Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh
View through CrossRef
Azerbaijan’s September 19, 2023 attack on the Republic of Artsakh resulted in the almost total displacement of the indigenous Armenian population, making it one of the most successful genocides in history. For over a year before Azerbaijan’s attack, the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention viewed Artsakh as the “perfect storm” for genocide prevention and was using as many strategies as possible to urge Western leaders to recognize the threat and take effective action. Any leader willing to challenge Azerbaijan diplomatically would have had the work of many genocide scholars and genocide prevention organizations to back them up. We still believe that coordinated pressure from the Western powers could have had a chance of avoiding genocide and may have resulted in finding a secure, and perhaps independent, space for Artsakh Armenians in their ancestral homeland. This article aims to show how the case of genocide in Artsakh is an object lesson in how diplomatic silences, shaped by geopolitical interests, can provide the power framework in which genocide can easily take place, offer diplomatic cover for the state or organization committing the crime, and normalizing the crime within international relations. It proposes that the genocide in Artsakh ushered in a new “New Imperialism”, in which the post-1945 law-based world order is jettisoned for raw power, threatened communities and unwanted peoples are less safe than they were before September 19, 2023, and genocide will become the order of the day – unless we find new mechanisms to prevent it.
Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute Foundation
Title: Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh
Description:
Azerbaijan’s September 19, 2023 attack on the Republic of Artsakh resulted in the almost total displacement of the indigenous Armenian population, making it one of the most successful genocides in history.
For over a year before Azerbaijan’s attack, the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention viewed Artsakh as the “perfect storm” for genocide prevention and was using as many strategies as possible to urge Western leaders to recognize the threat and take effective action.
Any leader willing to challenge Azerbaijan diplomatically would have had the work of many genocide scholars and genocide prevention organizations to back them up.
We still believe that coordinated pressure from the Western powers could have had a chance of avoiding genocide and may have resulted in finding a secure, and perhaps independent, space for Artsakh Armenians in their ancestral homeland.
This article aims to show how the case of genocide in Artsakh is an object lesson in how diplomatic silences, shaped by geopolitical interests, can provide the power framework in which genocide can easily take place, offer diplomatic cover for the state or organization committing the crime, and normalizing the crime within international relations.
It proposes that the genocide in Artsakh ushered in a new “New Imperialism”, in which the post-1945 law-based world order is jettisoned for raw power, threatened communities and unwanted peoples are less safe than they were before September 19, 2023, and genocide will become the order of the day – unless we find new mechanisms to prevent it.
Related Results
History of Genocides
History of Genocides
The textbook presents the mass killings and other atrocities that have occurred worldwide and have been defined as genocide by international tribunals, other international bodies, ...
Cases Studied in <em>Genocide Studies and Prevention</em> and <em>Journal of Genocide Research</em> and Implications for the Field of Genocide Studies
Cases Studied in <em>Genocide Studies and Prevention</em> and <em>Journal of Genocide Research</em> and Implications for the Field of Genocide Studies
The adoption of the Genocide Convention in 1948 was accompanied by the emergence of genocide as a field of study, first in the form of Holocaust Studies, followed by Genocide Studi...
Genesis of Azerbaijan-Artsakh Conflict
Genesis of Azerbaijan-Artsakh Conflict
The purpose of the article, based on domestic and foreign sources, is to show when, for what reason and under what circumstances the Azerbaijani Artsakh conflict arose. In order t...
ARTSAKH IN THE GEOPOLITICAL AGENDA OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
ARTSAKH IN THE GEOPOLITICAL AGENDA OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
The Third Artsakh war demonstrated the transformation of the geopolitical environment in the South Caucasus. In this context, the article aims to identify the main potential scenar...
SOME QUESTIONS ON THE HISTORICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF ARTSAKH (XVI-XVII CENTURIES)
SOME QUESTIONS ON THE HISTORICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF ARTSAKH (XVI-XVII CENTURIES)
This article covers several issues related to the historical demography of Artsakh in the XVI-XVII centuries, based on the information from the primary sources. To this end, we hav...
ARTSAKH (KARABAKH) ISSUE IN CHINA'S FOREIGN POLICY
ARTSAKH (KARABAKH) ISSUE IN CHINA'S FOREIGN POLICY
At the end of the 20th century in Artsakh (Karabakh), the local indigenous Armenian population began to fight for independence and against Azerbaijani aggression. The purpose of th...
ECONOMIC LOSSES OF ARTSAKH DUE TO BLOCKADE. EVALUATION REPORT
ECONOMIC LOSSES OF ARTSAKH DUE TO BLOCKADE. EVALUATION REPORT
Since late 2022, the only "Road of Life" connecting The Republic of Artsakh
with the rest of the world and feeding Artsakh's economy was closed by the selfproclaimed "Eco Activists...
ԳԱՐԵԳԻՆ ՆԺԴԵՀԸ ԵՎ ԱՐՑԱԽԻ ԳՈՅԱՊԱՅՔԱՐԸ 1920 – 1921 ԹԹ. / GAREGIN NZHDEH AND ARTSAKH FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL OF 1920 - 1921
ԳԱՐԵԳԻՆ ՆԺԴԵՀԸ ԵՎ ԱՐՑԱԽԻ ԳՈՅԱՊԱՅՔԱՐԸ 1920 – 1921 ԹԹ. / GAREGIN NZHDEH AND ARTSAKH FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL OF 1920 - 1921
Garegin Nzhdeh played an important role in 1920 – 1921 Artsakh's fight for survival. His military operations in favor of the Armenians significantly changed the demographic profile...


