Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Urk. Barth 178

View through Europeana Collections
The citizens of Heidelberg and Pumpkin Adam Bilgar, currently guild master Scherererzunft, and the Scherer Konrad (Contz) Lerch, who were violated Barrier sners Bernhard Winter from Aflenz (offolentz) in Styria, certifying that they were born by Hans Oberndorfer, Kürschner and citizens in Heidelberg, 50 guilders. For this purpose, Bartholomäustag (24 August) or two weeks before or Then pay a rate of 2 ½ guilders. The guild masters set as security The guild house in Froschau, which is situated between the spanhauer (sponhewer) and The butcher’s trench lies. On the house there is an eternal interest of 2 guilders, which The field siech house in Au is to be paid. Should the guild masters A period of six weeks shall be granted for the purpose of reducing the Compensation. Should the amount due not have been received, Hans Oberndorfer enters into his rights and is allowed to use the house until the The amount of the money spent is balanced. Therefore, the two guild masters commit themselves or their successor, to keep the property in good condition so that they can In the first place, it is argued that the concept of “depreciation” has not been used and can always serve as a sufficient pledge. The The loan is repaid. Once the full sum including the annual interest (possibly outstanding) on Oberndorfer; or his heirs are paid, the present document loses its provisions Their validity, the house falls back to the guild masters or their successors and Oberndorfer has no more claims and demands in this matter. Announcement of the city seal, which, at the request of both parties, was Mayor Nikolaus Geilheuser and Wendel Speidel has been without the It is possible to derive demands on the city.
Heidelberg University Library
image-zoom
Title: Urk. Barth 178
Description:
The citizens of Heidelberg and Pumpkin Adam Bilgar, currently guild master Scherererzunft, and the Scherer Konrad (Contz) Lerch, who were violated Barrier sners Bernhard Winter from Aflenz (offolentz) in Styria, certifying that they were born by Hans Oberndorfer, Kürschner and citizens in Heidelberg, 50 guilders.
For this purpose, Bartholomäustag (24 August) or two weeks before or Then pay a rate of 2 ½ guilders.
The guild masters set as security The guild house in Froschau, which is situated between the spanhauer (sponhewer) and The butcher’s trench lies.
On the house there is an eternal interest of 2 guilders, which The field siech house in Au is to be paid.
Should the guild masters A period of six weeks shall be granted for the purpose of reducing the Compensation.
Should the amount due not have been received, Hans Oberndorfer enters into his rights and is allowed to use the house until the The amount of the money spent is balanced.
Therefore, the two guild masters commit themselves or their successor, to keep the property in good condition so that they can In the first place, it is argued that the concept of “depreciation” has not been used and can always serve as a sufficient pledge.
The The loan is repaid.
Once the full sum including the annual interest (possibly outstanding) on Oberndorfer; or his heirs are paid, the present document loses its provisions Their validity, the house falls back to the guild masters or their successors and Oberndorfer has no more claims and demands in this matter.
Announcement of the city seal, which, at the request of both parties, was Mayor Nikolaus Geilheuser and Wendel Speidel has been without the It is possible to derive demands on the city.

Related Results

Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Urk. Barth 64
Urk. Barth 64
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther, Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Urk. Barth 63
Urk. Barth 63
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther, Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Barth and Patristic Theology
Barth and Patristic Theology
This chapter examines Barth’s approach to patristic theology as well as his engagement with key doctrines and councils of the patristic era. It is clear in relation to Barth’s use ...

Back to Top