distinction from the study of lexical aspect, namely the distinction between stative verbs and non-stative verbs.
The first idea is that events go with non-stative verbs, in the sense that “If S, then an event occurred in virtue of the fact that S” is true when the main verb in the clause going in for “S” is non-stative.
The second is that acting, doing something, goes with non-stative verbs, in the sense that “In Ving X did something” is true iff V is a non-stative verb.
The third idea is about levels of explanation: “(A because B) because C” does not entail “A because C.
”.

Related Results

Causal explanation
Causal explanation
An explanation is an answer to a why-question, and so a causal explanation is an answer to ‘Why X?’ that says something about the causes of X. For example, ‘Because it rained’ as a...
Causation, in modern philosophy
Causation, in modern philosophy
The new science of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries sparked intense reflection and theorizing on the nature of causation. Philosophers attempted to account for the nature of...
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
The interface between metaphysics and science refers to the close-knit relationship between Metaphysics as First Philosophy and science. The first conception of metaphysics by Aris...
Mary Shepherd
Mary Shepherd
Mary Shepherd (née Primrose, b. 1777–d. 1847) is the author of at least two books and three essays published during her lifetime. One of the key focuses of her work rests on the is...
What Should We Require from an Account of Explanation in Historiography?
What Should We Require from an Account of Explanation in Historiography?
Abstract In this paper, I explicate desiderata for accounts of explanation in historiography. I argue that a fully developed account of explanation in historiography must explicate...
Explanation Beyond Causation
Explanation Beyond Causation
Explanations are very important to us in many contexts: in science, mathematics, philosophy, and also in everyday and juridical contexts. But what is an explanation? In the philoso...
Metaphysics of Science as Naturalized Metaphysics
Metaphysics of Science as Naturalized Metaphysics
This chapter outlines a metaphysics of science in the sense of a naturalized metaphysics. It considers in the first place the interplay of physics and metaphysics in Newtonian mech...
Contemporary Epidemiologic Concepts Regarding Causality
Contemporary Epidemiologic Concepts Regarding Causality
There have been many important developments in quantitative models for assessing causality in the last two decades as well as important related developments in epidemiology, statis...

Back to Top